• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异常海马亚区可能是药物初治的重度抑郁症患者早期抗抑郁治疗反应较差的潜在预测指标。

Abnormal Hippocampal Subfields May Be Potential Predictors of Worse Early Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Drug-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

机构信息

Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(6):1760-1768. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26520. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.26520
PMID:30295348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies had proved that hippocampal volume has predictive value for antidepressant response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the exact subregion of the hippocampus relevant to the predictive role of antidepressants response is not known.

PURPOSE

To explore which hippocampal subfield volumes might predict an early response to first-time use of antidepressants in drug-naïve MDD patients.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Thirty-eight drug-naïve MDD patients (mean illness duration = 1.6 years) and 55 healthy control subjects (HCS).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T MRI, T -weighted, 3D, SPGR sequence.

ASSESSMENT

The hippocampal subfields and total intracranial volume were measured with FreeSurfer. The response to antidepressants was evaluated by the reduction rate of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (RRS) after a 6-week routine clinical antidepressant treatment.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The relationship between hippocampal subfield volumes and RRS was explored using partial correlation analysis. Volume differences among early responding patients (ERP), nonresponding patients (NRP), and HCS were examined by multivariate analysis of covariance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of volumes as predictors.

RESULTS

NRP had significantly larger volumes than both ERP and HCS in bilateral subiculum, cornu ammonis (CA) 1 and left CA2/3, CA4/dentate gyrus (DG) (all P < 0.01, false discovery rate corrected). Significant negative correlations were found between the RRS and volumes of left subiculum (P = 0.004), CA2/3 (P = 0.008), and CA4/DG (P = 0.004) in the whole MDD group. ROC analysis demonstrated that the left subiculum exhibited the highest accuracy for differentiating NRP from ERP, with a sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 80%.

DATA CONCLUSION

These findings propose that volumes of certain hippocampal subfields may be associated with antidepressant treatment and this has potential use in clinical applications for treatment selection in patients with MDD at an early stage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1760-1768.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经证明,海马体积对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的抗抑郁反应具有预测价值。然而,与抗抑郁反应的预测作用相关的确切海马亚区尚不清楚。

目的

探讨哪些海马亚区体积可能预测首次使用抗抑郁药治疗药物初治 MDD 患者的早期反应。

研究类型

前瞻性。

人群

38 名药物初治 MDD 患者(平均患病时间为 1.6 年)和 55 名健康对照组(HCS)。

磁场强度/序列:3.0T MRI,T1 加权,3D,SPGR 序列。

评估

使用 FreeSurfer 测量海马亚区和总颅内体积。通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分(HAMD)降低率(RRS)评估抗抑郁治疗 6 周后的抗抑郁反应。

统计学检验

采用偏相关分析探讨海马亚区体积与 RRS 的关系。采用多元协方差分析比较早期反应患者(ERP)、非反应患者(NRP)和 HCS 之间的海马亚区体积差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估体积作为预测因子的敏感性和特异性。

结果

NRP 的双侧海马伞、角回(CA)1 和左侧 CA2/3、CA4/齿状回(DG)的体积明显大于 ERP 和 HCS(均 P<0.01,假发现率校正)。在整个 MDD 组中,RRS 与左侧海马伞(P=0.004)、CA2/3(P=0.008)和 CA4/DG(P=0.004)的体积呈显著负相关。ROC 分析表明,左侧海马伞区分 NRP 和 ERP 的准确率最高,敏感性为 76.9%,特异性为 80%。

数据结论

这些发现表明,某些海马亚区的体积可能与抗抑郁治疗相关,这可能有助于在 MDD 早期阶段对患者进行治疗选择。

证据水平

2 技术功效:4 级 JMRI 2019;49:1760-1768。

相似文献

1
Abnormal Hippocampal Subfields May Be Potential Predictors of Worse Early Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Drug-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.异常海马亚区可能是药物初治的重度抑郁症患者早期抗抑郁治疗反应较差的潜在预测指标。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(6):1760-1768. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26520. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.海马亚区体积在重性抑郁障碍和双相障碍中的变化。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;57:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
3
Structural Changes in Hippocampal Subfields in Patients with Continuous Remission of Drug-Naive Major Depressive Disorder.药物初发的持续性缓解的重性抑郁障碍患者海马亚区的结构变化。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 25;21(9):3032. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093032.
4
Altered hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder with and without anhedonia.伴有和不伴有快感缺失的重性抑郁症患者海马亚区体积改变。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05001-6.
5
Dentate gyrus volume and memory performance in major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者齿状回体积与记忆表现。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.048. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Hippocampal Subfields in Acute and Remitted Depression-an Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.急性和缓解期抑郁症的海马亚区:一项超高场磁共振成像研究。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Aug 1;22(8):513-522. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz030.
7
Hippocampal subfield analysis in medication-naïve female patients with major depressive disorder.未经药物治疗的重度抑郁症女性患者的海马亚区分析
J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Hippocampal volume predicts antidepressant efficacy in depressed patients without incomplete hippocampal inversion.海马体体积可预测无海马体不完全反转的抑郁症患者的抗抑郁疗效。
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Apr 27;12:949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.04.009. eCollection 2016.
9
GluCEST Imaging and Structural Alterations of the Bilateral Hippocampus in First-Episode and Early-Onset Major Depression Disorder.首次发作和早发性重度抑郁症患者双侧海马的GluCEST成像及结构改变
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Nov;58(5):1431-1440. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28651. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Abnormal resting-state functional connectivity of hippocampal subfields in patients with major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者海马亚区静息态功能连接异常。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02490-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Antidepressant Treatment Response From Cortical Structure on MRI: A Mega-Analysis From the ENIGMA-MDD Working Group.基于MRI皮质结构预测抗抑郁治疗反应:ENIGMA-MDD工作组的一项荟萃分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jan;46(1):e70053. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70053.
2
Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.利用脑磁共振成像预测重度抑郁症的治疗结果:一项荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;30(3):825-837. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02710-6. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Structural covariance network of the hippocampus-amygdala complex in medication-naïve patients with first-episode major depressive disorder.
首发重度抑郁症未用药患者海马体-杏仁核复合体的结构协方差网络
Psychoradiology. 2022 Dec 15;2(4):190-198. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkac023. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
The association between gray matter volume in the hippocampal subfield and antidepressant efficacy mediated by abnormal dynamic functional connectivity.海马亚区灰质体积与异常动态功能连接介导的抗抑郁疗效之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):8940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56866-w.
5
Association of hippocampal subfield volumes with prevalence, course and incidence of depressive symptoms: The Maastricht Study.海马亚区体积与抑郁症状的患病率、病程和发生率的关联:马斯特里赫特研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;224(2):66-73. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.143.
6
Hippocampal subfield volumes in treatment resistant depression and serial ketamine treatment.难治性抑郁症中的海马亚区体积与连续氯胺酮治疗
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 9;14:1227879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227879. eCollection 2023.
7
Neuroimaging-Derived Biomarkers of the Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine.神经影像学衍生的氯胺酮抗抑郁作用生物标志物。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Apr;8(4):361-386. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
8
Hippocampal subfield alterations in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of anatomic MRI studies.精神分裂症和重度抑郁症中海马亚区改变:解剖 MRI 研究的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Feb 7;48(1):E34-E49. doi: 10.1503/jpn.220086. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
9
Psychosocial factors and hippocampal subfields: The Medea-7T study.心理社会因素与海马亚区:Medea-7T 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Apr 1;44(5):1964-1984. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26185. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
10
Hippocampal adaptation to high altitude: a neuroanatomic profile of hippocampal subfields in Tibetans and acclimatized Han Chinese residents.海马体对高原环境的适应性:藏族人和适应高原环境的汉族居民海马体亚区的神经解剖学特征
Front Neuroanat. 2022 Nov 17;16:999033. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.999033. eCollection 2022.