Silverman Thomas B, Schrimshaw Eric W, Franks Julie, Hirsch-Moverman Yael, Ortega Hugo, El-Sadr Wafaa M, Colson Paul W
1 Harlem Prevention Center, ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
2 Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2018 Jan-Dec;17:2325958218798373. doi: 10.1177/2325958218798373.
In 2016 to 2017, we surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) in upper Manhattan and the South Bronx, New York, on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV. Despite efforts to promote survey response, we were only able to obtain a meager response rate, limiting our ability to interpret results. In this short communication, we examine our survey's methodology, as well as the methods used by other similar studies, in order to suggest how certain strategies appear to influence PCP response to PrEP surveys. Administering the survey in a variety of modes, sampling from a professional organization's listserv, promoting the survey topic's relevance to potential participants, and offering monetary incentives to each survey respondent all appear to be promising strategies for increasing response rates in PrEP provider surveys.
2016年至2017年,我们对纽约曼哈顿上城和南布朗克斯区的初级保健提供者(PCP)进行了调查,了解他们对艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的知识、态度和做法。尽管努力提高调查回复率,但我们仅获得了很低的回复率,限制了我们解读结果的能力。在这篇简短的交流文章中,我们审视了我们调查的方法,以及其他类似研究采用的方法,以便提出某些策略似乎如何影响初级保健提供者对PrEP调查的回复。以多种方式进行调查、从专业组织的邮件列表中抽样、宣传调查主题与潜在参与者的相关性,以及向每位调查受访者提供金钱激励,这些似乎都是提高PrEP提供者调查回复率的有前景的策略。