Minnerop Martina, Gliem Carla, Kornblum Cornelia
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Department of Neurology and Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 21;9:646. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00646. eCollection 2018.
Neuroimaging in myotonic dystrophies provided a major contribution to the insight into brain involvement which is highly prevalent in these multisystemic disorders. Particular in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1, conventional MRI first revealed hyperintense white matter lesions, predominantly localized in the anterior temporal lobe. Brain atrophy and ventricle enlargement were additional early findings already described almost 30 years ago. Since then, more advanced and sophisticated imaging methods have been applied in Myotonic Dystrophy Types 1 and 2. Involvement of actually normal appearing white matter and widespread cortical affection in PET studies were key results toward the recognition of diffuse and not only focally localized brain pathology . Later, structural abnormalities of both, gray and white matter, have been found in both forms of the disorder, albeit more prominent in myotonic dystrophy type 1. In Type 1, a consistent widespread cortical and subcortical involvement of gray and white matter affecting all lobes, brainstem and cerebellum was observed. Spectroscopy studies gave additional evidence of neuronal and glial damage in both types. Central questions regarding the origin and spatiotemporal evolution of the CNS involvement and its relevance for clinical symptoms had already been raised 30 years ago, however are still not answered. Results of correlation analyses between neuroimaging and clinical parameters are diverse and with few exceptions not well reproducible across studies. It may be related to the fact that most of the reported studies included only small numbers of subjects, sometimes even not separating Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 from Type 2. But this heterogeneity may also support the current point of view that the clinical impairments are not simply linked to specific and regionally circumscribed structural or functional brain alterations. It seems more convincing that disturbed networks build the functional and structural substrate of clinical symptoms in these disorders as it is proposed in other neuropsychiatric diseases. Consecutively, structural and functional network analyses may provide additional information regarding the link between brain pathology and clinical symptoms. Up to now, only cross-sectional neuroimaging studies have been published. To analyze the temporal evolution of brain affection, longitudinal studies are urgently needed, and systematic natural history data would be useful to identify potential biomarkers for therapeutic studies.
对强直性肌营养不良症的神经影像学研究极大地增进了我们对脑部受累情况的了解,脑部受累在这些多系统疾病中极为常见。特别是在1型强直性肌营养不良症中,传统MRI首次发现白质高信号病变,主要位于颞叶前部。脑萎缩和脑室扩大是近30年前就已描述的其他早期发现。从那时起,更先进、更精密的成像方法已应用于1型和2型强直性肌营养不良症。PET研究中实际外观正常的白质受累和广泛的皮质病变是认识到弥漫性而非仅局灶性脑部病变的关键结果。后来,在这两种疾病形式中均发现了灰质和白质的结构异常,尽管在1型强直性肌营养不良症中更为突出。在1型中,观察到灰质和白质一致地广泛累及所有脑叶、脑干和小脑的皮质和皮质下区域。光谱学研究进一步证明了两种类型中均存在神经元和胶质细胞损伤。关于中枢神经系统受累的起源、时空演变及其与临床症状的相关性等核心问题早在30年前就已提出,但至今仍未得到解答。神经影像学与临床参数之间的相关性分析结果各不相同,除少数例外,在各项研究中均难以很好地重复。这可能与以下事实有关:大多数已报道的研究仅纳入了少量受试者,有时甚至未将1型强直性肌营养不良症与2型区分开来。但这种异质性也可能支持当前的观点,即临床损害并非简单地与特定的、局部限定的结构或功能性脑部改变相关联。正如在其他神经精神疾病中所提出的那样,似乎更有说服力的是,紊乱的网络构成了这些疾病临床症状的功能和结构基础。因此,结构和功能网络分析可能会提供有关脑部病变与临床症状之间联系的更多信息。到目前为止,仅发表了横断面神经影像学研究。为了分析脑部病变的时间演变,迫切需要进行纵向研究,而系统的自然史数据将有助于确定治疗研究的潜在生物标志物。