Hou Fang, Qi Ling, Liu Lingfei, Luo Xiu, Gu HuaiTing, Xie Xinyan, Li Xin, Zhang Jiajia, Song Ranran
Department of Maternal and Child Health, MOE Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
School of Health Science and Nursing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, China.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01915. eCollection 2018.
The study on developmental dyslexia (DD) has fairly matured in the past decades, even when there is a lack of a standardized and convenient instrument for dyslexia in the Chinese population. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children (DCCC), which was administered to Chinese students in primary school. A total of 545 students from grades 2 through 6 were recruited in Wuhan to participate in this study. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the structure validity of the DCCC. Concurrent validity was determined via correlations between the DCCC and the verbal comprehension index (VCI), and Chinese achievement. The reliability of the DCCC was assessed via test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The CFA suggested that the first order model with eight factors and 55 items fit the data well (RMSEA = 0.057, CFI = 0.930, and TLI = 0.925). The DCCC was negatively associated with VCI ( = -0.218) and Chinese achievement ( = -0.372). The test-retest reliability of the DCCC was 0.734, and the internal consistency of all subscales was above 0.752. The DCCC thus proved to have adequate validity and reliability to screen Chinese dyslexia among students in grades 2 through 6.
在过去几十年里,发育性阅读障碍(DD)的研究已相当成熟,尽管在中国人群中缺乏一种标准化且便捷的阅读障碍评估工具。本研究旨在评估《中国儿童阅读障碍检查表》(DCCC)的信效度,该检查表应用于中国小学生。在武汉共招募了545名二至六年级的学生参与本研究。我们使用验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估DCCC的结构效度。通过DCCC与言语理解指数(VCI)及语文成绩之间的相关性来确定同时效度。通过重测信度和内部一致性来评估DCCC的信度。CFA表明,具有八个因素和55个条目的一阶模型与数据拟合良好(RMSEA = 0.057,CFI = 0.930,TLI = 0.925)。DCCC与VCI(=-0.218)及语文成绩(=-0.372)呈负相关。DCCC的重测信度为0.734,所有子量表的内部一致性均高于0.752。因此,DCCC被证明在筛查二至六年级学生的中文阅读障碍方面具有足够的效度和信度。