• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理环境对配偶健康结果的影响。

Effects of long-term care setting on spousal health outcomes.

机构信息

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

IMPAQ International, Columbia, Maryland.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54(1):158-166. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13053. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13053
PMID:30246337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6338294/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide empirical evidence on the effects of home and community-based services (HCBS) (vs nursing home) use on spousal health.

DATA SOURCES

Merged data from the 1996 to 2012 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Area Health Resource File (AHRF).

STUDY DESIGN

We assess the impact of HCBS use on spousal health. We use an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for the potential endogeneity of the choice of care setting and reverse causality. Our instrument is the supply of skilled nursing home beds per 1000 people older than 65 years.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Our sample includes spouses of HCBS or nursing home users, resulting in 8608 observations.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We find that HCBS use leads to harmful effects on spousal physical health, which may be caused by increased informal care responsibilities. We also find improved spousal mental health, especially in depression symptoms, which may be caused by increased satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We find evidence of both beneficial (mental health) and harmful (physical health) consequences for spouses of individuals receiving LTC at home relative to in an institution. Our results are important in estimating the potential cost and effectiveness of HCBS expansion.

摘要

目的

为家庭和社区为基础的服务(HCBS)(与养老院相比)使用对配偶健康的影响提供经验证据。

资料来源

合并了来自 1996 年至 2012 年健康与退休研究(HRS)和地区卫生资源档案(AHRF)的数据。

研究设计

我们评估了 HCBS 使用对配偶健康的影响。我们使用工具变量(IV)方法来解释护理地点选择的潜在内生性和反向因果关系。我们的工具是每 1000 名 65 岁以上的人中熟练的养老院床位供应。

资料提取方法

我们的样本包括 HCBS 或养老院使用者的配偶,共 8608 例观察结果。

主要发现

我们发现 HCBS 使用对配偶的身体健康产生了有害影响,这可能是由于非正式照顾责任的增加所致。我们还发现配偶的心理健康得到了改善,尤其是在抑郁症状方面,这可能是由于满意度的提高所致。

结论

我们发现,与在机构中接受长期护理的个人相比,在家中接受长期护理的个人的配偶既有有益的(心理健康),也有有害的(身体健康)后果。我们的结果对于估计 HCBS 扩张的潜在成本和效果非常重要。

相似文献

1
Effects of long-term care setting on spousal health outcomes.长期护理环境对配偶健康结果的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54(1):158-166. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13053. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
2
Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.
3
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Associations Between Secondary Caregivers' Supportive Behavior and Psychological Distress of Primary Spousal Caregivers of Cognitively Intact and Impaired Elders.认知功能正常和受损老年人的主要配偶照料者的心理困扰与次要照料者支持行为之间的关联
Gerontologist. 2015 Aug;55(4):584-94. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt156. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
5
Caregiving at the end of life: perspectives from spousal caregivers and care recipients.临终关怀:配偶照料者与受照料者的观点
Palliat Support Care. 2007 Mar;5(1):11-7. doi: 10.1017/s1478951507070034.
6
Medicaid home and community-based services spending for older adults: Is there a "woodwork" effect?医疗补助计划用于老年人居家和社区服务的支出:是否存在“潜在需求涌现”效应?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3143-3151. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18478. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
The role of Medicaid home- and community-based services in use of Medicare post-acute care.医疗补助计划的居家和社区服务在使用医疗保险急性后期护理中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14325. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14325. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
The influence of community-based services on the burden of spouses caring for their partners with dementia.社区服务对痴呆症患者配偶照料负担的影响。
Health Soc Work. 2009 Feb;34(1):29-39. doi: 10.1093/hsw/34.1.29.
9
Development of a home-visit nursing scale for helping spousal caregivers of terminal cancer patients develop positive perspectives of their caregiving experiences: a cross-sectional study.开发一种居家探访护理量表,帮助晚期癌症患者的配偶照顾者积极看待其照顾体验:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e031057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031057.
10
The positive impact of informal spousal caregiving on the physical activity of older adults.非正式配偶护理对老年人身体活动的积极影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;10:977846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.977846. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Mood states and well-being of spouses of fibromyalgia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纤维肌痛患者配偶的情绪状态与幸福感:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1411709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411709. eCollection 2024.
2
Barriers to Service Use Among Dementia Family Caregivers in Rural Appalachia: Implications for Reducing Caregiver Overload.农村阿巴拉契亚地区痴呆症家庭照顾者的服务使用障碍:减轻照顾者负担的意义。
Prev Sci. 2023 Jul;24(5):950-960. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01479-w. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
3
A participatory arts programme - Shared experience for family caregivers and care recipients.参与式艺术计划——为家庭照顾者和被照顾者提供共同的体验。
Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):3011-3017. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1547. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Association Between New-Onset Medicaid Home Care and Family Caregivers' Health.新获得医疗补助家庭护理与家庭照料者健康之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Sep 17;2(9):e212671. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2671. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Caring Together: Trajectories of Paid and Family Caregiving Support to Those Living in the Community With Dementia.共同照护:为社区中患有痴呆症的人群提供有偿和家庭照护支持的轨迹。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 20;77(Suppl_1):S11-S20. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac006.
6
Experiences of Older Spousal Caregivers for Caring a Person with a Memory Disorder.老年配偶照顾者照顾记忆障碍患者的经历。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 13;8(2):95. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020095.
7
Spousal Caregivers Are Caregiving Alone In The Last Years Of Life.配偶照顾者在生命的最后几年独自照顾。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):964-972. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00087.

本文引用的文献

1
Informal care and caregiver's health.非正式护理与照料者的健康。
Health Econ. 2015 Feb;24(2):224-37. doi: 10.1002/hec.3012. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
2
Instrumental variable methods for causal inference.工具变量法在因果推断中的应用。
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2297-340. doi: 10.1002/sim.6128. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
3
Factors determining the impact of care-giving on caregivers of elderly patients with dementia. A systematic literature review.影响老年痴呆症患者照护者的因素。系统文献回顾。
Maturitas. 2010 Jun;66(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
4
Caring for mom and neglecting yourself? The health effects of caring for an elderly parent.照顾母亲却忽视了自己?照顾年迈父母对健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2009 Sep;18(9):991-1010. doi: 10.1002/hec.1512.
5
Problems and benefits reported by stroke family caregivers: results from a prospective epidemiological study.中风患者家庭照顾者报告的问题与益处:一项前瞻性流行病学研究的结果
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2129-33. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.545269. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
6
Is caring associated with an increased risk of mortality? A longitudinal study.关怀照料与死亡率增加有关联吗?一项纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(8):1282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.025. Epub 2008 Jul 28.
7
Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.两阶段残差包含估计:解决健康计量经济学建模中的内生性问题
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
Cancer caregivers' quality of life: effects of gender, relationship, and appraisal.癌症护理者的生活质量:性别、关系及评估的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Sep;34(3):294-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
9
Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis.非正式照料者身体健康的相关因素:一项荟萃分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):P126-37. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.p126.
10
The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: review and synthesis of the most recent evidence.非机构化长期护理服务的成本效益:最新证据综述与综合分析
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Feb;63(1):3-28. doi: 10.1177/1077558705283120.