• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对连续植入的具有电润湿表面的7毫米长牙科种植体进行1至7年的回顾性随访。

A 1-7 year retrospective follow-up on consecutively placed 7-mm-long dental implants with an electrowetted surface.

作者信息

Rosen Paul S, Sahlin Herman, Seemann Rudolf, Rosen Ari S

机构信息

Clinical Professor of Periodontics, Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Private Practice limited to Periodontics and Dental Implants, 907 Floral Vale Boulevard, Yardley, PA, 19067, USA.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Aug 23;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0136-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-018-0136-4
PMID:30136010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6105540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective consecutive case series study was performed to determinate the survival rate and implant stability of short (7 mm length) dental implants with an electrowetted hydrophilic surface that were in function from 1 to 7 years.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified and evaluated 86 consecutively placed 7-mm-long dental implants (ProActive, Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, England) in 75 patients. Analysis was performed for implant survival as well as implant stability, as measured by insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA).

RESULTS

Clinical follow-ups were performed from 1.0 to 7.0 years after implant placement (mean 4.0 ± 2.1 years). Two implants failed prior to loading resulting in a 5-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 97.7%. An additional late failure occurred at 60 months post-loading for a 7-year CSR of 94.8%. Mean insertion torque was 30.1 ± 7.4 Ncm and mean RFA at insertion was 73.6 ± 8.1 ISQ. Follow-up RFA measurements suggested that the achieved primary stability was maintained throughout the healing phase.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that treatment with short implants can be a predictable treatment option with high survival rate in sites with limited available bone.

摘要

背景

本回顾性连续病例系列研究旨在确定具有电润湿亲水性表面的短(7毫米长)牙种植体在1至7年功能期内的存活率和种植体稳定性。

方法

通过回顾性病历审查,对75例患者中连续植入的86颗7毫米长的牙种植体(ProActive,Neoss Ltd.,英国哈罗盖特)进行识别和评估。对种植体存活率以及通过植入扭矩(IT)和共振频率分析(RFA)测量的种植体稳定性进行分析。

结果

在种植体植入后1.0至7.0年进行临床随访(平均4.0±2.1年)。两颗种植体在加载前失败,导致5年累积存活率(CSR)为97.7%。加载后60个月发生了另外一例晚期失败,7年CSR为94.8%。平均植入扭矩为30.1±7.4 Ncm,植入时的平均RFA为73.6±8.1 ISQ。随访RFA测量表明,在整个愈合阶段,所实现的初始稳定性得以维持。

结论

本研究表明,在可用骨量有限的部位,使用短种植体治疗可以是一种具有高存活率的可预测治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6b/6105540/c4bf301517d9/40729_2018_136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6b/6105540/6f77ecd082d0/40729_2018_136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6b/6105540/c4bf301517d9/40729_2018_136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6b/6105540/6f77ecd082d0/40729_2018_136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e6b/6105540/c4bf301517d9/40729_2018_136_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A 1-7 year retrospective follow-up on consecutively placed 7-mm-long dental implants with an electrowetted surface.对连续植入的具有电润湿表面的7毫米长牙科种植体进行1至7年的回顾性随访。
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Aug 23;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0136-4.
2
One-year clinical and radiographic results with a novel hydrophilic titanium dental implant.新型亲水性钛牙种植体的一年临床及影像学结果
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Aug;16(4):511-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12022. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study on Hydrophilic Dental Implants Placed with and without Bone Augmentation Procedures.一项关于有无骨增量手术植入亲水性牙种植体的1年临床和影像学研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):498-506. doi: 10.1111/cid.12329. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants.影响Neoss种植牙共振频率分析(RFA)测量及5年生存率的因素。
Int J Dent. 2019 Apr 1;2019:3209872. doi: 10.1155/2019/3209872. eCollection 2019.
5
Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.拔牙时同期植入种植体的稳定性测量:一项队列前瞻性临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2005 Mar;76(3):391-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391.
6
Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion.使用适应骨密度的手术方案和纳入标准的初期种植体稳定性,对上颌无牙颌进行直接种植体加载。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S60-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00076.x.
7
One-year outcomes of Neoss bimodal implants. A prospective clinical, radiographic, and RFA study.Neoss 双模式种植体的一年随访结果。一项前瞻性临床、放射学和 RFA 研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
8
Immediate/Early function of Neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective case series study.即刻/早期使用 Neoss 种植体修复上颌和下颌后牙区:一项为期 18 个月的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00135.x. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
9
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.即刻加载种植体在拔牙窝中的应用:5 年临床结果的回顾性分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
10
A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla.一项关于在上颌骨中使用不同植入方案的锥形亲水种植体设计的一年随访研究。
Open Dent J. 2016 Dec 9;10:680-691. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010680. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward Digital Twin Development for Implant Placement Planning Using a Parametric Reduced-Order Model.利用参数化降阶模型实现用于种植体植入规划的数字孪生开发。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;11(1):84. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010084.
2
Comparison of Osteoimmunological and Microbiological Parameters of Extra Short and Longer Implants Loaded in the Posterior Mandible: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Study.后牙区下颌骨植入超短种植体与较长种植体的骨免疫学和微生物学参数比较:一项双侧对照随机临床研究。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Sep;55(3):238-247. doi: 10.15644/asc55/3/1.
3
Evaluation of osseintegration between traditional and modified hydrophilic titanium dental implants - Systematic analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.短种植体(6 毫米)与长种植体(11-15 毫米)联合鼻窦提升术:一项多中心、随机、对照临床试验的 3 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Apr;44(4):438-445. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12694. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙区短种植体与标准种植体的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
传统和亲水改性钛牙科种植体骨结合的评估——系统分析
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;11(2):176-181. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_44_20. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: A systematic review.
骨质疏松对牙种植体的影响:一项系统综述。
World J Orthop. 2015 Mar 18;6(2):311-5. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.311.
4
Incidence of First Implant Failure: A Retroprospective Study of 27 Years of Implant Operations at One Specialist Clinic.首次种植失败的发生率:对一家专科诊所27年种植手术的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e501-10. doi: 10.1111/cid.12277. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review.对随访期至少为10年的纵向研究中报告的牙种植体存活率和成功率的评估:一项系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;44(3):377-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
6
Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.一项随机对照试验的三年结果,该试验比较了在后部萎缩性无牙颌骨增量骨中由5毫米长种植体或更长种植体支持的假体。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Winter;7(4):383-95.
7
Diabetes and oral implant failure: a systematic review.糖尿病与口腔种植失败:系统评价。
J Dent Res. 2014 Sep;93(9):859-67. doi: 10.1177/0022034514538820. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
8
Crestal bone level changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta-analyses with at least 12 months' follow-up after functional loading.即刻种植体周围嵴顶骨水平变化:一项至少随访12个月功能负荷后的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Periodontol. 2014 Nov;85(11):1537-48. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130722. Epub 2014 May 2.
9
Reasons for failures of oral implants.口腔种植失败的原因。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Jun;41(6):443-76. doi: 10.1111/joor.12157. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.短(6毫米)微粗糙表面种植体的存活率:文献综述与荟萃分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 May;25(5):539-45. doi: 10.1111/clr.12125. Epub 2013 Feb 18.