• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反事实推理是决策中先验学习的基础。

Counterfactual Reasoning Underlies the Learning of Priors in Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Department of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA; Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.

出版信息

Neuron. 2018 Sep 5;99(5):1083-1097.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.035
PMID:30122376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6127036/
Abstract

Accurate decisions require knowledge of prior probabilities (e.g., prevalence or base rate), but it is unclear how prior probabilities are learned in the absence of a teacher. We hypothesized that humans could learn base rates from experience making decisions, even without feedback. Participants made difficult decisions about the direction of dynamic random dot motion. Across blocks of 15-42 trials, the base rate favoring left or right varied. Participants were not informed of the base rate or choice accuracy, yet they gradually biased their choices and thereby increased accuracy and confidence in their decisions. They achieved this by updating knowledge of base rate after each decision, using a counterfactual representation of confidence that simulates a neutral prior. The strategy is consistent with Bayesian updating of belief and suggests that humans represent both true confidence, which incorporates the evolving belief of the prior, and counterfactual confidence, which discounts the prior.

摘要

准确的决策需要先验概率(例如,患病率或基础率)的知识,但在没有教师的情况下,先验概率是如何被学习的还不清楚。我们假设,即使没有反馈,人类也可以从经验中学习基础比率,通过做出决策。参与者对动态随机点运动的方向做出了困难的决策。在 15-42 次试验的块中,支持左或右的基础比率发生了变化。参与者没有被告知基础比率或选择准确性,但他们逐渐改变了选择,从而提高了决策的准确性和信心。他们通过在每次决策后更新对基础比率的知识来实现这一点,使用对信心的反事实表示,该表示模拟了中立的先验。该策略与信念的贝叶斯更新一致,表明人类既代表真实的信心,其中包括对先验的不断发展的信念,也代表反事实的信心,其中扣除了先验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/6f27d135d44d/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/5747c5fba358/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/eda231dff2a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/b360afcde484/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/19381ca522e7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/f1e27592df0c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/581df4875409/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/720420708ae4/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/9859f7799eff/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/70d460adcf21/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/6f27d135d44d/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/5747c5fba358/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/eda231dff2a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/b360afcde484/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/19381ca522e7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/f1e27592df0c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/581df4875409/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/720420708ae4/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/9859f7799eff/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/70d460adcf21/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ad/6127036/6f27d135d44d/fx2.jpg

相似文献

1
Counterfactual Reasoning Underlies the Learning of Priors in Decision Making.反事实推理是决策中先验学习的基础。
Neuron. 2018 Sep 5;99(5):1083-1097.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
2
Clinically established early Parkinson's disease patients do not show impaired use of priors in conditions of perceptual uncertainty.临床确诊的早期帕金森病患者在知觉不确定的情况下并未表现出先前信息利用受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Sep 9;202:108965. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108965. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy.在不同时间尺度上运行的分层决策过程是选择和策略变化的基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 2;113(31):E4531-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524685113. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
4
Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction.知觉与分类决策:不同抽象层次上两个领域的目标相关表征。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun 1;117(6):2088-2103. doi: 10.1152/jn.00512.2016. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Subjective experience of motion or attentional selection of a categorical decision.运动的主观体验或分类决策的注意力选择。
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4110-2. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0424-08.2008.
6
Confidence Representation of Perceptual Decision by EEG and Eye Data in a Random Dot Motion Task.基于脑电和眼动数据的随机点扩散任务中知觉决策的置信度表示。
Neuroscience. 2019 May 15;406:510-527. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Can natural selection encode Bayesian priors?自然选择能否编码贝叶斯先验概率?
J Theor Biol. 2017 Aug 7;426:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 20.
8
Temporal dynamics of decision-making during motion perception in the visual cortex.视觉皮层中运动感知过程中决策的时间动态。
Vision Res. 2008 Jun;48(12):1345-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.019. Epub 2008 May 2.
9
Complexity and specificity of experimentally-induced expectations in motion perception.运动感知中实验诱导期望的复杂性和特异性。
J Vis. 2013 Mar 13;13(4):8. doi: 10.1167/13.4.8.
10
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.决策过程中的个体差异塑造了中脑边缘多巴胺调节选择信心和改变想法的方式。
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1038/s41593-025-02015-z.
2
Computational basis of hierarchical and counterfactual information processing.分层与反事实信息处理的计算基础。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02232-3.
3
Empirically Integrating the Evidence for Different Predictive Coding Components Using Auditory False Perception.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
2
Piercing of Consciousness as a Threshold-Crossing Operation.意识穿刺:阈限跨越的操作。
Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 7;27(15):2285-2295.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Visual Decision-Making in an Uncertain and Dynamic World.在不确定和动态的世界中进行视觉决策。
运用听觉错觉实证整合不同预测编码成分的证据
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jun 1;46(8):e70211. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70211.
4
A population representation of the confidence in a decision in the parietal cortex.顶叶皮层中对决策信心的群体表征。
Cell Rep. 2025 Apr 22;44(4):115526. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115526. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
5
A corticostriatal learning mechanism linking excess striatal dopamine and auditory hallucinations.一种将纹状体多巴胺过量与幻听相联系的皮质纹状体学习机制。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 18:2025.03.18.643990. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.18.643990.
6
Delusional Unreality and Predictive Processing.妄想性现实与预测性加工
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Dec 20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.006.
7
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。
Elife. 2024 Dec 10;13:RP96997. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96997.
8
Prefrontal transthalamic uncertainty processing drives flexible switching.前额叶经丘脑不确定性处理驱动灵活转换。
Nature. 2025 Jan;637(8044):127-136. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08180-8. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
9
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 11:2024.01.13.575363. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.13.575363.
10
Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.决策过程中的个体差异塑造了中脑边缘多巴胺调节选择信心和改变想法的方式。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 16:2024.09.16.613237. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613237.
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 15;3:227-250. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114511. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Integration of individual and social information for decision-making in groups of different sizes.整合个人和社会信息以在不同规模群体中进行决策。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 28;15(6):e2001958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001958. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
Social Information Is Integrated into Value and Confidence Judgments According to Its Reliability.社会信息根据其可靠性被整合到价值和信心判断中。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 21;37(25):6066-6074. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3880-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.耦合决策过程在动态环境中更新并维持扫视先验。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 29;37(13):3632-3645. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3078-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Suboptimal Criterion Learning in Static and Dynamic Environments.静态和动态环境中的次优准则学习
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 3;13(1):e1005304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005304. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions.信心是多阶段决策之间的桥梁。
Curr Biol. 2016 Dec 5;26(23):3157-3168. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
The influence of evidence volatility on choice, reaction time and confidence in a perceptual decision.证据波动性对感知决策中选择、反应时间和信心的影响。
Elife. 2016 Oct 27;5:e17688. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17688.
10
Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy.在不同时间尺度上运行的分层决策过程是选择和策略变化的基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 2;113(31):E4531-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524685113. Epub 2016 Jul 18.