Arora Kavita Shah, Morris Jane, Jacobs Allan J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Fall;29(3):206-216.
While all states in the United States require certain vaccinations for school attendance, all but three allow for religious exemptions to receiving such vaccinations, and 18 allow for exemptions on the basis of other deeply held personal beliefs. The rights of parents to raise children as they see fit may conflict with the duty of the government and society to protect the welfare of children. In the U.S., these conflicts have not been settled in a uniform and consistent manner. We apply a test that provides a concrete and formal rubric to evaluate such conflicts. For some vaccinations, based on the individual medical characteristics of the disease and the risks of being unvaccinated, the test would suggest that permitting conscientious exemptions is ethical. However, for vaccinations protecting against other diseases that are more severe or easily transmitted, the test would suggest that the federal government may ethically impose laws that deny such exemptions.
虽然美国所有州都要求学生入学时接种某些疫苗,但除了三个州外,其他州都允许因宗教原因而不接种此类疫苗,还有18个州允许基于其他根深蒂固的个人信仰而豁免接种。父母按照自己认为合适的方式抚养孩子的权利,可能与政府和社会保护儿童福利的责任相冲突。在美国,这些冲突尚未以统一和一致的方式得到解决。我们应用一种测试方法,该方法提供了一个具体而正式的准则来评估此类冲突。对于某些疫苗,根据疾病的个体医学特征和未接种疫苗的风险,该测试方法会表明允许出于良心拒种是符合道德的。然而,对于预防其他更严重或更易传播疾病的疫苗,该测试方法会表明联邦政府在道德上可能会实施拒绝此类豁免的法律。