Balcells María Elvira, Ruiz-Tagle Cinthya, Tiznado Camila, García Patricia, Naves Rodrigo
Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile.
Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Av. Independencia 1027, Santiago, Chile.
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018 Sep;112:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
A simple blood test for detecting active tuberculosis (TB) could be key to this epidemic containment, given that a large proportion of patients are unable to produce sputum for testing. Currently available interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are inadequate to diagnose active TB, with reported pooled sensitivity and specificity both under 81%.
To explore whether cytokines/chemokines other than interferon-γ in response to long-term cell stimulation could improve the ability to distinguish between different TB infection status.
We prospectively enrolled subjects with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB and their household contacts in Santiago. All contacts were tested with IGRA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained and antigen-specific stimulated for 72 h before collecting their culture supernatants.
Subjects with active TB displayed markedly low cytokines/chemokines secretion upon PBMC stimulation, with lower GM-CSF being the best differentiator from IGRA(+) contacts, with 71% (95% CI 53-85) sensitivity, 86% (95% CI 65-97) specificity and AUC = 0.79 (p = 0.0003). On the other hand, when compared to the uninfected IGRA(-) contacts, higher level of IL-2 secretion was the best indicator of active TB, with 73.5% (95% CI 56-87) sensitivity, 85% (95% CI 66-96) specificity and AUC = 0.79 (p = 0.0001). No single cytokine/chemokine released upon stimulation could accurately differentiate between active TB and all TB contacts grouped together.
GM-CSF and IL-2 provided the best yield to differentiate active TB from latent TB and from TB uninfected, respectively, with higher specificities than that reported for IGRAs. However, none of both resulted sensitive enough to be used as a stand-alone biomarker for active TB.
鉴于很大一部分患者无法咳出痰液进行检测,一种用于检测活动性肺结核(TB)的简单血液检测可能是控制这一流行病的关键。目前可用的干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)不足以诊断活动性肺结核,据报道其合并敏感性和特异性均低于81%。
探讨长期细胞刺激后除干扰素-γ之外的细胞因子/趋化因子是否能提高区分不同结核感染状态的能力。
我们前瞻性招募了圣地亚哥新诊断的肺结核患者及其家庭接触者。所有接触者均接受IGRA检测。获取外周血单个核细胞,并在收集培养上清液前进行抗原特异性刺激72小时。
活动性肺结核患者在PBMC刺激后细胞因子/趋化因子分泌明显较低,较低的GM-CSF是区分IGRA(+)接触者的最佳指标,敏感性为71%(95%CI 53-85),特异性为86%(95%CI 65-97),AUC = 0.79(p = 0.0003)。另一方面,与未感染的IGRA(-)接触者相比,较高水平的IL-2分泌是活动性肺结核的最佳指标,敏感性为73.5%(95%CI 56-87),特异性为85%(95%CI 66-96),AUC = 0.79(p = 0.0001)。刺激后释放的单一细胞因子/趋化因子均无法准确区分活动性肺结核与所有归为一组的结核接触者。
GM-CSF和IL-2分别为区分活动性肺结核与潜伏性肺结核以及未感染结核提供了最佳结果,其特异性高于IGRAs报道的特异性。然而,两者均不够敏感,不足以用作活动性肺结核的独立生物标志物。