• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者同伴支持会议:对讨论内容的定性描述性分析

Peer support meeting of people with dementia: a qualitative descriptive analysis of the discussions.

作者信息

Miyamae Fumiko, Sugiyama Mika, Taga Tsutomu, Okamura Tsuyoshi

机构信息

Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-Cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04329-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04329-8
PMID:37814249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563253/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia cafés for people with dementia and their caregivers are promoted in national dementia policies. The effect of dementia cafés on people with dementia has been reported through narratives of caregivers who participated the dementia cafés. However, evidence derived from the data, which included only people with dementia, is sparse. The aim of this study is to analyze the narratives of people with dementia in peer support meetings in Tokyo where only people with dementia participate, i.e., caregivers were not present.

METHODS

People with dementia and older people with subjective cognitive impairment were recruited in our community-based participatory research centre. Based on the qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted a thematic analysis of the field notes, which was made through ethnographical observation of the meetings.

RESULTS

Twenty-five meetings were held from November 2018 to March 2020. The cumulative total number of participants was 196. First, the symptomatic problems related to living with dementia were mentioned, which were collectively named under the overarching category of 'Experience of living with dementia.' Second, questions and solutions to the various symptoms were discussed, which were named the 'Quest of Symptoms.' Third, we noted the narrative that reflected on daily life, feelings, and the life that one has led, which were named 'Life story.' Fourth, we noted narratives of how symptoms have improved and their world has expanded, which were named 'Hope.' Fifth and most importantly, narratives about compassion for people with dementia in the past and future, as well as for people of the same generation, were discussed, which were named 'Compassion.'

CONCLUSIONS

The lived experiences of people with dementia were revealed. Participants noted they were not just being cared for but exchanging information and exploring the symptoms; in other words, they were resilient. Furthermore, more positive aspects concerning living with dementia were discussed, such as 'Hope' and 'Compassion.' Further research concerning the discourse of people around the participants is necessary to evaluate the situation from multiple perspectives.

摘要

背景

国家痴呆症政策提倡为痴呆症患者及其护理人员设立痴呆症咖啡馆。通过参与痴呆症咖啡馆的护理人员的叙述,已报道了痴呆症咖啡馆对痴呆症患者的影响。然而,仅来自痴呆症患者数据的证据却很少。本研究的目的是分析在东京仅痴呆症患者(即护理人员不在场)参加的同伴支持会议中痴呆症患者的叙述。

方法

在我们基于社区的参与性研究中心招募了痴呆症患者和有主观认知障碍的老年人。基于定性描述方法,我们对通过会议的人种志观察所做的现场记录进行了主题分析。

结果

2018年11月至2020年3月共举行了25次会议。累计参与者总数为196人。首先,提到了与痴呆症生活相关的症状问题,这些问题在“痴呆症生活经历”这一总体类别下进行了统称。其次,讨论了各种症状的问题及解决方案,这些被命名为“症状探索”。第三,我们注意到了反映日常生活、感受和个人经历的叙述,这些被命名为“生活故事”。第四,我们注意到了关于症状如何改善以及他们的世界如何扩展的叙述,这些被命名为“希望”。第五,也是最重要的,讨论了关于对过去和未来的痴呆症患者以及同代人的同情的叙述,这些被命名为“同情”。

结论

揭示了痴呆症患者的生活经历。参与者指出他们不仅仅是在接受照顾,还在交流信息和探索症状;换句话说,他们很有适应能力。此外,还讨论了与痴呆症生活相关的更积极的方面,如“希望”和“同情”。有必要进一步研究参与者周围人的话语,以便从多个角度评估情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/c6eb932e592b/12877_2023_4329_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/2a302d667b62/12877_2023_4329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/7ded96012cb1/12877_2023_4329_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/1530f11f7b92/12877_2023_4329_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/ba01336fcaae/12877_2023_4329_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/97dde04ea505/12877_2023_4329_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/0fc8748d5a8c/12877_2023_4329_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/c6eb932e592b/12877_2023_4329_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/2a302d667b62/12877_2023_4329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/7ded96012cb1/12877_2023_4329_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/1530f11f7b92/12877_2023_4329_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/ba01336fcaae/12877_2023_4329_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/97dde04ea505/12877_2023_4329_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/0fc8748d5a8c/12877_2023_4329_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc5/10563253/c6eb932e592b/12877_2023_4329_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Peer support meeting of people with dementia: a qualitative descriptive analysis of the discussions.痴呆症患者同伴支持会议:对讨论内容的定性描述性分析
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04329-8.
2
A qualitative study of carers' experiences of dementia cafés: a place to feel supported and be yourself.一项关于痴呆症咖啡馆照顾者体验的定性研究:一个能让人感到被支持并做自己的地方。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0559-4.
3
The meaningfulness of participating in support groups for informal caregivers of older adults with dementia: a systematic review.参与老年痴呆症患者非正式照料者支持小组的意义:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jul 17;13(6):373-433. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2121.
4
Planning and designing a self-compassion intervention for family carers of people living with dementia: a person-based and co-design approach.为痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者规划和设计自我同情干预措施:基于个体的共同设计方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02754-9.
5
'Talking about my experiences … at times disturbing yet positive': Producing narratives with people living with dementia.“谈论我的经历……有时令人不安,但也有积极的一面”:与痴呆症患者一起创作叙述。
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1034-52. doi: 10.1177/1471301214551845. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Dementia Cafés as a Community Resource for Persons With Early-Stage Cognitive Disorders: A Nationwide Survey in Japan.痴呆症咖啡馆作为有早期认知障碍人群的社区资源:日本全国范围内的调查。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Dec;20(12):1515-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Interventions to build resilience in family caregivers of people living with dementia: a comprehensive systematic review.增强痴呆症患者家庭照料者复原力的干预措施:一项全面的系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jun;14(6):238-73. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002555.
8
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
9
Needs of persons with dementia and their family caregivers in dementia cafés.痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者在痴呆症咖啡馆的需求。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Dec;31(12):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01129-2. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews.慢性病患者的同伴支持:系统评价综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07816-7.
2
Effects of reminiscence therapy in people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.怀旧疗法对痴呆症患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Dec;29(6):883-903. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12830. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
3
Empowerment in cancer patients: Does peer support make a difference? A systematic review.
癌症患者的赋权:同伴支持有作用吗?一项系统综述。
Psychooncology. 2022 May;31(5):683-704. doi: 10.1002/pon.5869. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
4
After 5 years, half of people with cognitive impairment were no longer living in the community: A community observational survey.5年后,一半的认知障碍患者不再居住在社区:一项社区观察性调查。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;36(12):1970-1971. doi: 10.1002/gps.5608. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Living on the edge of the community: factors associated with discontinuation of community living among people with cognitive impairment.生活在社区边缘:认知障碍人群中断社区生活的相关因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02084-2.
6
Differences in Compassion, Well-being, and Social Anxiety between Japan and the USA.日本与美国在同情心、幸福感和社交焦虑方面的差异。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2019 May;10(5):854-862. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-1045-6. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Consent recommendations for research and international data sharing involving persons with dementia.涉及痴呆症患者的研究和国际数据共享的同意书建议。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Oct;14(10):1334-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
8
What Factors Predict Family Caregivers' Attendance at Dementia Cafés?哪些因素可以预测家庭照顾者参加痴呆症咖啡馆?
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(4):1337-1345. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180377.
9
Evaluation of the implementation of the Meeting Centres Support Program in Italy, Poland, and the UK; exploration of the effects on people with dementia.意大利、波兰和英国会议中心支持计划实施情况评估;探索对痴呆症患者的影响。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;33(7):883-892. doi: 10.1002/gps.4865. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Alzheimer Café: an approach focused on Alzheimer's patients but with remarkable values on the quality of life of their caregivers.阿尔茨海默病咖啡馆:一种关注阿尔茨海默病患者的方法,但对其照顾者的生活质量具有显著价值。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;30(7):767-774. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0844-2. Epub 2017 Oct 11.