• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处理道德垂直隐喻时认知与情感的双重机制

A Dual Mechanism of Cognition and Emotion in Processing Moral-Vertical Metaphors.

作者信息

Zhai Dongxue, Guo Yaling, Lu Zhongyi

机构信息

College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.

School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01554. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01554
PMID:30210396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6122286/
Abstract

A moral concept involves two main factors: moral cognition (indicated by morality) and emotion (indicated by emotionality). The cognitive mechanism underlying moral metaphors on the vertical dimension (e.g., moral-up, immoral-down) was investigated in three experiments using implicit association tests. The results of Experiment 1 show a stronger association of "moral-up, immoral-down" between words high in morality and vertical space than between words low in morality and vertical space, which indicates that cognitive factors of morality facilitate the processing of vertical spatial metaphors of moral concepts. Experiment 2, employing moral words different in emotionality, reveals a stronger association of "moral-up, immoral-down" between words high in emotionality and vertical space than between words low in emotionality and vertical space, which shows that emotional factors of morality facilitate the processing of vertical spatial metaphors of moral concepts. A comparison between the two experiments suggests a faster response to emotion than to moral cognition and similar association strengths of the two factors with verticality. Using words high in morality and emotionality, Experiment 3 shows that a combination of the two conditions (i.e., high morality and high emotionality) leads to a stronger tie with verticality than either condition. The above three experiments indicate that both moral cognition and emotion facilitate the processing of vertical spatial metaphor of moral concepts, and the forces of the two, which jointly affect the metaphorical connection between morality and verticality, are basically equal, although the processing of emotionality is faster than that of morality.

摘要

一个道德概念涉及两个主要因素

道德认知(由道德性表示)和情感(由情感性表示)。在三项实验中,使用内隐联想测验研究了垂直维度上道德隐喻(如道德-向上,不道德-向下)背后的认知机制。实验1的结果表明,道德性高的词语与垂直空间之间的“道德-向上,不道德-向下”关联比道德性低的词语与垂直空间之间更强,这表明道德的认知因素促进了道德概念垂直空间隐喻的加工。实验2使用情感性不同的道德词语,结果显示情感性高的词语与垂直空间之间的“道德-向上,不道德-向下”关联比情感性低的词语与垂直空间之间更强,这表明道德的情感因素促进了道德概念垂直空间隐喻的加工。两项实验的比较表明,对情感的反应比对道德认知的反应更快,并且这两个因素与垂直性的关联强度相似。实验3使用道德性和情感性都高的词语,结果表明两种条件(即高道德性和高情感性)的组合与垂直性的联系比任何一种条件都更强。上述三项实验表明,道德认知和情感都促进了道德概念垂直空间隐喻的加工,并且尽管情感性的加工比道德性的加工更快,但二者共同影响道德与垂直性之间隐喻联系的力量基本相等。

相似文献

1
A Dual Mechanism of Cognition and Emotion in Processing Moral-Vertical Metaphors.处理道德垂直隐喻时认知与情感的双重机制
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01554. eCollection 2018.
2
Moral-up first, immoral-down last: the time course of moral metaphors on a vertical dimension.道德上的在上,不道德的在下:垂直维度上道德隐喻的时间进程。
Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 2;27(4):247-56. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000528.
3
Keeping Morality "on the Straight" and Never "on the Bend": Metaphorical Representations of Moral Concepts in Straightness and Curvature.让道德“保持正直”,绝不在“弯曲”:道德概念在直线与曲线中的隐喻表征
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;13(4):295. doi: 10.3390/bs13040295.
4
Immorality backward, morality forward? Metaphorical morality in Chinese-English bilinguals.不道德向后,道德向前?汉英双语者的隐喻性道德观
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01225-w. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Horizontal Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Cross-Cultural Study of Han Chinese Students and Ethnic Minority Hui Students in China.道德的水平空间隐喻:对中国汉族学生和少数民族回族学生的跨文化研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 5;9:1145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01145. eCollection 2018.
6
Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space.隐喻一致效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测了在垂直空间中呈现的两极概念的分类时间。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):726-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024955. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
7
Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space.口语情感词汇在垂直空间上的跨模态隐喻映射。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01205. eCollection 2015.
8
Language Nativeness Modulates Physiological Responses to Moral vs. Immoral Concepts in Chinese-English Bilinguals: Evidence from Event-Related Potential and Psychophysiological Measures.语言母语程度调节汉英双语者对道德与不道德概念的生理反应:来自事件相关电位和心理生理测量的证据。
Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 2;13(11):1543. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111543.
9
The mechanism of valence-space metaphors: ERP evidence for affective word processing.价-空间隐喻的机制:情感词汇加工的事件相关电位证据
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099479. eCollection 2014.
10
Colours' Impact on Morality: Evidence from Event-related Potentials.颜色对道德的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 22;6:38373. doi: 10.1038/srep38373.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model.情感驱动的道德评价:基于漂移扩散模型的机制研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Oct 4;14(10):1005. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14101005.
2
Immorality backward, morality forward? Metaphorical morality in Chinese-English bilinguals.不道德向后,道德向前?汉英双语者的隐喻性道德观
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01225-w. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
Keeping Morality "on the Straight" and Never "on the Bend": Metaphorical Representations of Moral Concepts in Straightness and Curvature.让道德“保持正直”,绝不在“弯曲”:道德概念在直线与曲线中的隐喻表征
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;13(4):295. doi: 10.3390/bs13040295.
4
Symbolic meanings of ordinary city streets and their trees.普通城市街道及其树木的象征意义。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1080025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1080025. eCollection 2022.
5
Can second language metaphorical competence be taught through instructional intervention? A meta-analysis.第二语言隐喻能力能否通过教学干预来教授?一项元分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:1065803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065803. eCollection 2022.
6
Morphological Metaphor Mapping of Moral Concepts in Chinese Culture.中国文化中道德概念的形态隐喻映射
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 17;11:554061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554061. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Moral-up first, immoral-down last: the time course of moral metaphors on a vertical dimension.道德上的在上,不道德的在下:垂直维度上道德隐喻的时间进程。
Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 2;27(4):247-56. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000528.
2
Good is up-spatial metaphors in action observation.在动作观察中,善是向上的空间隐喻。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 20;6:1605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605. eCollection 2015.
3
Affective valence facilitates spatial detection on vertical axis: shorter time strengthens effect.情感效价促进垂直轴上的空间检测:时间越短效果越强。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 24;6:277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00277. eCollection 2015.
4
Emotional valence and physical space: limits of interaction.情绪效价与物理空间:互动的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Apr;38(2):375-85. doi: 10.1037/a0024979. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
5
When left is "right". Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts.当“左”即“右”时。运动流畅性塑造抽象概念。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):419-22. doi: 10.1177/0956797611401755. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
6
The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters.抽象词的表达:为什么情感很重要。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):14-34. doi: 10.1037/a0021446.
7
Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers.抽象概念的体现:右利手和左利手中的好与坏。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):351-67. doi: 10.1037/a0015854.
8
Why the sunny side is up: association between affect and vertical position.为何阳光面朝上:情感与垂直位置之间的关联。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Apr;15(4):243-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x.
9
The effect of success and failure on space localization.成功与失败对空间定位的影响。
J Pers. 1957 Dec;25(6):752-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1957.tb01563.x.
10
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.理解与运用内隐联想测验:I. 一种改进的计分算法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.