Horta-Baas Gabriel, Romero-Figueroa María Del Socorro
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional 220, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Toluca, México.
División de Evaluación de la Investigación, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, México.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;22(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13332. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
Current studies demonstrate red blood cell distribution width (RDW) as a possible surrogate biomarker of inflammation. The objectives of the present study were to examine RDW in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), fibromyalgia (FM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to evaluate its clinical importance.
Six hundred and ninety-nine ambulatory patients were evaluated. RDW, hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed. In order to compare groups, a Kruskall-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn's test was applied. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate anisocytosis explanatory variables.
Red blood cell distribution width values differed significantly among groups. Post hoc analysis demonstrated a significant increase in RDW within RA versus OA groups (P < 0.001), active SpA versus OA (P < 0.001), RA versus FM (P < 0.001) and active SpA versus FM groups (P = 0.001). Presence of anisocytosis was useful to discriminate between active articular inflammatory versus non-inflammatory diseases with 48-95% sensitivity and 66-95% specificity. Multivariate analysis showed a six-fold increase in anisocytosis for the presence of a possible articular inflammatory disease.
In subjects with articular pain, RDW interpretation is a useful tool in clinical practice to distinguish between articular inflammatory and non-inflammatory joint diseases, as with CRP. RDW seems to be a surrogate marker of the inflammatory process.
目前的研究表明红细胞分布宽度(RDW)可能是炎症的替代生物标志物。本研究的目的是检测骨关节炎(OA)、纤维肌痛(FM)、类风湿关节炎(RA)和脊柱关节炎(SpA)患者的RDW,并评估其临床重要性。
对699名门诊患者进行评估。评估RDW、血红蛋白、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)。为比较各组,应用了带有事后邓恩检验的克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验。采用多元逻辑回归分析评估红细胞大小不均一性的解释变量。
各组间红细胞分布宽度值存在显著差异。事后分析表明,RA组与OA组相比RDW显著升高(P < 0.001),活动期SpA组与OA组相比(P < 0.001),RA组与FM组相比(P < 0.001),活动期SpA组与FM组相比(P = 0.001)。红细胞大小不均一性的存在有助于区分活动性关节炎症性疾病与非炎症性疾病,敏感性为48 - 95%,特异性为66 - 95%。多变量分析显示,可能存在关节炎症性疾病时红细胞大小不均一性增加6倍。
在有关节疼痛的患者中,RDW解读在临床实践中是区分关节炎症性和非炎症性关节疾病的有用工具,与CRP一样。RDW似乎是炎症过程的替代标志物。