Baveye Philippe C, Otten Wilfred, Kravchenko Alexandra, Balseiro-Romero María, Beckers Éléonore, Chalhoub Maha, Darnault Christophe, Eickhorst Thilo, Garnier Patricia, Hapca Simona, Kiranyaz Serkan, Monga Olivier, Mueller Carsten W, Nunan Naoise, Pot Valérie, Schlüter Steffen, Schmidt Hannes, Vogel Hans-Jörg
UMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, rance.
School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;9:1929. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01929. eCollection 2018.
Over the last 60 years, soil microbiologists have accumulated a wealth of experimental data showing that the bulk, macroscopic parameters (e.g., granulometry, pH, soil organic matter, and biomass contents) commonly used to characterize soils provide insufficient information to describe quantitatively the activity of soil microorganisms and some of its outcomes, like the emission of greenhouse gasses. Clearly, new, more appropriate macroscopic parameters are needed, which reflect better the spatial heterogeneity of soils at the microscale (i.e., the pore scale) that is commensurate with the habitat of many microorganisms. For a long time, spectroscopic and microscopic tools were lacking to quantify processes at that scale, but major technological advances over the last 15 years have made suitable equipment available to researchers. In this context, the objective of the present article is to review progress achieved to date in the significant research program that has ensued. This program can be rationalized as a sequence of steps, namely the quantification and modeling of the physical-, (bio)chemical-, and microbiological properties of soils, the integration of these different perspectives into a unified theory, its upscaling to the macroscopic scale, and, eventually, the development of new approaches to measure macroscopic soil characteristics. At this stage, significant progress has been achieved on the physical front, and to a lesser extent on the (bio)chemical one as well, both in terms of experiments and modeling. With regard to the microbial aspects, although a lot of work has been devoted to the modeling of bacterial and fungal activity in soils at the pore scale, the appropriateness of model assumptions cannot be readily assessed because of the scarcity of relevant experimental data. For significant progress to be made, it is crucial to make sure that research on the microbial components of soil systems does not keep lagging behind the work on the physical and (bio)chemical characteristics. Concerning the subsequent steps in the program, very little integration of the various disciplinary perspectives has occurred so far, and, as a result, researchers have not yet been able to tackle the scaling up to the macroscopic level. Many challenges, some of them daunting, remain on the path ahead. Fortunately, a number of these challenges may be resolved by brand new measuring equipment that will become commercially available in the very near future.
在过去的60年里,土壤微生物学家积累了大量实验数据,表明常用于表征土壤的大量宏观参数(如粒度、pH值、土壤有机质和生物量含量)提供的信息不足以定量描述土壤微生物的活性及其一些结果,如温室气体排放。显然,需要新的、更合适的宏观参数,这些参数能更好地反映土壤在微观尺度(即孔隙尺度)上的空间异质性,而这种异质性与许多微生物的栖息地相对应。长期以来,缺乏用于量化该尺度过程的光谱和显微镜工具,但过去15年的重大技术进步为研究人员提供了合适的设备。在此背景下,本文的目的是回顾在随之而来的重大研究项目中迄今取得的进展。该项目可合理地分为一系列步骤,即对土壤的物理、(生物)化学和微生物特性进行量化和建模,将这些不同的观点整合为一个统一的理论,将其扩展到宏观尺度,最终开发测量宏观土壤特征的新方法。在现阶段,在物理方面已经取得了重大进展,在(生物)化学方面也取得了较小程度的进展,无论是在实验还是建模方面。关于微生物方面,尽管已经做了很多工作来对孔隙尺度下土壤中细菌和真菌的活性进行建模,但由于相关实验数据稀缺,模型假设的适用性难以轻易评估。为了取得重大进展,至关重要的是要确保对土壤系统微生物成分的研究不落后于对物理和(生物)化学特性的研究。关于该项目的后续步骤,到目前为止,各学科观点的整合非常少,因此,研究人员尚未能够解决扩展到宏观层面的问题。前方的道路上仍有许多挑战,其中一些令人生畏。幸运的是,一些挑战可能会通过在不久的将来即将上市的全新测量设备得到解决。