• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国汽油车和插电式电动车的省级温室气体排放:基于消费电力视角的比较。

Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.

机构信息

Systems Assessment Center, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.

Aramco Services Company, Aramco Research Center-Detroit, Novi, Michigan 48377, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6944-6956. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08217. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c08217
PMID:33945267
Abstract

China has implemented strong incentives to promote the market penetration of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). In this study, we compare the well-to-wheels (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensities of PEVs with those of gasoline vehicles at the provincial level in the year 2017 by considering the heterogeneity in the consumption-based electricity mix and climate impacts on vehicle fuel economy. Results show a high variation of provincial WTW GHG emission intensities for battery electric vehicles (BEVs, 22-293 g COeq/km) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs, 82-298 g COeq/km) in contrast to gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs, 227-245 g COeq/km) and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs, 141-164 g COeq/km). Due to the GHG-intensive coal-based electricity and cold weather, WTW GHG emission intensities of BEVs and PHEVs are higher than those of gasoline ICEVs in seven and ten northern provinces in China, respectively. WTW GHG emission intensities of gasoline HEVs, on the other hand, are lower in 18 and 26 provinces than those of BEVs and PHEVs, respectively. The analysis suggests that province-specific PEV and electric grid development policies should be considered for GHG emission reductions of on-road transportation in China.

摘要

中国实施了强有力的激励措施,以促进插电式电动汽车(PEV)的市场渗透。在本研究中,我们通过考虑基于消费的电力组合的异质性和对车辆燃油经济性的气候影响,比较了 2017 年省级水平的 PEV 与汽油车的全生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放强度。结果表明,在与汽油内燃机汽车(ICEV,227-245gCOeq/km)和汽油混合动力汽车(HEV,141-164gCOeq/km)相比,电池电动汽车(BEV,22-293gCOeq/km)和插电式混合动力电动汽车(PHEV,82-298gCOeq/km)的省级全生命周期 GHG 排放强度存在很大差异。由于 GHG 排放密集型的煤炭基电力和寒冷的天气,在中国的七个和十个北方省份,BEV 和 PHEV 的全生命周期 GHG 排放强度分别高于汽油 ICEV。另一方面,在 18 个和 26 个省份,汽油 HEV 的全生命周期 GHG 排放强度分别低于 BEV 和 PHEV。分析表明,应考虑针对中国道路运输的 GHG 减排制定针对特定省份的 PEV 和电网发展政策。

相似文献

1
Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.中国汽油车和插电式电动车的省级温室气体排放:基于消费电力视角的比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6944-6956. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08217. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.中国苏州市采用新能源汽车的温室气体排放效益:一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):76286-76297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21284-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
China Electricity Generation Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity in 2030: Implications for Electric Vehicles.中国 2030 年电力行业温室气体排放强度:对电动汽车的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 21;53(10):6063-6072. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05264. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Implications of driving patterns on well-to-wheel performance of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.驾驶模式对插电式混合动力电动汽车的从油井到车轮性能的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):6363-70. doi: 10.1021/es203981a. Epub 2012 May 21.
6
Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.当前和未来美国轻型车的发展路径:从摇篮到坟墓全生命周期温室气体排放和经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 20;52(4):2392-2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Physics-Based Model To Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption of Electrified Vehicles.车辆轻量化的生命周期评估:基于物理模型的电动汽车使用阶段燃料消耗估算
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 18;50(20):11226-11233. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02059. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.在碳达峰和碳中和的背景下,哪种类型的电动汽车最值得推广?以中国一特大城市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155626. Epub 2022 May 2.
9
Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.印度是否应该向车辆电动化转型?评估印度替代燃料和传统燃料汽车的生命周期温室气体和标准空气污染物排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 5;56(13):9569-9582. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07718. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Electric vehicle adoption delivers public health and environmental benefits.采用电动汽车能带来公共健康和环境效益。
Eco Environ Health. 2023 Aug 2;2(4):193-194. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2023.07.008. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Multisectoral drivers of decarbonizing battery electric vehicles in China.中国电池电动汽车脱碳的多部门驱动因素。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 May 16;2(5):pgad123. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad123. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Electrifying passenger road transport in India requires near-term electricity grid decarbonisation.
要实现印度客运道路运输的电气化,就需要在近期实现电网的脱碳。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 19;13(1):2095. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29620-x.