Breast Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
Xiehe Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 14;16(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1424-4.
Dose-dense chemotherapy is a widely accepted regimen for high-risk breast cancer patients. However, conflicting survival benefits of pure dose-dense chemotherapy have been reported in different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of pure dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer.
A literature search of electronic databases and websites was performed to identify phase III RCTs reporting the efficacy and toxicity of pure dose-dense chemotherapy. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicities. The hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence and the odds ratios (ORs) of adverse events were estimated and pooled.
Seven studies (five trials) were eligible, encompassing a total of 9851 patients. Patients treated with dose-dense chemotherapy obtained better DFS (HR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.75-0.91; p = 0.0001) than those treated with the conventional schedule, while OS benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy was less impressive (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.73-1.02; p = 0.08). However, significant OS benefit was observed in node-positive patients (HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.90; p = 0.001). The incidence of anemia, pain, and transaminase elevation was higher in the dose-dense chemotherapy arm.
Dose-dense chemotherapy leads to better prognosis; these findings suggest that it may be a potentially preferred treatment for breast cancer patients, particularly for women with lymph node involvement. However, more RCTs are warranted to better define the best candidates for dose-dense chemotherapy.
密集化疗方案已被广泛应用于高危乳腺癌患者。然而,不同随机对照试验(RCT)报道的密集化疗方案的生存获益结果却相互矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在进一步评估密集化疗方案治疗乳腺癌的疗效和安全性。
检索电子数据库和网站,筛选出报道纯密集化疗方案疗效和毒性的 III 期 RCT。主要研究终点为总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)和毒性。采用风险比(HR)和比值比(OR)评估死亡和复发风险以及不良事件发生率。
共纳入 7 项研究(5 项试验),包含 9851 例患者。与常规化疗相比,密集化疗方案可改善 DFS(HR=0.83;95%CI 0.75-0.91;p=0.0001),但对 OS 的影响较小(HR=0.86;95%CI 0.73-1.02;p=0.08)。然而,在淋巴结阳性患者中,密集化疗方案具有显著的 OS 获益(HR=0.77;95%CI 0.66-0.90;p=0.001)。密集化疗组贫血、疼痛和转氨酶升高的发生率较高。
密集化疗方案可改善预后,提示其可能是一种有前途的乳腺癌治疗方法,尤其适用于淋巴结受累的女性。然而,仍需要更多 RCT 来更好地确定适合密集化疗的患者人群。