Warnes Harriet, Helliwell Rebecca, Pearson Sam Matthew, Ajjan Ramzi A
School of Medical Sciences, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):1831-1851. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0496-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Despite advances in insulin therapies, patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have a shorter life span due to hyperglycaemia-induced vascular disease and hypoglycaemic complications secondary to insulin therapy. Restricting therapy for T1DM to insulin replacement is perhaps an over-simplistic approach, and we focus in this work on reviewing the role of adjuvant therapy in this population. Current data suggest that adding metformin to insulin therapy in T1DM temporarily lowers HbA1c and reduces weight and insulin requirements, but this treatment fails to show a longer-term glycaemic benefit. Agents in the sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2) class demonstrate the greatest promise in correcting hyperglycaemia, but there are safety concerns in relation to the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1) show a modest effect on glycaemia, if any, but significantly reduce weight, which may make them suitable for use in overweight T1DM patients. Treatment with pramlintide is not widely available worldwide, although there is evidence to indicate that this agent reduces both HbA1c and weight in T1DM. A criticism of adjuvant studies is the heavy reliance on HbA1c as the primary endpoint while generally ignoring other glycaemic parameters. Moreover, vascular risk markers and measures of insulin resistance-important considerations in individuals with a longer T1DM duration-are yet to be fully investigated following adjuvant therapies. Finally, studies to date have made the assumption that T1DM patients are a homogeneous group of individuals who respond similarly to adjuvant therapies, which is unlikely to be the case. Future longer-term adjuvant studies investigating different glycaemic parameters, surrogate vascular markers and harder clinical outcomes will refine our understanding of the roles of such therapies in various subgroups of T1DM patients.
尽管胰岛素治疗取得了进展,但1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者由于高血糖诱导的血管疾病以及胰岛素治疗继发的低血糖并发症,寿命较短。将T1DM的治疗局限于胰岛素替代可能是一种过于简单的方法,在这项工作中,我们重点回顾辅助治疗在这一人群中的作用。目前的数据表明,在T1DM患者的胰岛素治疗中添加二甲双胍可暂时降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平,减轻体重并减少胰岛素需求,但这种治疗未能显示出长期的血糖获益。钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT-2)类药物在纠正高血糖方面显示出最大的前景,但存在与糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险相关的安全问题。胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂(GLP-1)对血糖的影响(如果有)较小,但能显著减轻体重,这可能使其适用于超重的T1DM患者。尽管有证据表明普兰林肽可降低T1DM患者的HbA1c水平和体重,但该药物在全球范围内尚未广泛应用。辅助治疗研究的一个问题是严重依赖HbA1c作为主要终点,而通常忽略其他血糖参数。此外,对于病程较长的T1DM患者而言,重要的血管风险标志物和胰岛素抵抗指标在辅助治疗后尚未得到充分研究。最后,迄今为止的研究假设T1DM患者是一个对辅助治疗反应相似的同质群体,但实际情况可能并非如此。未来针对不同血糖参数、替代血管标志物和更严格临床结局的长期辅助治疗研究,将加深我们对这类治疗在T1DM患者不同亚组中作用的理解。