Autism Clinic for Translational Research, Brain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, Australia.
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 26;8(1):233. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0282-8.
Impairments in social cognition are believed contribute to disability, particularly for disorders characterized by difficulties in social interaction. There has been little transdiagnostic investigation of this across social cognition domains in young adults. A total of 199 young adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; N = 53), early psychosis (EP; N = 51), and social anxiety disorder (SAD; N = 64) were compared against neurotypical controls (NT; N = 31) on a battery of lower and higher-order and self-report social cognition measures. For both ASD and EP, participants showed impaired performance on all lower-order emotion recognition tasks and one higher-order social cognition test. Self-reports of empathy were reduced in all clinical groups and particularly in ASD. For SAD, despite showing no objective social cognition impairment, self-reported empathy was reduced to the same level as EP. Discriminant analysis revealed that self-reported empathy and lower-order emotion recognition tests provide best capacity to differentiate groups. Regressions predicting disability revealed depression as the strongest predictor across all disability measures. Empathy provided additional predictive value for social disability and social interaction anxiety. Overall, results support a similar social-cognitive development profile across ASD and EP. While self-reported empathy differentiated between groups, discrepancy between objective social cognition test performance and self-reported empathy in the SAD group suggests probable threat-related self-monitoring report biases that likely further influence all group outcomes. As depression and empathy were the most important predictors of disability, regardless of diagnostic group, research is required to explore targeted interventions for difficulties in these domains to reduce disability.
社交认知障碍被认为会导致残疾,尤其是对于那些以社交互动困难为特征的障碍。在年轻成年人中,对跨诊断社交认知领域的这种障碍进行的研究很少。共有 199 名被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD;N = 53)、早期精神病 (EP;N = 51) 和社交焦虑障碍 (SAD;N = 64) 的年轻人与神经典型对照组 (NT;N = 31) 进行了一系列较低和较高阶以及自我报告的社交认知测试。对于 ASD 和 EP,参与者在所有较低阶情绪识别任务和一项较高阶社会认知测试中表现出受损的表现。所有临床组的同理心自我报告都减少了,尤其是在 ASD 中。对于 SAD,尽管没有表现出客观的社交认知障碍,但同理心的自我报告水平与 EP 相同。判别分析显示,自我报告的同理心和较低阶情绪识别测试提供了最佳的分组能力。预测残疾的回归分析显示,抑郁是所有残疾测量中最强的预测因子。同理心为社交残疾和社交互动焦虑提供了额外的预测价值。总体而言,结果支持 ASD 和 EP 之间相似的社交认知发展模式。虽然同理心的自我报告可以区分不同的组别,但 SAD 组中客观的社会认知测试表现和自我报告同理心之间的差异表明,可能存在与威胁相关的自我监测报告偏见,这可能进一步影响所有组别的结果。由于抑郁和同理心是残疾的最重要预测因素,无论诊断组别如何,都需要进行研究,以探索针对这些领域的困难进行有针对性的干预措施,以减少残疾。