Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年心理健康中共享决策的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的临床医生观点。

Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

机构信息

Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud Centre, 21 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5SD, UK.

Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, 21 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5SD, UK.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 May;28(5):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1230-0. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is increasingly being suggested as an integral part of mental health provision. Yet, there is little research on what clinicians believe the barriers and facilitators around practice to be. At the same time, there is also increasing recognition of a theory-practice gap within the field, with calls for more pragmatic uses of theory to inform and improve clinical practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, clinician perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM are investigated. The sample comprised of 15 clinicians across two sites in England, who took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 21 barriers and facilitators for SDM in child and youth mental health were identified across ten domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, emotions, and professional role and identity. Findings suggest that a range of barriers and facilitators affect clinicians' abilities to engage in SDM with young people and parents. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate young people and their families in care and treatment decisions.

摘要

共享决策(SDM)越来越被认为是精神卫生服务的一个组成部分。然而,关于临床医生认为实践中的障碍和促进因素是什么的研究甚少。与此同时,该领域也越来越认识到理论与实践之间存在差距,呼吁更实际地使用理论来为临床实践提供信息和改进。本研究使用理论领域框架(TDF),这是一个全面的、以理论为基础的框架,由 33 种行为改变理论和 128 个结构组成,调查了临床医生对 SDM 的感知障碍和促进因素。样本包括英格兰两个地点的 15 名临床医生,他们参加了定性半结构式访谈和焦点小组。使用演绎主题分析对转录本进行分析,并根据每个理论领域对主题进行编码。总体而言,在儿童和青少年心理健康领域确定了 TDF 的十个领域中的 21 个 SDM 障碍和促进因素。在能力方面,发现了知识、技能、记忆/注意力/决策过程和行为调节方面的障碍和促进因素。在机会方面,发现了社会影响以及环境背景和资源方面的障碍和促进因素。最后,在动机方面,涵盖了以下领域:对后果的信念、对能力的信念、情绪以及专业角色和身份。研究结果表明,一系列障碍和促进因素影响了临床医生与年轻人及其父母进行 SDM 的能力。应该开发针对能力、机会和动机相关领域的干预措施,以更好地促进年轻人及其家庭在护理和治疗决策中的参与。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

7
An emerging field of research: challenges in pediatric decision making.一个新兴的研究领域:儿科决策中的挑战。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):403-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14546901. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Twelve myths about shared decision making.关于共同决策的十二个误区。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验