Suppr超能文献

基因组公民科学的核心价值观:一项定性访谈研究的结果

Core values of genomic citizen science: results from a qualitative interview study.

作者信息

Guerrini Christi J, Trejo Meredith, Canfield Isabel, McGuire Amy L

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine, Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030.

出版信息

Biosocieties. 2022 Jun;17(2):203-228. doi: 10.1057/s41292-020-00208-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

Genomic citizen science initiatives that promote public involvement in the study or manipulation of genetic information are flourishing. These initiatives are diverse and range from data donation studies, to biological experimentation conducted in home and community laboratories, to self-experimentation. Understanding the values that citizen scientists associate with their activities and communities can be useful to policy development for citizen science. Here, we report values-relevant data from qualitative interviews with 38 stakeholders in genomic citizen science. Applying a theoretical framework that describes values as transcendent beliefs about desirable end states or behaviors that can be categorized according to the motivational goals that they express and the interests they serve, we identified nine core values of genomic citizen science: altruism, autonomy, fun, inclusivity, openness, reciprocity, respect, safety, and solidarity.

摘要

促进公众参与基因信息研究或操作的基因组公民科学倡议正在蓬勃发展。这些倡议多种多样,从数据捐赠研究到在家庭和社区实验室进行的生物实验,再到自我实验。了解公民科学家赋予其活动和社区的价值观,有助于制定公民科学政策。在此,我们报告了对38位基因组公民科学利益相关者进行定性访谈得到的与价值观相关的数据。应用一个理论框架,该框架将价值观描述为关于理想最终状态或行为的超越性信念,这些信念可根据它们所表达的动机目标和所服务的利益进行分类,我们确定了基因组公民科学的九个核心价值观:利他主义、自主性、乐趣、包容性、开放性、互惠性、尊重、安全性和团结性。

相似文献

1
Core values of genomic citizen science: results from a qualitative interview study.
Biosocieties. 2022 Jun;17(2):203-228. doi: 10.1057/s41292-020-00208-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs?
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0419-1.
3
How Biomedical Citizen Scientists Define What They Do: It's All in the Name.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):63-70. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1825139. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Credit for and Control of Research Outputs in Genomic Citizen Science.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2020 Aug 31;21:465-489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021812.
7
9
Citizen science as a vehicle to address multiple policy objectives: Case studies from Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Oct;35(4):1326-1336. doi: 10.1002/hpja.866. Epub 2024 May 19.
10
Learning outcomes for participants in citizen science mosquito surveillance.
J Med Entomol. 2024 Nov 14;61(6):1399-1409. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae117.

引用本文的文献

2
Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Aug 22;4(1):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.08.007. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Blending citizen science with natural language processing and machine learning: Understanding the experience of living with multiple sclerosis.
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Aug 2;2(8):e0000305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000305. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
"Idealists and capitalists": ownership attitudes and preferences in genomic citizen science.
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(2):74-95. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2022.2063827. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
The Promissory Visions of DIYbio: Reimaging Science from the Fringe.
Sci Cult (Lond). 2022 Jan 17;31(3):287-310. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2028135. eCollection 2022.
8

本文引用的文献

1
The accelerating pace of biotech democratization.
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;37(12):1403-1408. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0339-0.
2
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs?
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0419-1.
3
Biomedical Citizen Science or Something Else? Reflections on Terms and Definitions.
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619880.
4
Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services.
Genet Med. 2020 Jan;22(1):4-11. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0627-6. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research.
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):3-14. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859.
6
Regulating genetic biohacking.
Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):34-36. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3248.
7
Citizen science, public policy.
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):134-136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8379.
8
APPLaUD: access for patients and participants to individual level uninterpreted genomic data.
Hum Genomics. 2018 Feb 17;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0139-5.
9
"Bridge to the Literature"? Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools and the Views of Tool Developers.
J Genet Couns. 2018 Aug;27(4):770-781. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0217-9. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Participatory Genomic Research: Ethical Issues from the Bottom Up to the Top Down.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 31;18:357-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035230. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验