Department of Dietetics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Social Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):335-340. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky207.
Dietary pattern (DP) analysis is a statistical method used to evaluate the comprehensive effect of the diet on health. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between DPs derived in selected population of Lower Silesia and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components.
Study group consisted of 1634 individuals enrolled in the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological Study Poland. Dietary intake was estimated using the data from the Food Frequency Questionnaire. DPs were identified using principal component analysis. MS prevalence was evaluated based on the criteria accepted by International Diabetes Federation, American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in 2009.
Three DPs were identified. The percentage of individuals with MS was lower in the upper quartile (Q) of the 'fruit & vegetables' DP in comparison with Q1 (40.4 vs. 48.9%). Inverse relationship was observed for 'Western' (Q4 vs. Q1: 50.7 vs. 40.8%) and 'traditional' DPs (51.0 vs. 38.3%). After adjusting for potential confounders, in Q4 of 'traditional' DP higher risk for central obesity was observed compared to Q1 (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.10-2.12). Individuals in Q3 of 'fruit & vegetables' DP had lower risk for raised blood pressure in comparison with the bottom Q (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.36-0.82).
DP analysis allows to evaluate the synergistic effect of the diet on the MS prevalence. 'Fruit & vegetables' DP, in contrast to 'Western' and 'traditional' DPs, was negatively associated with the prevalence of MS and its components in the study group.
饮食模式(DP)分析是一种用于评估饮食对健康综合影响的统计方法。本研究的目的是评估下西里西亚特定人群中得出的 DP 与代谢综合征(MS)及其成分的患病率之间的关系。
研究组由参加波兰前瞻性城乡流行病学研究的 1634 名个体组成。膳食摄入量使用来自食物频率问卷的数据进行评估。使用主成分分析确定 DP。根据国际糖尿病联合会、美国心脏协会和美国国立心肺血液研究所 2009 年接受的标准评估 MS 的患病率。
确定了三种 DP。与 Q1 相比,“水果和蔬菜” DP 较高四分位数(Q)的 MS 患者比例较低(40.4%比 48.9%)。“西方”(Q4 比 Q1:50.7%比 40.8%)和“传统”DP(51.0%比 38.3%)观察到相反的关系。在调整潜在混杂因素后,与 Q1 相比,“传统”DP 的 Q4 中中心性肥胖的风险更高(OR 1.52;95%CI:1.10-2.12)。与最低 Q 相比,“水果和蔬菜” DP 的 Q3 个体的血压升高风险较低(OR 0.54;95%CI:0.36-0.82)。
DP 分析允许评估饮食对 MS 患病率的协同作用。与“西方”和“传统” DP 相反,“水果和蔬菜” DP 与研究组中 MS 及其成分的患病率呈负相关。