Penagos Martin, Eifan Aarif O, Durham Stephen R, Scadding Guy W
Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Division of Respiratory Science, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY UK.
Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2018;5(3):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s40521-018-0176-2. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy are effective for allergic rhinitis. An important question is whether allergen immunotherapy provides a sustained clinical effect after treatment cessation. In view of potential side effects, cost and the necessary patient commitment, long-term benefit is an important consideration for the recommendation of immunotherapy over standard pharmacotherapy.
In this review, we analyse the existing evidence for long-term effects of both routes of administration in the context of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trials that included a follow-up phase of at least 1 year after treatment cessation.
Overall, evidence suggests that 3 years of either subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy result in clinical benefit and immunological changes consistent with allergen-specific tolerance sustained for at least 2-3 years after treatment cessation.
The data presented here support recommendations in international guidelines that both routes of administration should be continued for a minimum of 3 years. Gaps in the evidence remain regarding the long-term efficacy of immunotherapy for perennial rhinitis and studies performed in children.
皮下和舌下免疫疗法对过敏性鼻炎有效。一个重要的问题是,停止治疗后变应原免疫疗法是否能提供持续的临床效果。鉴于潜在的副作用、成本以及患者所需的依从性,与标准药物治疗相比,长期获益是推荐免疫疗法时的一个重要考量因素。
在本综述中,我们分析了双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验中这两种给药途径长期效果的现有证据,这些试验包括治疗停止后至少1年的随访期。
总体而言,证据表明3年的皮下或舌下免疫疗法可带来临床获益,且免疫变化与治疗停止后至少持续2至3年的变应原特异性耐受相符。
此处呈现的数据支持国际指南中的建议,即两种给药途径均应持续至少3年。关于常年性鼻炎免疫疗法的长期疗效以及在儿童中开展的研究,证据仍存在空白。