• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我只是想能够做出选择”:加拿大安大略省关于乳房 X 光筛查的公民审议结果。

'I just want to be able to make a choice': Results from citizen deliberations about mammography screening in Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1364-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.013
PMID:30297301
Abstract

Despite Canada's long history with mammography screening, little is known about citizens' perspectives about mammography and how best to support women to make informed choices about screening. To address this gap, a series of four citizen deliberation events were held in 2015-16 in Ontario, a Canadian province with an organized population-based breast screening program in place since 1990. Forty-nine individuals participated in four citizen panels, each comprising an information session highlighting the evidence about mammography, and large- and small-group deliberations about approaches to support informed decision making for screening. Following their engagement with the research evidence about mammography, participants expressed concern about their lack of full awareness of the risks and benefits and a strong desire for choice when it comes to screening. To support informed choice, mammography programs need to reflect the values of information sharing, trust and transparency, financial accountability, and allow for personal interactions and shared decision-making. Citizens are looking for balanced information about the risks and benefits of screening presented in an easy to understand, comprehensive, and transparent manner. Primary health care providers and organized screening programs are important sources of information about mammography and must be vigilant in their efforts to support informed decision-making in this area by ensuring that the information materials they are using are balanced and reflect current evidence.

摘要

尽管加拿大在乳房 X 光筛查方面有着悠久的历史,但对于公民对乳房 X 光筛查的看法以及如何最好地支持妇女做出明智的筛查选择,人们知之甚少。为了弥补这一空白,2015-2016 年在安大略省举行了一系列四次公民审议活动,该省自 1990 年以来就有一个有组织的基于人群的乳房筛查计划。49 人参加了四个公民小组,每个小组都包括一个信息会议,重点介绍关于乳房 X 光检查的证据,以及关于支持筛查知情决策的大组和小组讨论。在接触到有关乳房 X 光检查的研究证据后,参与者对自己对风险和益处缺乏全面了解表示担忧,并强烈希望在筛查方面有选择的机会。为了支持知情选择,乳房 X 光检查计划需要反映信息共享、信任和透明度、财务问责制的价值观,并允许进行个人互动和共同决策。公民正在寻找关于筛查风险和益处的平衡信息,以易于理解、全面和透明的方式呈现。初级保健提供者和有组织的筛查计划是乳房 X 光检查信息的重要来源,必须警惕在这一领域支持知情决策的努力,确保他们使用的信息材料是平衡的,并反映当前的证据。

相似文献

1
'I just want to be able to make a choice': Results from citizen deliberations about mammography screening in Ontario, Canada.“我只是想能够做出选择”:加拿大安大略省关于乳房 X 光筛查的公民审议结果。
Health Policy. 2018 Dec;122(12):1364-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no "right" answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study.在没有“正确”答案的情况下,支持平均风险的女性就乳腺钼靶检查做出明智决策:一项定性公民审议研究。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Dec 13;7(4):E730-E737. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190102. Print 2019 Oct-Dec.
3
How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.协商式方法如何让女性参与乳腺钼靶筛查决策:西班牙安达卢西亚的一项公民陪审团可行性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 May 5;8(5):e019852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019852.
4
Uncertain times: A survey of Canadian women's perspectives toward mammography screening.不确定时期:加拿大女性对乳房 X 光筛查看法的调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.关于乳腺钼靶筛查证据与争议的个性化知情选择:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3428-9.
6
Challenges of informed choice in organised screening.有组织筛查中知情选择的挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):e5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024802.
7
Decision-making about mammographic screening: pursuing informed choice.关于乳腺钼靶筛查的决策:追求知情选择。
Climacteric. 2018 Jun;21(3):209-213. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1406912. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.打印信息,以便就16个实施基于人群项目的国家中乳腺X线筛查参与情况做出决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):126-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.012.
9
Reconciling population benefits and women's individual autonomy in mammographic screening: in-depth interviews to explore women's views about 'informed choice'.协调乳腺钼靶筛查中的群体益处与女性个体自主性:深入访谈以探究女性对“知情选择”的看法
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005 Feb;29(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00752.x.
10
Family physicians' intention to support women in making informed decisions about breast cancer screening with mammography: a cross-sectional survey.家庭医生支持女性就乳腺钼靶筛查做出明智决策的意愿:一项横断面调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 10;8:663. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1608-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Do health professionals know about overdiagnosis in screening, and how are they dealing with it? A mixed-methods systematic scoping review.卫生专业人员是否了解筛查中的过度诊断,以及他们如何应对?一项混合方法的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0315247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315247. eCollection 2025.
2
Informed choices for some, but not for others: An exploration of Australian midlife women's participation in mammography screening by social class.对一些人是明智的选择,对另一些人则不然:按社会阶层对澳大利亚中年女性参与乳房X光检查筛查情况的一项探究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241305730. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305730.
3
Mammography screening: Eliciting the voices of informed citizens.
乳房X光检查筛查:倾听明智公民的声音。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0317263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317263. eCollection 2025.
4
Older people's perspectives on frailty screening in primary care settings - a citizens' jury study.老年人对基层医疗环境中衰弱筛查的看法——一项公民陪审团研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 2;25(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02626-8.
5
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.致密型乳腺人群乳腺癌筛查中补充性筛查作为乳腺 X 线摄影的辅助手段:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023.
6
Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.患者对乳腺癌筛查的偏好:为加拿大预防保健工作组的建议提供信息的系统评价更新。
Syst Rev. 2024 May 28;13(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8.
7
IMPAACT: IMproving the PArticipAtion of older people in policy decision-making on common health CondiTions - a study protocol.IMPAACT:提高老年人参与常见健康状况政策决策的参与度 - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):e075501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075501.
8
Using a Deliberative Poll on breast cancer screening to assess and improve the decision quality of laypeople.使用关于乳腺癌筛查的审议式民意测验来评估和提高非专业人士的决策质量。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 21;16(10):e0258869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258869. eCollection 2021.
9
Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada.将患者放在首位:加拿大患者期望的范围综述。
Healthc Policy. 2021 May;16(4):46-69. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26499.
10
Towards an Explanation of the Social Value of Health Systems: An Interpretive Synthesis.迈向健康系统社会价值解释之路:阐释性综合研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Jul 1;10(7):414-429. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.159.