Brown T A, Chorpita B F, Barlow D H
Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, Massachusetts 02215-2015, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 May;107(2):179-92. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.2.179.
Using outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders (N = 350), the authors tested several models of the structural relationships of dimensions of key features of selected emotional disorders and dimensions of the tripartite model of anxiety and depression. Results supported the discriminant validity of the 5 symptom domains examined (mood disorders: generalized anxiety disorder, GAD; panic disorder; obsessive-compulsive disorder; social phobia). Of various structural models evaluated, the best fitting involved a structure consistent with the tripartite model (e.g., the higher order factors, negative affect and positive affect, influenced emotional disorder factors in the expected manner). The latent factor, GAD, influenced the latent factor, autonomic arousal, in a direction consistent with recent laboratory findings (autonomic suppression). Findings are discussed in the context of the growing literature on higher order trait dimensions (e.g., negative affect) that may be of considerable importance to the understanding of the pathogenesis, course, and co-occurrence of emotional disorders.
作者以患有焦虑和情绪障碍的门诊患者(N = 350)为研究对象,测试了几种关于特定情绪障碍关键特征维度与焦虑和抑郁三方模型维度之间结构关系的模型。结果支持了所考察的5个症状领域(情绪障碍:广泛性焦虑障碍、惊恐障碍、强迫症、社交恐惧症)的区分效度。在评估的各种结构模型中,拟合度最佳的模型结构与三方模型一致(例如,高阶因素、消极情感和积极情感,以预期方式影响情绪障碍因素)。潜在因素广泛性焦虑障碍以与近期实验室研究结果(自主抑制)一致的方向影响潜在因素自主唤醒。本文将结合关于高阶特质维度(如消极情感)的文献不断增加的背景来讨论这些发现,这些高阶特质维度可能对理解情绪障碍的发病机制、病程及共病情况具有相当重要的意义。