Schildmann Jan, Salloch Sabine, Peters Tim, Henking Tanja, Vollmann Jochen
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Halle, Germany.
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Bochum, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Aug 15;35(3):Doc31. doi: 10.3205/zma001177. eCollection 2018.
The presentation and discussion of the content, methodology and evaluation results of a course on "Risks and Errors in Medical Science", adopting an integrated approach for the teaching of ethical, legal and communicative aspects. Written, structured evaluation using the adapted evaluation form "Evasys" as well as open questions on positive and negative aspects of the course and assessment of the effects thereof from the participants' viewpoint. The free text responses are evaluated according to the principles of qualitative content analysis. Thirty-two from thirty-six participants (88.9%) evaluated the course in written form. The value for the global assessment of the course is a 1.7 (1=very good, 6=unsatisfactory). The self-assessed learning success was evaluated with a 1.9. In the qualitative analysis of the free text answers the case orientated teaching, the use of simulated patients as well as the legal content and the ethical models of the doctor-patient relationship were evaluated positively. Negative aspects of the course were, among other things, the weighting of the contents and the limited amount of time allotted. Impacts and changes were identified by the students in terms of knowledge of legal aspects, reflection on their own action and the training and further development of communication aptitudes. The students saw the relevance of the course for their studies especially in the supplement to the compulsory curriculum as well as in the significance of the content of medical law. The experience of the authors and the written evaluation results show that the concept of integrated teaching can be implemented in medical studies and that it is predominantly evaluated positively. The primary challenges are the weighting of the different contents and methods as well as the comparatively high demand for coordination among representatives of various disciplines.
介绍并讨论了一门“医学科学中的风险与错误”课程的内容、方法和评估结果,该课程采用综合方法教授伦理、法律和沟通方面的内容。使用改编后的“Evasys”评估表进行书面结构化评估,以及就课程的积极和消极方面提出开放性问题,并从参与者的角度评估其效果。根据定性内容分析原则对自由文本回复进行评估。三十六名参与者中有三十二名(88.9%)以书面形式对课程进行了评估。该课程的整体评估值为1.7(1=非常好,6=不满意)。自我评估的学习成效评分为1.9。在对自由文本答案的定性分析中,以案例为导向的教学、模拟患者的使用以及医患关系的法律内容和伦理模式得到了积极评价。该课程的消极方面包括内容的权重以及分配的时间有限等。学生们在法律方面的知识、对自身行为的反思以及沟通能力的培训和进一步发展方面发现了课程的影响和变化。学生们认为该课程对他们的学习具有相关性尤其是作为对必修课程的补充以及医学法律内容的重要性。作者的经验和书面评估结果表明,综合教学的理念可以在医学学习中实施,并且主要得到了积极评价。主要挑战在于不同内容和方法的权重以及各学科代表之间相对较高的协调要求。