Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Law School, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Oct;14(10):1334-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Consent is generally required for research and sharing rich individual-level data but presents additional ethical and legal challenges where participants have diminished decision-making capacity. We formed a multi-disciplinary team to develop best practices for consent in data-intensive dementia research. We recommend that consent processes for research and data sharing support decision-making by persons with dementia, protect them from exploitation, and promote the common good. Broad consent designed to endure beyond a loss of capacity and combined with ongoing oversight can best achieve these goals. Persons with dementia should be supported to make decisions and enabled to express their will and preferences about participation in advance of a loss of capacity. Regulatory frameworks should clarify who can act as a representative for research decisions. By promoting harmonization of consent practices across institutions, sectors, and countries, we hope to facilitate data sharing to accelerate progress in dementia research, care, and prevention.
同意通常是研究和分享丰富的个体数据所必需的,但在参与者决策能力下降的情况下,会带来额外的伦理和法律挑战。我们组建了一个多学科团队,制定数据密集型痴呆症研究中的同意最佳实践。我们建议,研究和数据共享的同意过程应支持痴呆症患者的决策,保护他们免受剥削,并促进共同利益。旨在在丧失能力后仍然有效的广泛同意,并结合持续监督,可以最好地实现这些目标。应支持痴呆症患者做出决策,并使他们能够在丧失能力之前表达他们对参与研究的意愿和偏好。监管框架应明确谁可以代表研究决策行事。通过促进机构、部门和国家之间同意实践的协调一致,我们希望促进数据共享,以加速痴呆症研究、护理和预防的进展。