Suppr超能文献

在试验中进行试验:一项关于利益相关者对临床试验中方法学研究常规采用的障碍和促进因素看法的定性研究。

Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials.

作者信息

Rick Jo, Clarke Mike, Montgomery Alan A, Brocklehurst Paul, Evans Rachel, Bower Peter

机构信息

North West Hub for Trials Methodology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, Centre for Public Health, Queens University, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Sep 10;19(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2862-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials are the cornerstone of evidence-based health care, yet many trials struggle with recruitment and retention. All too often the methodologies employed to address these problems are not evidence-based, as rigorous methodological research on these issues is rare. The current research sought to identify barriers to the routine implementation of methodology research around recruitment and retention.

METHODS

All registered UK clinical trials unit directors were sent a short questionnaire and invited to interview. Representatives of funding bodies and other stakeholders were also approached. Interviews were recorded and the content analysed.

RESULTS

Data were grouped into four themes: acceptance of the need for methodological research; trial funding and development; trial processes; and organisational factors. The need to improve the evidence base for trials methodology is well established, but numerous barriers to implementation were perceived.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge and expertise required to routinely implement methodology research exists within the current research structures, and there are clear opportunities to develop the evidence base. However, for this to be achieved there is also a need for clear strategic coordination within the sector and promotion of the necessary resources.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验是循证医疗保健的基石,但许多试验在招募和留住参与者方面面临困难。解决这些问题所采用的方法往往缺乏循证依据,因为针对这些问题的严谨方法学研究很少见。当前的研究旨在确定围绕招募和留住参与者的方法学研究常规实施的障碍。

方法

向所有注册的英国临床试验单位主任发送了一份简短问卷并邀请他们接受访谈。还联系了资助机构和其他利益相关者的代表。访谈进行了录音并对内容进行了分析。

结果

数据分为四个主题:对方法学研究必要性的认可;试验资金与开展;试验流程;以及组织因素。改善试验方法学循证依据的必要性已得到充分确立,但人们意识到存在许多实施障碍。

结论

当前的研究结构中存在常规实施方法学研究所需的知识和专业技能,并且有明显的机会来发展循证依据。然而,要实现这一点,该领域还需要明确的战略协调以及对必要资源的推广。

相似文献

10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

6
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.生物医学研究:提高价值,减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验