Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估不良照料者行为复发情况的实验室模型。

A laboratory model for evaluating relapse of undesirable caregiver behavior.

作者信息

Mitteer Daniel R, Greer Brian D, Fisher Wayne W, Briggs Adam M, Wacker David P

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.

University of Iowa.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Sep;110(2):252-266. doi: 10.1002/jeab.462. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Abstract

The success of behavioral treatments like functional communication training depends on their continued implementation outside of the clinical context, where failures in caregiver treatment adherence can lead to the relapse of destructive behavior. In the present study, we developed a laboratory model for evaluating the relapse of undesirable caregiver behavior that simulates two common sources of disruption (i.e., changes in context and in treatment efficacy) believed to affect caregiver treatment adherence using simulated confederate destructive behavior. In Phase 1, the caregiver's delivery of reinforcers for destructive behavior terminated confederate destructive behavior in a home-like context. In Phase 2, the caregiver implemented functional communication training in a clinical context in which providing reinforcers for destructive or alternative behavior terminated confederate destructive behavior. In Phase 3, the caregiver returned to the home-like context, and caregiver behavior produced no effect on confederate destructive or alternative behavior, simulating an inconsolable child. Undesirable caregiver behavior relapsed in three of four treatment-adherence challenges.

摘要

诸如功能性沟通训练等行为治疗的成功取决于它们在临床环境之外的持续实施,因为在这种情况下,照顾者治疗依从性的失败可能导致破坏性行为的复发。在本研究中,我们开发了一个实验室模型,用于评估不良照顾者行为的复发,该模型使用模拟的同盟破坏性行为来模拟被认为会影响照顾者治疗依从性的两种常见干扰源(即环境变化和治疗效果变化)。在第一阶段,照顾者对破坏性行为给予强化物,在类似家庭的环境中终止了同盟的破坏性行为。在第二阶段,照顾者在临床环境中实施功能性沟通训练,在该环境中,对破坏性行为或替代行为给予强化物会终止同盟的破坏性行为。在第三阶段,照顾者回到类似家庭的环境中,照顾者的行为对同盟的破坏性行为或替代行为没有影响,模拟了一个无法安慰的孩子。在四个治疗依从性挑战中,有三个出现了不良照顾者行为的复发。

相似文献

4
Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.基线强化率与破坏性行为的复燃。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Jan;111(1):75-93. doi: 10.1002/jeab.488. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
5
Renewal during functional communication training.功能性沟通训练期间的更新。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jul;51(3):603-619. doi: 10.1002/jaba.471. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

3
Understanding and Reacting to Relapse: Considerations for Practitioners.理解复发并做出反应:从业者需考虑的因素
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Oct 15;18(1):34-55. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00997-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".区分“失误”与“复发”的必要性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Feb 14;48(1):115-132. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00436-6. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Further evidence of renewal in automatically maintained behavior.自动维持行为中更新的进一步证据。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Mar;57(2):490-501. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1055. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
Relapse and its mitigation: Toward behavioral inoculation.复发及其缓解:走向行为免疫。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):282-301. doi: 10.1002/jaba.971. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
9
Basic and applied research on extinction bursts.灭绝爆发的基础和应用研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):4-28. doi: 10.1002/jaba.954. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

7
On defining resurgence.论复苏的定义。
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验