• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种促进癌症试验招募过程并提高代表性不足人群研究素养的沟通工具的开发。

The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.

作者信息

Torres Samantha, de la Riva Erika E, Tom Laura S, Clayman Marla L, Taylor Chirisse, Dong Xinqi, Simon Melissa A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. St Clair, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):792-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0818-z.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0818-z
PMID:25820604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4591093/
Abstract

Despite increasing need to boost the recruitment of underrepresented populations into cancer trials and biobanking research, few tools exist for facilitating dialogue between researchers and potential research participants during the recruitment process. In this paper, we describe the initial processes of a user-centered design cycle to develop a standardized research communication tool prototype for enhancing research literacy among individuals from underrepresented populations considering enrollment in cancer research and biobanking studies. We present qualitative feedback and recommendations on the prototype's design and content from potential end users: five clinical trial recruiters and ten potential research participants recruited from an academic medical center. Participants were given the prototype (a set of laminated cards) and were asked to provide feedback about the tool's content, design elements, and word choices during semi-structured, in-person interviews. Results suggest that the prototype was well received by recruiters and patients alike. They favored the simplicity, lay language, and layout of the cards. They also noted areas for improvement, leading to card refinements that included the following: addressing additional topic areas, clarifying research processes, increasing the number of diverse images, and using alternative word choices. Our process for refining user interfaces and iterating content in early phases of design may inform future efforts to develop tools for use in clinical research or biobanking studies to increase research literacy.

摘要

尽管越来越需要促进将代表性不足的人群纳入癌症试验和生物样本库研究,但在招募过程中,促进研究人员与潜在研究参与者之间对话的工具却很少。在本文中,我们描述了以用户为中心的设计周期的初始过程,以开发一种标准化的研究沟通工具原型,以提高考虑参与癌症研究和生物样本库研究的代表性不足人群的研究素养。我们展示了来自潜在最终用户(五名临床试验招募人员和从一所学术医疗中心招募的十名潜在研究参与者)对该原型设计和内容的定性反馈及建议。参与者收到了该原型(一套覆膜卡片),并被要求在半结构化的面对面访谈中就工具的内容、设计元素和用词提供反馈。结果表明,该原型受到了招募人员和患者的一致好评。他们喜欢卡片的简洁性、通俗易懂的语言和布局。他们还指出了需要改进的地方,从而对卡片进行了完善,包括:涵盖更多主题领域、阐明研究流程、增加不同图像的数量以及使用替代用词。我们在设计早期阶段完善用户界面和迭代内容的过程,可能会为未来开发用于临床研究或生物样本库研究以提高研究素养的工具提供参考。

相似文献

1
The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.一种促进癌症试验招募过程并提高代表性不足人群研究素养的沟通工具的开发。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):792-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0818-z.
2
Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.使用新型交流工具提高不同少数群体的研究素养
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5.
3
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.开发用于癌症临床试验的简明决策支持工具:融合健康素养、学术研究和少数族裔患者观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5.
4
Underrepresentation of Hispanics and Other Minorities in Clinical Trials: Recruiters' Perspectives.临床试验中西班牙裔和其他少数族裔代表性不足:招募者的观点。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Apr;5(2):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0373-x. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Enrolling Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking.一项探索临床试验和生物样本库中纳入代表性不足人群的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 30;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
6
Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials.医疗服务提供者在招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验中的角色。
Cancer. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):465-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22436.
7
Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse).关于临床试验招募、生物样本采集和癌症研究的观点:来自霍德诺索尼(长屋之民)地区的人口科学。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):44-51. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1067-5.
8
Comparison of Health Communication Channels for Reaching Hispanics About Biobanking: a Pilot Trial.针对西班牙裔人群开展生物样本库相关健康传播渠道的比较:一项试点试验。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1214-7.
9
Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital.在少数民族接受治疗的地方招募:在一家医疗保障医院进行癌症临床试验招募的制度障碍。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
10
Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验的障碍:一项系统综述。
Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):228-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23157.

引用本文的文献

1
A Formative Evaluation of Interventions to Enhance Clinical Trial Diversity Guided by the Socioecological Model.以社会生态模型为指导的增强临床试验多样性干预措施的形成性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;17(14):2282. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142282.
2
Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review.少数民族成年患者参与临床试验的促进因素和障碍:一项系统综述。
Trials. 2025 Feb 22;26(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08769-y.
3
Consent for Research Involving Spanish- and English-Speaking Latinx Adults With Schizophrenia.西班牙语和英语母语拉丁裔成年人精神分裂症研究的同意书。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Apr 30;50(3):673-683. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad159.
4
Health Literacy and Clinical Trial Participation in French Cancer Patients: A National Survey.健康素养与法国癌症患者参与临床试验:全国性调查。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 28;29(5):3118-3129. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050253.
5
Health Disparities in Recruitment and Enrollment in Research.健康差异在研究招募和参与中。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2022 Feb;32(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2021.09.012.
6
Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States.与临床试验邀请和参与相关的人口统计学和健康行为因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792.
7
Perceived Institutional Barriers Among Clinical and Research Professionals: Minority Participation in Oncology Clinical Trials.临床和研究专业人员感知的机构障碍:少数族裔参与肿瘤学临床试验。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):e666-e675. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00970.
8
Using a Warm Hand-Off Approach to Enroll African American Caregivers in a Multi-Site Clinical Trial: The Handshake Protocol.采用温馨交接方式招募非裔美国家庭照顾者参与多中心临床试验:握手方案。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jan;41(1):142-147. doi: 10.1177/0733464821992920. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.通过公共图书馆合作开发提高服务不足人群研究素养的网络工具。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246098. eCollection 2021.
10
A population-based study of invitation to and participation in clinical trials among women with early-stage breast cancer.一项基于人群的早期乳腺癌女性临床试验邀请与参与情况研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(2):507-518. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05844-7. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network.提高癌症研究试验的多样性:癌症差异研究网络的故事。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y.
2
Participation in cancer clinical trials: why are patients not participating?参与癌症临床试验:患者为何不参与?
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):116-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13497264. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
3
A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans' participation in cancer clinical trials.一项系统评价影响非裔美国人参与癌症临床试验的因素。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jul;35(2):13-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
4
Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.提高低文化水平研究对象知情同意过程的研究:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2133-2. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
5
How to achieve informed consent for research from Spanish-speaking individuals with low literacy: a qualitative report.如何从低识字率的西班牙语个体中获得研究的知情同意:定性报告。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:172-82. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499990.
6
Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem.患者对参与癌症临床试验的决策满意度较高,但理解存在问题。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Mar;19(3):371-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0829-6. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
7
Evaluation of Cancer 101: an educational program for native settings.癌症101评估:针对本地环境的教育项目。
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep;25(3):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0046-5. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
8
Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?知情同意:患者理解多少以及理解什么?
Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):420-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010.
9
Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process.教育水平、主要语言以及对知情同意过程的理解。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):69-79. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.69.
10
Using principles of health literacy to enhance the informed consent process.运用健康素养原则加强知情同意过程。
AORN J. 2008 Jul;88(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.03.001.