• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阵列结构和二级认知任务需求对视觉搜索过程的影响。

The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search.

作者信息

Savage Steven William, Potter Douglas D, Tatler Benjamin W

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, 02114 Boston, MA, USA.

University of Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2018 Dec;153:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004
PMID:30248367
Abstract

Many aspects of our everyday behaviour require that we search for objects. However, in real situations search is often conducted while internal and external factors compete for our attention resources. Cognitive distraction interferes with our ability to search for targets, increasing search times. Here we consider whether effects of cognitive distraction interfere differentially with three distinct phases of search: initiating search, overtly scanning through items in the display, and verifying that the object is indeed the target of search once it has been fixated. Furthermore, we consider whether strategic components of visual search that emerge when searching items organized into structured arrays are susceptible to cognitive distraction or not. We used Gilchrist & Harvey's (2006) structured and unstructured visual search paradigm with the addition of Savage, Potter, and Tatler's (2013) secondary puzzle task. Cognitive load influenced two phases of search: 1) scanning times and 2) verification times. Under high load, fixation durations were longer and re-fixations of distracters were more common. In terms of scanning strategy, we replicated Gilchrist and Harvey's (2006) findings of more systematic search for structured arrays than unstructured ones. We also found an effect of cognitive load on this aspect of search but only in structured arrays. Our findings suggest that our eyes, by default, produce an autonomous scanning pattern that is modulated but not completely eliminated by secondary cognitive load.

摘要

我们日常行为的许多方面都需要我们寻找物体。然而,在实际情况中,搜索往往是在内部和外部因素争夺我们的注意力资源时进行的。认知干扰会妨碍我们寻找目标的能力,从而增加搜索时间。在这里,我们考虑认知干扰的影响是否会对搜索的三个不同阶段产生不同的干扰:启动搜索、公开扫描显示中的项目,以及在物体被注视后确认它确实是搜索目标。此外,我们考虑当搜索组织成结构化阵列的项目时出现的视觉搜索的策略成分是否容易受到认知干扰。我们使用了吉尔克里斯特和哈维(2006年)的结构化和非结构化视觉搜索范式,并增加了萨维奇、波特和塔特勒(2013年)的二次拼图任务。认知负荷影响了搜索的两个阶段:1)扫描时间和2)验证时间。在高负荷下,注视持续时间更长,对干扰物的重新注视更常见。在扫描策略方面,我们重复了吉尔克里斯特和哈维(2006年)的发现,即对结构化阵列的搜索比对非结构化阵列的搜索更系统。我们还发现认知负荷对搜索的这一方面有影响,但仅在结构化阵列中。我们的研究结果表明,默认情况下,我们的眼睛会产生一种自主扫描模式,这种模式会受到二次认知负荷的调节,但不会被完全消除。

相似文献

1
The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search.阵列结构和二级认知任务需求对视觉搜索过程的影响。
Vision Res. 2018 Dec;153:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
2
Scanning behaviour in natural scenes is influenced by a preceding unrelated visual search task.自然场景中的扫视行为会受到先前无关视觉搜索任务的影响。
Perception. 2011;40(11):1335-49. doi: 10.1068/p6848.
3
Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.物体局部流畅度梯度的影响会产生搜索不对称性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):71-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1576-x.
4
One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search.一次视觉搜索,多次记忆搜索:混合搜索的眼动追踪研究
J Vis. 2017 Sep 1;17(11):5. doi: 10.1167/17.11.5.
5
Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: memory use during search depends on the orienting effector.平衡精力和认知资源:搜索过程中的记忆使用取决于定向效应器。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):443-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
Visual processing and social cognition in schizophrenia: relationships among eye movements, biological motion perception, and empathy.精神分裂症中的视觉处理与社会认知:眼动、生物运动感知与共情之间的关系。
Neurosci Res. 2015 Jan;90:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.视觉搜索中的内隐物体命名:来自语音竞争的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2633-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6.
8
Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features.使用眼动特征对视觉和语言任务进行分类。
J Vis. 2014 Mar 7;14(3):11. doi: 10.1167/14.3.11.
9
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.阅读、场景感知和视觉搜索中的眼动与注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
10
Visual search in patients with subcortical vascular dementia: short fixations but long reaction times.皮质下血管性痴呆患者的视觉搜索:注视时间短但反应时间长。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;20(6):375-80. doi: 10.1159/000089104. Epub 2005 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardised colour-coded compartmentalised syringe trays improve anaesthetic medication visual search and mitigate cognitive load.标准化彩色分区注射器托盘可改善麻醉药物视觉搜索并减轻认知负担。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Mar;130(3):343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.012. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Facebook/Meta usage in higher education: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis.高等教育中Facebook/Meta的使用:基于深度学习的双阶段结构方程模型-人工神经网络分析
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):9821-9855. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11012-9. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
3
Application of Eye Tracking in Puzzle Games for Adjunct Cognitive Markers: Pilot Observational Study in Older Adults.
眼动追踪在益智游戏中作为辅助认知标志物的应用:针对老年人的初步观察性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Mar 22;9(1):e24151. doi: 10.2196/24151.