• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从社会网站看与儿科辐射安全相关的在线信息的可读性。

Readability of Online Information Related to Pediatric Radiation Safety From Societal Websites.

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

2 Department of Family Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):1128-1134. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19299. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.17.19299
PMID:30240293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Internet has become a major readily available source of health care education. Pediatric radiation safety is a complex topic with evolving safety guidelines. The purpose of this study is to assess the readability of publically available online information pertaining to pediatric radiation safety available on the websites of radiologic and pediatric societies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Online information related to pediatric radiation safety that is available on the Society for Pediatric Radiology website and the websites RadiologyInfo (sponsored by the Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Radiology) and HealthyChildren.org (sponsored by the American Academy of Pediatrics) was evaluated for readability. Each article was assessed using six readability tests, which use either a grade level or a numeric scale to categorize readability. ANOVA was used to compare readability levels and intraclass correlation coefficients for analytic reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 54 articles were included in the analysis. Three of the articles were written below the eighth-grade reading level. The mean readability ranged from grades 12.1 to 14.8 among the five different grade level-based readability scales used. The mean readability determined using the numeric scale was 37.3 (which identified readability as difficult), with 91% of articles categorized as very difficult, difficult, or fairly difficult and with no article categorized as easy or very easy. No difference in readability was found among the different web sources (p = 0.46-0.85).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the readability of information pertaining to pediatric radiation safety that is available on radiology and pediatric medical society websites is at a level that is too difficult for the average adult.

摘要

目的

互联网已成为获取医疗保健教育的主要来源。儿科辐射安全是一个具有不断发展的安全指南的复杂主题。本研究的目的是评估放射学和儿科协会网站上提供的与儿科辐射安全相关的公共在线信息的可读性。

材料和方法

评估了可在儿科放射学会网站以及 RadiologyInfo(由北美放射学会和美国放射学会赞助)和 HealthyChildren.org(由美国儿科学会赞助)网站上获得的与儿科辐射安全相关的在线信息的可读性。使用了六种可读性测试来评估每篇文章,这些测试使用年级或数字量表来对可读性进行分类。使用方差分析来比较可读性水平和组内相关系数以进行分析可靠性。

结果

共有 54 篇文章纳入分析。三篇文章的阅读水平低于八年级。在使用的五种不同的基于年级的可读性量表中,平均可读性范围从 12.1 到 14.8 级。使用数字量表确定的平均可读性为 37.3(表示可读性困难),91%的文章被归类为非常困难、困难或相当困难,没有文章被归类为容易或非常容易。不同的网络来源之间的可读性没有差异(p = 0.46-0.85)。

结论

总体而言,放射学和儿科医学协会网站上提供的有关儿科辐射安全的信息的可读性对于普通成年人来说太难了。

相似文献

1
Readability of Online Information Related to Pediatric Radiation Safety From Societal Websites.从社会网站看与儿科辐射安全相关的在线信息的可读性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):1128-1134. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19299. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Readability of Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org: Has There Been Progress Over the Past 5 Years?从 RadiologyInfo.org 看患者教育材料的易读性:过去 5 年是否有所进步?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):875-879. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.21047. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety.我们是否沟通不畅?基于互联网的患者教育材料与辐射安全。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Sep;83(9):1698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
4
Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上有关关节镜相关患者教育资料的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.
5
Readability of Spanish-Language Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org.放射学信息网西班牙语患者教育材料的易读性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Aug;16(8):1108-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics.儿科骨科患者教育材料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 16;103(12):e47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01347.
7
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
8
Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美小儿骨科学会网站上患者教育资料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347.
9
Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Leading Orthopedic Academic Centers.来自领先骨科学术中心的脊柱相关患者教育材料的可读性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(9):E561-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001321.
10
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Readability of Patient Education Materials for Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, Distraction-Based Methods, and Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Pediatric Spinal Deformity.评估用于治疗小儿脊柱畸形的前路椎体束缚术、基于牵引的方法及后路脊柱融合术的患者教育材料的可读性。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):178-185. doi: 10.14444/8591.
2
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.评估使用 ChatGPT 准确简化有关乳腺癌预防和筛查的以患者为中心的信息。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230086. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230086.
3
Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study.
加拿大主要儿科协会基于网络的患者教育材料可读性评估:横断面研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 16;5(1):e31820. doi: 10.2196/31820.
4
Readability of patient education materials related to radiation safety: What are the implications for patient-centred radiology care?与辐射安全相关的患者教育材料的可读性:对以患者为中心的放射学护理有何影响?
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01094-3.