Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00781-18. Print 2018 Sep.
The microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children is challenging, as it relies on the collection of relatively invasive specimens by trained health care workers, which is not feasible in many settings. is detectable from the stools of children using molecular methods, but processing stool specimens is resource intensive. We evaluated a novel, simple, centrifugation-free processing method for stool specimens for use on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert), using two different stool masses: 0.6 g and a swab sample. Two hundred eighty children (median age, 15.5 months; 35 [12.5%] HIV infected) with suspected intrathoracic TB were enrolled from two sites in South Africa. Compared to a single Xpert test on respiratory specimens, the sensitivity of Xpert on stools using the 0.6-g and swab samples was 44.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7 to 78.8%) for both methods, with a specificity of >99%. The combined sensitivities of two stool tests versus the first respiratory Xpert were 70.0% (95% CI, 34.8 to 93.3) and 50.0% (95% CI, 18.7 to 81.3) for the 0.6-g and swab sample, respectively. Retesting stool specimens with nondeterminate Xpert results improved nondeterminate rates from 9.3% to 3.9% and from 8.6% to 4.3% for 0.6-g and swab samples, respectively. Overall, stool Xpert detected 14/94 (14.9%) children who initiated antituberculosis treatment, while respiratory specimens detected 23/94 (24.5%). This stool processing method is well suited for settings with low capacity for respiratory specimen collection. However, the overall sensitivity to detect confirmed and clinical TB was lower than that of respiratory specimens. More sensitive rapid molecular assays are needed to improve the utility of stools for the diagnosis of intrathoracic TB in children from resource-limited settings.
儿童结核病的微生物学诊断具有挑战性,因为它依赖于经过培训的卫生保健工作者采集相对有创的标本,而在许多情况下这是不可行的。使用分子方法可以从儿童的粪便中检测出分枝杆菌,但处理粪便标本需要大量资源。我们评估了一种新的、简单的、无需离心的粪便标本处理方法,用于 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测(Xpert),使用了两种不同的粪便量:0.6 克和拭子样本。从南非的两个地点共招募了 280 名(中位年龄 15.5 个月;35 名[12.5%]HIV 感染)疑似患有胸内结核的儿童。与单次呼吸道标本 Xpert 检测相比,两种方法的 0.6 克和拭子样本的 Xpert 检测对粪便标本的敏感性均为 44.4%(95%置信区间[CI],13.7 至 78.8%),特异性均>99%。两种粪便检测方法与首次呼吸道 Xpert 检测的联合敏感性分别为 70.0%(95%CI,34.8 至 93.3)和 50.0%(95%CI,18.7 至 81.3)。对于 0.6 克和拭子样本,重新检测 Xpert 结果不确定的粪便标本可将不确定率分别从 9.3%降至 3.9%和从 8.6%降至 4.3%。总的来说,粪便 Xpert 检测到了 14/94(14.9%)开始抗结核治疗的儿童,而呼吸道标本检测到了 23/94(24.5%)。这种粪便处理方法非常适合呼吸标本采集能力较低的环境。然而,与呼吸道标本相比,总体上检测确诊和临床结核病的敏感性较低。需要更敏感的快速分子检测方法来提高在资源有限的环境中使用粪便诊断儿童胸内结核的实用性。