Santos Ana Eliza Castanho Garrini Dos, Bussadori Sandra Kalil, Pinto Marcelo Mendes, Pantano Junior Dácio Antonio, Brugnera Aldo, Zanin Fátima Antonia Aparecida, Rodrigues Maria Fernanda Setúbal Destro, Motta Lara Jansiski, Horliana Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini
Postgraduate Program in Biophotonics Appliedto Health Sciences, Nove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho, UNINOVE, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 4;8(9):e021414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021414.
In-office tooth whitening treatment using violet light emited diode (LED) (405 nm) is a novel bleaching method that causes less sensitivity while offering the same effectiveness as the gold standard (35% hydrogen peroxide, HO). This study describes a protocol for the first randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effects of the two methods.
Eighty patients will be divided into four groups: G1 violet LED; G2 violet LED +35% carbamide peroxide; G3 35% HO and G4 violet LED +gingivoplasty. Colour will be measured at baseline, immediately after the first session and at the 15 and 180 days follow-up using the Vita Classical and the digital Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Vita, Zahnfabrik, Germany). Sensitivity after whitening will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and at each session in all groups and in all follow-ups. The tissue removed during gingivoplasty (G4) will be submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for the determination of inflammatory changes caused by violet LED. The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) will be evaluated before, as well as at established time point controls. The results will be expressed as mean and SD values. After determining the normality of the data, a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used for the comparison of data with normal distribution and the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for data with non-normal distribution. A p<0.05 will be considered indicative of statistical significance. After determining the normality of the data, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for non-parametric data. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and the Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing data from the PIDAQ.
This protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of UniversidadeNove de Julho (certificate: 2.034.518). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
NCT03192852; Pre-results.
使用紫光发光二极管(LED)(405纳米)进行诊室牙齿美白治疗是一种新型漂白方法,其敏感性较低,同时具有与金标准(35%过氧化氢,HO)相同的效果。本研究描述了首个随机对照临床试验方案,以比较这两种方法的效果。
80名患者将被分为四组:G1紫光LED组;G2紫光LED+35%过氧化脲组;G3 35% HO组和G4紫光LED+牙龈成形术组。使用Vita经典比色板和数字式Easyshade V分光光度计(德国维它公司,Vita,Zahnfabrik)在基线、首次治疗后即刻以及15天和180天随访时测量颜色。所有组在基线、每次治疗时以及所有随访中,使用视觉模拟量表测量美白后的敏感性。牙龈成形术(G4)过程中切除的组织将进行免疫组织化学分析,以确定紫光LED引起的炎症变化。在治疗前以及既定的时间点对照时评估牙科美学心理社会影响问卷(PIDAQ)。结果将以均值和标准差表示。在确定数据的正态性后,对于正态分布的数据将使用单向重复测量方差分析进行比较,对于非正态分布的数据将使用Kruskal-Wallis检验。p<0.05将被视为具有统计学意义。在确定数据的正态性后,对于非参数数据将使用Kruskal-Wallis检验。将使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)和Wilcoxon检验来比较PIDAQ的数据。
本方案已获得七月九日大学人类研究伦理委员会的批准(证书编号:2.034.518)。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。
NCT-03192852;预结果。