• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉狭窄对生活质量的影响:系统评价。

Impact of Carotid Artery Stenosis on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 9HE, UK.

出版信息

Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):213-222. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0337-1.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-018-0337-1
PMID:30328068
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify themes that determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with carotid artery stenosis and identify the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that best cover the identified themes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the main six databases from inception to September 2018 was undertaken to identify primary qualitative studies reporting on the HRQoL of patients with carotid artery stenosis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) criteria. Findings from the included studies were analysed using framework analysis methodology. The identified themes were mapped against the items/domains from the PROMs used previously in patients with carotid artery stenosis.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified four papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The included papers reported the views of 62 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; 24 of the patients were awaiting assessment for intervention, 26 had carotid endarterectomy, and 12 were turned down for intervention and received best medical therapy. The overall quality of the included studies was good based on CASP criteria. Framework analysis identified 16 themes that were divided into five main domains: anxiety, impact on personal roles and activities, effect on independence, psychological impact, and symptoms. The best-fit generic and disease-specific PROMs were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) and the Carotid Stenosis Specific Outcome Measure (CSSOM), respectively. None of the PROMs covered all the themes identified in the qualitative systematic review.

CONCLUSION

The findings from the review identified the important themes that affect patients with carotid stenosis disease. The current generic and disease-specific PROMs do not cover all themes that impact the HRQoL of patients suffering with this disease. The proposed themes can be used to develop a new disease-specific PROM to measure HRQoL.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响颈动脉狭窄患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的主题,并确定能充分涵盖所确定主题的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。

方法

系统检索了从创建到 2018 年 9 月的六个主要数据库,以确定报告颈动脉狭窄患者 HRQoL 的主要定性研究。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)标准评估研究质量。使用框架分析方法对纳入研究的结果进行分析。将确定的主题与先前在颈动脉狭窄患者中使用的 PROM 的项目/领域进行映射。

结果

系统评价确定了 4 篇符合纳入标准的论文。纳入的论文报告了 62 例有症状颈动脉狭窄患者的观点;24 例患者正在等待评估以进行干预,26 例接受颈动脉内膜切除术,12 例因干预而被拒绝,接受最佳药物治疗。根据 CASP 标准,纳入研究的总体质量良好。框架分析确定了 16 个主题,分为五个主要领域:焦虑、对个人角色和活动的影响、对独立性的影响、心理影响和症状。最佳的通用和疾病特异性 PROM 分别是医疗结局研究 36 项简短量表(SF-36)和颈动脉狭窄特定结局测量(CSSOM)。没有任何 PROM 涵盖定性系统评价中确定的所有主题。

结论

该综述的结果确定了影响颈动脉狭窄患者的重要主题。目前的通用和疾病特异性 PROM 并未涵盖影响患有这种疾病的患者 HRQoL 的所有主题。拟议的主题可用于开发一种新的疾病特异性 PROM 来衡量 HRQoL。

相似文献

1
Impact of Carotid Artery Stenosis on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.颈动脉狭窄对生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):213-222. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0337-1.
2
Themes that Determine Quality of Life in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review.主题:决定外周动脉疾病患者生活质量的因素:系统评价。
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):489-502. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0307-7.
3
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Carotid Artery Revascularization: Systematic Review and Psychometric Analysis.颈动脉血运重建中患者报告的结局指标:系统评价与心理测量分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
A Delphi Consensus Study on Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient Reported Outcome Measures.行颈动脉内膜切除术患者报告结局测量的德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):787-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.037. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework.肌萎缩侧索硬化症中健康相关生活质量的测量:系统评价与概念框架
Neurology. 2024 Jul 23;103(2):e209549. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209549. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Changes in Cognition, Depression and Quality of Life after Carotid Stenosis Treatment.颈动脉狭窄治疗后认知功能、抑郁和生活质量的变化。
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2019;16(1):47-62. doi: 10.2174/1567202616666190129153409.
8
Comorbidities and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Revascularization for Asymptomatic Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Treated with Carotid Endarterectomy or Angioplasty with Stenting.无症状性重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术或血管成形术加支架置入后伴发疾病及健康相关生活质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 26;25:4734-4743. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916407.
9
Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.系统评价:通用多维儿童患者报告结局测量的概念、年龄、测量和评估考虑因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):379-431. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Health-related quality of life after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial).颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄后与健康相关的生活质量:CREST(颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive impairment and quality of life among patients with carotid artery stenosis in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.约旦颈动脉狭窄患者的认知障碍与生活质量:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04004-5.
2
Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey.下肢、颈动脉及主动脉疾病的自我报告结局:丹麦血管(DanVasc)调查方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e092479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092479.
3
Study Protocol for a Focus Group Discussion About the Patients' Perspective on Carotid Endarterectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Carotid Artery Revascularization: Systematic Review and Psychometric Analysis.颈动脉血运重建中患者报告的结局指标:系统评价与心理测量分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
2
Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy: a review of the literature.颈动脉内膜切除术后的生活质量:文献综述
Acta Neurol Belg. 2017 Dec;117(4):829-835. doi: 10.1007/s13760-017-0811-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
3
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?
关于患者对颈动脉内膜切除术看法的焦点小组讨论研究方案。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Apr;59(3):237-242. doi: 10.1177/15385744241286585. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
4
Omics Science and Social Aspects in Detecting Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes of Carotid Stenosis.检测颈动脉狭窄诊断、风险预测和结果的生物标志物的组学科学与社会方面。
Biomolecules. 2024 Aug 8;14(8):972. doi: 10.3390/biom14080972.
5
Effect of remimazolam versus propofol for the induction of general anesthesia on cerebral blood flow and oxygen saturation in elderly patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于行颈动脉内膜切除术老年患者全麻诱导对脑血流和氧饱和度的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 4;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02095-z.
6
Mixed methods study to develop the content validity and the conceptual framework of the electronic patient-reported outcome measure for vascular conditions.混合方法研究以建立血管疾病电子患者报告结局指标的内容效度和概念框架。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;10(8):e034154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034154.
7
Health-Related Quality of Life and Frailty in Chronic Liver Diseases.慢性肝病患者的健康相关生活质量与衰弱状况
Life (Basel). 2020 May 24;10(5):76. doi: 10.3390/life10050076.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Liver Diseases: A Strong Impact of Hand Grip Strength.慢性肝病患者的健康相关生活质量:握力的显著影响。
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 15;7(12):553. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120553.
系统评价和综合的定性证据质量评估:是否有意义,如果有,应该如何进行?
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):149-54. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1128. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
4
Impact of carotid stenting in dizzy patients with carotid stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术对伴有颈动脉狭窄的头晕患者的影响。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2014 Aug;77(8):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
5
Quality of life after TIA and stroke: ten-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study.短暂性脑缺血发作和中风后的生活质量:牛津血管研究十年结果。
Neurology. 2013 Oct 29;81(18):1588-95. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a9f45f. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.患者报告结局测量有助于改变医疗保健。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f167.
7
People's experiences of the impact of transient ischaemic attack and its consequences: qualitative study.人们对短暂性脑缺血发作及其后果影响的体验:定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Aug;68(8):1707-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05849.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
Health-related quality of life after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial).颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄后与健康相关的生活质量:CREST(颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.054.
9
The use of formal and informal knowledge sources in patients' treatment decisions in secondary stroke prevention: qualitative study.在二级卒中预防中,患者在治疗决策中使用正式和非正式知识源:定性研究。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e13-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00724.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial.成功颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状狭窄后 10 年的卒中预防(ACST-1):一项多中心随机试验。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1074-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X.