Breton A, Gueudry P, Branger B, Le Baccon F-A, Thubert T, Arthuis C, Winer N, Dochez V
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital mère-enfant-maternité, CHU de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France.
Réseau sécurité naissance des pays de la Loire, 44000 Nantes, France.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Sep;46(9):632-638. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
Delivery mode in breech presentation (BP) is often controversial. Spontaneous labor, when vaginal birth seems safe, allows to better estimate uterus contractility, fetus' accommodation to maternal pelvis and optimize monitoring with a partograph. Induced labor in BP was usually contra-indicated. Lack of strong scientific evidence on this matter has permitted a progressive and careful evolution in obstetrical management, with the introduction of induced labor in BP. The aim of our study is to compare vaginal birth rates when labor is induced versus when spontaneous in BP. Maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality parameters were also evaluated.
In this retrospective study were included 206 patients carrying fetuses in BP, between June 2012 and June 2017. 182 of them had spontaneous labor and 24 experienced induced labor. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, BP after 34 weeks of gestation and vaginal delivery authorized by a senior obstetrician. Multiple pregnancy, birth before 34 weeks of gestation, uterine scar, planned caesarian section for BP, intra-uterine fetal death and medical termination of pregnancy were excluded. Induction of labor was performed for medical reason on a favorable cervix.
There was no significant difference in cesarean section rates between the two "induced" and "spontaneous" labor groups in BP (OR=1.69 [CI95%: 0.71-4.04]). We observed no difference between the two groups in neither perineum trauma nor post-partum hemorrhage. No difference was found between the two groups in rates of Apgar score<7 5minutes after birth, neonatal transfer, fetal trauma and pH at birth.
Despite our small population, it seems acceptable to propose induced labor for medical reason if cervix is favorable in BP if a protocol is available stating acceptability criteria for vaginal birth. It can avoid unnecessary caesarian section and allow better obstetrical outcome. It would be interesting to study fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality criteria in induced labor versus planned cesarean section when patients could be eligible for induced labor in BP.
臀位分娩的分娩方式常常存在争议。在阴道分娩看似安全的情况下,自然分娩能更好地评估子宫收缩力、胎儿对母体骨盆的适应情况,并通过产程图优化监测。臀位引产过去通常是禁忌的。由于缺乏关于此事的有力科学证据,产科管理得以逐步且谨慎地演变,引入了臀位引产。我们研究的目的是比较臀位引产与自然分娩时的阴道分娩率。还评估了母婴发病率和死亡率参数。
本回顾性研究纳入了2012年6月至2017年6月期间206例怀有臀位胎儿的患者。其中182例自然分娩,24例接受引产。纳入标准为单胎妊娠、妊娠34周后臀位且经资深产科医生批准阴道分娩。排除多胎妊娠、妊娠34周前分娩、子宫瘢痕、因臀位计划剖宫产、宫内胎儿死亡及医学性终止妊娠。因医学原因在宫颈条件适宜时进行引产。
臀位的“引产”组和“自然分娩”组之间剖宫产率无显著差异(OR = 1.69 [95%CI:0.71 - 4.04])。我们观察到两组在会阴创伤和产后出血方面均无差异。两组在出生后5分钟阿氏评分<7、新生儿转院、胎儿创伤及出生时pH值方面也无差异。
尽管我们的样本量较小,但如果有一份规定阴道分娩可接受标准的方案,对于宫颈条件适宜的臀位患者,因医学原因提议引产似乎是可以接受的。这可以避免不必要的剖宫产,并带来更好的产科结局。当患者符合臀位引产条件时,研究引产与计划剖宫产时的母婴发病率和死亡率标准会很有意思。