School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Cookson Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University, London, UK.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Nov;118(11):2435-2442. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3970-4. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
This study investigated the effects of L-menthol mouth rinse and ice slurry ingestion on time to exhaustion, when administered at the latter stages (~ 85%) of baseline exercise duration in the heat (35 °C).
Ten male participants performed four time to exhaustion (TTE) trials on a cycle ergometer at 70% W. In a randomized crossover design, (1) placebo-flavored non-calorific mouth rinse, (2) L-menthol mouth rinse (0.01%), or (3) ice ingestion (1.25 g kg), was administered at 85% of participants' baseline TTE. Time to exhaustion, core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived effort, thermal comfort and thermal sensation were recorded.
From the point of administration at 85% of baseline TTE, exercise time was extended by 1% (placebo, 15 s), 6% (L-menthol, 82 s) and 7% (ice, 108 s), relative to baseline performance (P = 0.036), with no difference between L-menthol and ice (P > 0.05). Core temperature, skin temperature, and heart rate increased with time but did not differ between conditions (P > 0.05). Thermal sensation did not differ significantly but demonstrated a large effect size (P = 0.080; [Formula: see text] = 0.260).
These results indicate that both thermally cooling and non-thermally cooling oral stimuli have an equal and immediate behavioral, rather than physiological, influence on exhaustive exercise in the heat.
本研究旨在探讨在热环境(35°C)中,接近基础运动时间(85%)结束时,使用 L-薄荷醇漱口和冰沙摄入对力竭时间(time to exhaustion,TTE)的影响。
10 名男性参与者在自行车测力计上进行了 4 次 TTE 试验,运动强度为 70% W。采用随机交叉设计,(1)安慰剂口味的无热量漱口液,(2)L-薄荷醇漱口液(0.01%),或(3)冰摄入(1.25 g/kg),在参与者基础 TTE 的 85%时给予。记录 TTE、核心和皮肤温度、心率、感知努力评分、热舒适度和热感觉。
从基础 TTE 的 85%点开始给药,与基础表现相比,运动时间分别延长了 1%(安慰剂,15 秒)、6%(L-薄荷醇,82 秒)和 7%(冰,108 秒)(P=0.036),但 L-薄荷醇和冰之间无差异(P>0.05)。核心温度、皮肤温度和心率随时间增加,但各条件之间无差异(P>0.05)。热感觉无显著差异,但具有较大的效应量(P=0.080;[Formula: see text]=0.260)。
这些结果表明,热冷却和非热冷却的口腔刺激对热环境中的力竭运动具有相同且即时的行为影响,而不是生理影响。