• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症门诊患者适应能力量表的编制：信效度验证

Development of an adjustment ability scale for outpatients with cancer: Verification of its reliability and validity.

作者信息

Hirokawa Keiko, Suzuki Shizue

机构信息

Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare Kurashiki Okayama Japan.

Kobe City College of Nursing Kobe Hyogo Japan.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2018 Apr 15;5(3):351-361. doi: 10.1002/nop2.145. eCollection 2018 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.145
PMID:30062029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056439/
Abstract

AIMS

To develop an adjustment ability scale for outpatients with cancer and to investigate its reliability and validity.

DESIGN

Quantitative study.

METHODS

A proposed adjustment ability scale was prepared based on scale development guidelines. Its reliability and validity were statistically analysed using data obtained from 369 patients.

RESULTS

Six factors were extracted from the factor analysis. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.95 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.83. A correlation coefficient of .48 was determined between the adjustment ability scale and the Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale (Japanese version), which assesses psychological adaptations via the cognitive-behavioural responses of patients with cancer. The correlation coefficient between the scale and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Japanese version 4), which measures quality of life among patients with cancer, was 0.15.

摘要

目的

开发一种癌症门诊患者适应能力量表，并调查其信效度。

设计

定量研究。

方法

根据量表编制指南编制一个拟议的适应能力量表。使用从369名患者获得的数据对其信效度进行统计学分析。

结果

从因子分析中提取出六个因子。克朗巴哈α系数为0.95，重测信度系数为0.83。适应能力量表与癌症心理适应量表（日文版）之间的相关系数为0.48，该量表通过癌症患者的认知行为反应评估心理适应情况。该量表与癌症治疗功能评估通用版（日文版4）之间的相关系数为0.15，该量表测量癌症患者的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/6056439/73a0f1644bc2/NOP2-5-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/6056439/73a0f1644bc2/NOP2-5-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d8/6056439/73a0f1644bc2/NOP2-5-351-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an adjustment ability scale for outpatients with cancer: Verification of its reliability and validity.癌症门诊患者适应能力量表的编制：信效度验证
Nurs Open. 2018 Apr 15;5(3):351-361. doi: 10.1002/nop2.145. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表（RAS）的日语版的信度和效度：量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Modified Breast Cancer Worry Scale.改良版乳腺癌担忧量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1681-1687.
4
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》（RAQ）日语版的心理测量学特性：一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.
5
Development and validation of the Japanese version of cognitive flexibility scale.日语版认知灵活性量表的编制与验证
BMC Res Notes. 2016 May 17;9:275. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2070-y.
6
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.中文版家庭复原力问卷（FaRE问卷）在乳腺癌患者中的信效度：一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e051093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Scale for Assessing the Stigma of Mental Illness in Nursing.中文版护理中精神疾病耻辱感评估量表的信效度
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 15;12:754774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.754774. eCollection 2021.
8
[Compilation and evaluation of perioperative nursing quality assessment scale].[围手术期护理质量评估量表的编制与评价]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014 Jul;39(7):733-8. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2014.07.015.
9
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among people with mental illness living in the community.社区精神疾病患者心理健康自我管理问卷的日本版信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2019 May 22;7(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0301-4.
10
Construct Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version Personal Adjustment and Role Skills Scale III for Adolescents With Chronic Disease.中文版青少年慢性病患者个人调整与角色技能量表 III 的结构效度和信度。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;53:e136-e141. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Validating an Adjustment Scale: The Adaptation Status Assessment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.编制与验证一份调适量表：耐药结核病患者的适应状况评估
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Jan 13;13:67-78. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S231792. eCollection 2020.
2
Adjustment ability and associated factors of outpatients living with cancer.癌症门诊患者的适应能力及相关因素
Nurs Open. 2018 Dec 14;6(2):408-417. doi: 10.1002/nop2.221. eCollection 2019 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative exploration of the experiences of patients with breast cancer receiving outpatient-based chemotherapy.接受门诊化疗的乳腺癌患者体验的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Oct;73(10):2339-2350. doi: 10.1111/jan.13309. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Negative and positive life changes following treatment completion: Chinese breast cancer survivors' perspectives.治疗结束后的负面和正面生活变化：中国乳腺癌幸存者的观点
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):791-798. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2845-z. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
3
A longitudinal study of coping strategies in men receiving radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: a quantitative and qualitative study.
一项针对接受放射治疗和新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗前列腺癌的男性应对策略的纵向研究：一项定量和定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Mar;70(3):625-38. doi: 10.1111/jan.12224. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
4
Taste alteration in breast cancer patients treated with taxane chemotherapy: experience, effect, and coping strategies.接受紫杉烷类化疗的乳腺癌患者的味觉改变：体验、影响和应对策略。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):549-55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1551-3. Epub 2012 Aug 5.
5
Younger women's perceptions of coping with breast cancer.年轻女性应对乳腺癌的认知
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):85-94. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000265001.72064.dd.
6
Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the General Measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G), for Japanese.针对日本人群的国际问卷——癌症治疗功能评估通用量表（FACT-G）的跨文化验证。
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(8):701-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1013851216181.
7
Perceived quality of life and coping for Swedish women with breast cancer who choose complementary medicine.选择补充替代医学的瑞典乳腺癌女性的生活质量感知与应对方式
Cancer Nurs. 2001 Oct;24(5):395-401. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200110000-00012.
8
The influence of uncertainty in illness, stress appraisal, and hope on coping in survivors of breast cancer.疾病不确定性、压力评估及希望对乳腺癌幸存者应对方式的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2000 Dec;23(6):422-9. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200012000-00004.
9
Influence of psychological response on survival in breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.心理反应对乳腺癌患者生存的影响：一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet. 1999 Oct 16;354(9187):1331-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11392-2.
10
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.癌症治疗功能评估量表：通用测量方法的制定与验证
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.