• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪种类型的烟草产品警示图像随着时间推移更有效且可持续?对加拿大、澳大利亚和墨西哥吸烟者的纵向评估。

Which type of tobacco product warning imagery is more effective and sustainable over time? A longitudinal assessment of smokers in Canada, Australia and Mexico.

作者信息

Anshari Dien, Yong Hua-Hie, Borland Ron, Hammond David, Swayampakala Kamala, Thrasher Jim

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e021983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021983.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021983
PMID:30007932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6089327/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined smokers' responses to pictorial health warnings (PHWs) with different types of imagery under natural exposure conditions.

METHODS

Adult smokers from online panels in Canada (n=2357), Australia (n=1671) and Mexico (n=2537) were surveyed every 4 months from 2012 to 2013. Participants were shown PHWs on packs in their respective countries and asked about: (1) noticing PHWs; (2) negative affects towards PHWs; (3) believability of PHWs; (4) PHW-stimulated discussions; and (5) quit motivation due to PHWs. Country-specific generalised estimating equation models regressed these outcomes on time (ie, survey wave), PHW imagery type (ie, symbolic representations of risk, suffering from smoking and graphic depictions of bodily harm) and interactions between them.

RESULTS

In all countries, PHW responses did not significantly change over time, except for increased noticing PHWs in Canada and Mexico, increased negative affect in Australia and decreased negative affect in Mexico. For all outcomes, symbolic PHWs were rated lower than suffering and graphic PHWs in Canada (the only country with symbolic PHWs). Graphic PHWs were rated higher than suffering PHWs for negative affect (all countries), discussions (Canada) and quit motivation (Australia). Suffering PHWs were rated higher than graphic PHWs for noticing PHWs (Canada), believability (all countries), discussions (AustraliaandMexico) and quit motivation (Mexico). Changes in noticing, believability and discussions varied somewhat by imagery type across countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The different PHW imagery appears to have different pathways of influence on adult smokers. Reactions to specific PHWs are similar over 1-2 years, suggesting that wear-out of PHW effects is due to decreased attention rather than the diminishing effectiveness of content.

摘要

目的

本研究在自然暴露条件下,考察吸烟者对带有不同类型图像的图片健康警示(PHW)的反应。

方法

2012年至2013年期间,每隔4个月对来自加拿大(n = 2357)、澳大利亚(n = 1671)和墨西哥(n = 2537)在线小组的成年吸烟者进行调查。向参与者展示各自国家烟包上的图片健康警示,并询问他们:(1)是否注意到图片健康警示;(2)对图片健康警示的负面情绪;(3)图片健康警示的可信度;(4)由图片健康警示引发的讨论;以及(5)因图片健康警示而产生的戒烟动机。特定国家的广义估计方程模型将这些结果按时间(即调查波次)、图片健康警示图像类型(即风险的象征性表示、吸烟导致的痛苦以及身体伤害的图形描绘)及其之间的相互作用进行回归分析。

结果

在所有国家中,除了加拿大和墨西哥注意到图片健康警示的情况有所增加、澳大利亚负面情绪增加以及墨西哥负面情绪减少外,图片健康警示的反应随时间并未显著变化。对于所有结果,在加拿大(唯一有象征性图片健康警示的国家),象征性图片健康警示的评分低于体现痛苦和图形化的图片健康警示。在负面情绪(所有国家)、讨论(加拿大)和戒烟动机(澳大利亚)方面,图形化图片健康警示的评分高于体现痛苦的图片健康警示。在注意到图片健康警示(加拿大)、可信度(所有国家)、讨论(澳大利亚和墨西哥)和戒烟动机(墨西哥)方面,体现痛苦的图片健康警示的评分高于图形化图片健康警示。不同国家中,注意到、可信度和讨论方面的变化因图像类型而有所不同。

结论

不同的图片健康警示图像似乎对成年吸烟者有不同的影响途径。在1 - 2年的时间里,对特定图片健康警示的反应相似,这表明图片健康警示效果的减弱是由于关注度下降,而非内容有效性的降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a995/6089327/5bb5aa440706/bmjopen-2018-021983f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a995/6089327/f0167aaf7c69/bmjopen-2018-021983f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a995/6089327/5bb5aa440706/bmjopen-2018-021983f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a995/6089327/f0167aaf7c69/bmjopen-2018-021983f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a995/6089327/5bb5aa440706/bmjopen-2018-021983f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Which type of tobacco product warning imagery is more effective and sustainable over time? A longitudinal assessment of smokers in Canada, Australia and Mexico.哪种类型的烟草产品警示图像随着时间推移更有效且可持续?对加拿大、澳大利亚和墨西哥吸烟者的纵向评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e021983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021983.
2
Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts.关于香烟包装上图片健康警示的人际沟通:政策相关影响及与戒烟尝试的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.042. Epub 2015 May 31.
3
Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US.路径分析:警示标签对负面情绪和戒烟尝试的影响——对澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国吸烟者的纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Over-Time Impacts of Pictorial Health Warning Labels and their Differences across Smoker Subgroups: Results from Adult Smokers in Canada and Australia.长时间使用图形健康警示标签对不同吸烟群体的影响:来自加拿大和澳大利亚成年吸烟者的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):888-896. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx134.
5
Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.对香烟警示标签的抵触情绪重要吗?澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国成年吸烟者对警示标签的反应及后续戒烟情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159245. eCollection 2016.
6
Quasi-experimentally examining the impact of introducing tobacco pictorial health warnings: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) 4C and Netherlands surveys in the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and the United States.准实验研究引入烟草图形健康警示的影响:来自国际烟草控制(ITC)4C 项目和荷兰、澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国的调查结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107818. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107818. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
Evidence of the Effectiveness of Pictorial Health Warnings on Cigarette Packaging in Nepal.尼泊尔烟包图形健康警示效果的证据。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Nov 1;22(S2):35-44. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.S2.35.
8
Would placing pictorial health warnings on waterpipe devices reduce waterpipe tobacco smoking? A qualitative exploration of Egyptian waterpipe smokers' and non-smokers' responses.在水烟器具上张贴图形健康警示是否会减少水烟烟草的使用?对埃及水烟吸烟者和非吸烟者反应的定性探讨。
Tob Control. 2019 Jul;28(4):475-478. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054494. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: a comparison between Mexico and Canada.吸烟者对带有图像和仅带文字的香烟包装警示的反应:墨西哥与加拿大的比较。
Salud Publica Mex. 2007;49 Suppl 2:S233-40. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342007000800013.
10
Changes in Vietnamese Male Smokers' Reactions Towards New Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Over Time.越南男性吸烟者对新的香烟包装图片警示的反应随时间的变化。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(S1):71-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.s1.71.

引用本文的文献

1
Little Cigar and Cigarillo Graphic Health Warnings and Quitting Behaviors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.小雪茄和小雪茄烟盒上的图形健康警示与戒烟行为:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526799. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26799.
2
Campaign messages to support pictorial health warning labels for little cigars and cigarillos: an online survey-based experiment.支持小雪茄和小烟卷图片健康警示标签的宣传信息:一项基于在线调查的实验
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):e094687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094687.
3
The Role of Harm Visibility for Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigars.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of plain package branding and graphic health warnings on adolescent smokers in the USA, Spain and France.在美国、西班牙和法国,普通包装标识及图形健康警示对青少年吸烟者的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(e2):e120-e126. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052583. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
Predictive and External Validity of a Pre-Market Study to Determine the Most Effective Pictorial Health Warning Label Content for Cigarette Packages.一项上市前研究的预测效度和外部效度,该研究旨在确定香烟包装上最有效的图片健康警示标签内容。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1376-81. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv184. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.
危害可见性在雪茄图片健康警示标签中的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):714-721. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae113.
4
Optimising messages and images for e-cigarette warnings.优化电子烟警告的信息和图像。
Tob Control. 2025 Jan 2;34(1):6-13. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057859.
5
Testing the effectiveness of alcohol health warning label formats: An online experimental study with Australian adult drinkers.测试酒精健康警示标签格式的有效性:一项针对澳大利亚成年饮酒者的在线实验研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0276189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276189. eCollection 2022.
6
Examining the Effectiveness of the 2012 Canadian Graphic Warning Label Policy Change by Sex, Income, and Education.考察 2012 年加拿大图形警示标签政策变化在性别、收入和教育方面的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Mar 22;25(4):763-772. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac235.
7
Cross-sectional online survey of the impact of new tobacco health warnings in Colombia.哥伦比亚新烟草健康警示影响的横断面在线调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 27;12(6):e056754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056754.
8
Role of affective reactivity induced by cigarette packaging including graphic warning labels: the CASA Study.卷烟包装(包括图形警示标签)引起的情感反应作用:CASA 研究。
Tob Control. 2023 May;32(3):315-322. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056650. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
9
The effectiveness of graphic health warnings on tobacco products: a systematic review on perceived harm and quit intentions.图形健康警示对烟草制品效果的影响:关于感知危害和戒烟意愿的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 20;21(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10810-z.
10
'It brings light to what you really put into your body': a focus group study of reactions to messages about nicotine reduction in cigarettes.“它让你清楚地知道自己摄入了什么”:对香烟中尼古丁降低含量信息的反应的焦点小组研究。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(5):649-654. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056312. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
香烟包装图案警示:实验研究的荟萃分析
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):341-54. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Neural biomarkers for assessing different types of imagery in pictorial health warning labels for cigarette packaging: a cross-sectional study.用于评估卷烟包装图形健康警语标签中不同类型意象的神经生物标志物:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 31;4(12):e006411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006411.
5
Longer term impact of cigarette package warnings in Australia compared with the United Kingdom and Canada.与英国和加拿大相比,澳大利亚香烟包装警示的长期影响。
Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):67-80. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu074. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
6
Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts.香烟警示标签对戒烟尝试影响的中介途径。
Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1410-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000056. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Changes in effectiveness of cigarette health warnings over time in Canada and the United States, 2002-2011.2002年至2011年加拿大和美国香烟健康警示效力随时间的变化
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 May;16(5):536-43. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt196. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
8
Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels.香烟警语标签影响的情绪和认知中介因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Mar;16(3):263-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt124. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.年轻人对香烟包装上图形警示标签的反应。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e14-22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
10
Impact of tobacco-related health warning labels across socioeconomic, race and ethnic groups: results from a randomized web-based experiment.烟草相关健康警示标签对社会经济地位、种族和族裔群体的影响:一项基于网络的随机对照试验结果。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052206. Epub 2013 Jan 14.