• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电话干预与面对面认知行为疗法治疗儿童强迫症的结局的调节因素和预测因素:一项非劣效 RCT 的初步证据。

Moderators and predictors of outcomes in telephone delivered compared to face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: preliminary evidence from a non-inferiority RCT.

机构信息

a Research School of Psychology, Australian National University , Canberra , Australia.

b School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University , Brisbane , Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Sep;48(5):353-368. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1513555. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1080/16506073.2018.1513555
PMID:30221589
Abstract

This study provides a preliminary exploration of factors which differentially predict treatment response to telephone-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (TCBT) compared to face-to-face CBT (CBT) in a randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of 72 children (aged 11-18 years) with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Potential moderator variables, their interaction with treatment group (CBT, TCBT) and baseline levels of OCD severity were entered into separate regression models where the primary outcome measure was the post-intervention Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total score (CYBOCS). Separate regressions were also used to test associations between predictors and outcome controlling for pretreatment CYBOCS. Only pretreatment level of parent-rated child peer problems moderated the effects of the two interventions on CYBOCS severity at post-treatment. After controlling for baseline CYBOCS, only family accommodation rated by mothers predicted poorer outcomes in both groups. While CBT and TCBT may be equally effective for adolescents with OCD, the current results tentatively suggest that higher baseline level of peer problems strengthened the response to therapy for youth receiving TCBT and the predictor analyses reinforce the importance of directly addressing family accommodation during CBT for paediatric OCD regardless of delivery mode. Limitations of the current findings and directions for future work are discussed.

摘要

本研究初步探讨了在一项针对 72 名(年龄在 11-18 岁)患有强迫症(OCD)的儿童的随机非劣效对照试验中,与面对面认知行为疗法(CBT)相比,电话传递认知行为疗法(TCBT)治疗反应的预测因素。潜在的调节变量及其与治疗组(CBT、TCBT)和 OCD 严重程度的基线水平的交互作用被纳入单独的回归模型中,主要的结果衡量标准是干预后的儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表总分(CYBOCS)。还分别使用回归来检验预测因素与结果之间的关联,控制预处理的 CYBOCS。只有父母评定的儿童同伴问题的预处理水平调节了两种干预措施对治疗后 CYBOCS 严重程度的影响。在控制基线 CYBOCS 后,只有母亲评定的家庭适应能力预测了两组的预后较差。虽然 CBT 和 TCBT 对青少年 OCD 可能同样有效,但目前的结果初步表明,更高的基线同伴问题水平增强了接受 TCBT 治疗的青少年对治疗的反应,预测分析也强调了无论治疗方式如何,在 CBT 中直接解决家庭适应问题对儿科 OCD 的重要性。讨论了当前研究结果的局限性和未来工作的方向。

相似文献

1
Moderators and predictors of outcomes in telephone delivered compared to face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: preliminary evidence from a non-inferiority RCT.电话干预与面对面认知行为疗法治疗儿童强迫症的结局的调节因素和预测因素:一项非劣效 RCT 的初步证据。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Sep;48(5):353-368. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1513555. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
2
Telephone cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.针对青少年强迫症患者的电话认知行为疗法:一项随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1298-1307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
Study protocol for a single-blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.一项针对强迫症的基于互联网与面对面认知行为疗法的单盲、随机对照、非劣效性试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e022254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022254.
4
Effect of an Internet-Delivered Stepped-Care Program vs In-Person Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.互联网递增效度治疗方案与面对面认知行为疗法治疗儿童和青少年强迫症症状的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 May 11;325(18):1863-1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3839.
5
Therapist-Assisted Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Progressive Relaxation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.治疗师辅助的基于互联网的认知行为疗法与渐进性放松疗法治疗强迫症:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 8;20(8):e242. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9566.
6
Efficacy of Augmentation of Cognitive Behavior Therapy With Weight-Adjusted d-Cycloserine vs Placebo in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.认知行为疗法联合体重调整的 d-环丝氨酸与安慰剂治疗儿童强迫症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 1;73(8):779-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1128.
7
Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of low-intensity interventions in the management of obsessive-compulsive disorder: the Obsessive-Compulsive Treatment Efficacy randomised controlled Trial (OCTET).低强度干预措施治疗强迫症的临床疗效、成本效益及可接受性:强迫症治疗疗效随机对照试验(OCTET)
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(37):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta21370.
8
Low-intensity cognitive-behaviour therapy interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to waiting list for therapist-led cognitive-behaviour therapy: 3-arm randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness.与等待接受治疗师主导的认知行为疗法相比,低强度认知行为疗法对强迫症的干预:一项关于临床疗效的三臂随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002337. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of telephone cognitive-behaviour therapy for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder.针对患有强迫症的青少年的电话认知行为疗法的成本效益分析。
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e7. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.73.
10
Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in the Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Treatment Study (POTS I).儿科强迫症治疗研究(POTS I)中的治疗结果预测因子和调节因素。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):1024-33; quiz 1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.虚拟护理在初级保健中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 14;27:e55007. doi: 10.2196/55007.
2
Opportunities and challenges in leveraging digital technology for mental health system strengthening: a systematic review to inform interventions in the United Arab Emirates.利用数字技术加强精神卫生系统的机遇与挑战:一项系统评价,为阿拉伯联合酋长国的干预措施提供信息。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2592. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19980-y.
3
Evidence of Phone vs Video-Conferencing for Mental Health Treatments: A Review of the Literature.
电话与视频会议治疗心理健康的证据:文献综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01359-8. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Conceptualizing and managing risk in pediatric OCD: Case examples.儿童强迫症的风险概念化与管理:案例示例
Bull Menninger Clin. 2020 Winter;84(1):3-20. doi: 10.1521/bumc_2019_83_06. Epub 2019 Aug 5.