• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性血流感染患者的临床特征、器官衰竭、炎症标志物和死亡率预测。

Clinical characteristics, organ failure, inflammatory markers and prediction of mortality in patients with community acquired bloodstream infection.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hanoi Medical University, no 1 Ton That Tung street, Dong Da district, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, 78 Giai Phong street, Dong Da district, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 26;18(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3448-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-3448-3
PMID:30367601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204014/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community acquired bloodstream infection (CABSI) in low- and middle income countries is associated with a high mortality. This study describes the clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and correlation of SOFA and qSOFA with mortality in patients with CABSI in northern Vietnam.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 393 patients with at least one positive blood culture with not more than one bacterium taken within 48 h of hospitalisation. Clinical characteristic and laboratory results from the first 24 h in hospital were collected. SOFA and qSOFA scores were calculated and their validity in this setting was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 393 patients with bacterial CABSI, approximately 80% (307/393) of patients had dysfunction of one or more organ on admission to the study hospital with the most common being that of coagulation (57.1% or 226/393). SOFA performed well in prediction of mortality in those patients initially admitted to the critical care unit (AUC 0.858, 95%CI 0.793-0.922) but poor in those admitted to medical wards (AUC 0.667, 95%CI 0.577-0.758). In contrast qSOFA had poor predictive validity in both settings (AUC 0.692, 95%CI 0.605-0.780 and AUC 0.527, 95%CI 0.424-0.630, respectively). The overall case fatality rate was 28%. HIV infection (HR = 3.145, p = 0.001), neutropenia (HR = 2.442, p = 0.002), SOFA score 1-point increment (HR = 1.19, p < 0.001) and infection with Enterobacteriaceae (HR = 1.722, p = 0.037) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ dysfunction was common among Vietnamese patients with CABSI and associated with high case fatality. SOFA and qSOFA both need to be further validated in this setting.

摘要

背景

在中低收入国家,社区获得性血流感染(CABSI)与高死亡率相关。本研究描述了越南北部 CABSI 患者的临床表现、实验室发现以及 SOFA 和 qSOFA 与死亡率的相关性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 393 例至少有一次阳性血培养且在入院后 48 小时内最多采集一次细菌的患者。收集了患者入院后前 24 小时的临床特征和实验室结果。计算了 SOFA 和 qSOFA 评分,并评估了其在该环境中的有效性。

结果

在 393 例患有细菌性 CABSI 的患者中,约 80%(307/393)的患者在入组研究医院时存在一个或多个器官功能障碍,最常见的是凝血功能障碍(57.1%或 226/393)。SOFA 对最初收入重症监护病房的患者的死亡率预测效果良好(AUC 0.858,95%CI 0.793-0.922),但对收入内科病房的患者预测效果不佳(AUC 0.667,95%CI 0.577-0.758)。相比之下,qSOFA 在这两种情况下的预测有效性都较差(AUC 0.692,95%CI 0.605-0.780 和 AUC 0.527,95%CI 0.424-0.630)。总的病死率为 28%。HIV 感染(HR=3.145,p=0.001)、中性粒细胞减少症(HR=2.442,p=0.002)、SOFA 评分增加 1 分(HR=1.19,p<0.001)和肠杆菌科感染(HR=1.722,p=0.037)是院内死亡的独立危险因素。

结论

越南 CABSI 患者中器官功能障碍很常见,与高病死率相关。SOFA 和 qSOFA 均需在此环境中进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba91/6204014/a040dcaeb698/12879_2018_3448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba91/6204014/a040dcaeb698/12879_2018_3448_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba91/6204014/a040dcaeb698/12879_2018_3448_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics, organ failure, inflammatory markers and prediction of mortality in patients with community acquired bloodstream infection.社区获得性血流感染患者的临床特征、器官衰竭、炎症标志物和死亡率预测。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 26;18(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3448-3.
2
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Efficacy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting clinical outcomes among community-acquired pneumonia patients presenting in the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估在预测急诊科就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者临床结局中的疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05044-0.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
5
Comparison of the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country.在一个中等收入国家,对入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者,比较序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)在预测死亡率和器官衰竭方面的表现。
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Comparison of qSOFA score, SOFA score, and SIRS criteria for the prediction of infection and mortality among surgical intermediate and intensive care patients.比较 qSOFA 评分、SOFA 评分和 SIRS 标准在预测外科中重症监护患者感染和死亡率中的应用。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00343-y.
7
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
8
Enhanced bedside mortality prediction combining point-of-care lactate and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in patients hospitalised with suspected infection in southeast Asia: a cohort study.在东南亚因疑似感染住院的患者中,结合床边即时乳酸和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分增强的床边死亡率预测:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Sep;10(9):e1281-e1288. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00277-7.
9
Prognostic Performance of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS in Kidney Transplant Recipients Suffering from Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study.SOFA、qSOFA 和 SIRS 在感染性肾移植受者中的预后性能:一项回顾性观察研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):1100-1113. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01225-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

引用本文的文献

1
Insight into the role of Streptococcus suis zinc metalloprotease C from the new serotype causing meningitis in piglets.从引起仔猪脑膜炎的新血清型链球菌锌金属蛋白酶 C 看其作用。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Jul 30;20(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03893-4.
2
Risk Factors for 30-Day Mortality of Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Patients in Changsha City, Hunan Province, China.中国湖南省长沙市社区获得性血流感染患者30天死亡率的危险因素
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Jul 24;17:3209-3218. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S471350. eCollection 2024.
3
Epidemiology and drug resistance analysis of bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit from a children's medical center in Eastern China for six consecutive years.

本文引用的文献

1
Strongyloides stercoralis seroprevalence in Vietnam.越南粪类圆线虫的血清阳性率
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Nov;145(15):3214-3218. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817002333. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
2
Bacterial bloodstream infections in a tertiary infectious diseases hospital in Northern Vietnam: aetiology, drug resistance, and treatment outcome.越南北方一家三级传染病医院的细菌血流感染:病因、耐药性及治疗结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2582-7.
3
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.
六年连续监测华东地区某儿童医院重症监护病房血流感染的流行病学和耐药性分析。
Int Microbiol. 2024 Oct;27(5):1345-1355. doi: 10.1007/s10123-024-00481-2. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Clinical characteristics of bloodstream infections in adult patients with solid tumours and a nomogram for mortality prediction: a 5-year case-controlled retrospective study in a tertiary-level hospital.成年实体瘤患者血流感染的临床特征和死亡率预测的列线图:一家三级医院的 5 年病例对照回顾性研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Aug 8;13:1228401. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1228401. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and validation of an emergency bloodstream infection score for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with community-acquired bloodstream infections.用于预测社区获得性血流感染患者院内死亡率的急诊血流感染评分的开发与验证
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(4):280-286. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.067.
6
Usefulness of procalcitonin at admission as a risk-stratifying biomarker for 50-day in-hospital mortality among patients with community-acquired bloodstream infection: an observational cohort study.入院时降钙素原作为社区获得性血流感染患者50天院内死亡风险分层生物标志物的效用:一项观察性队列研究。
Biomark Res. 2023 Jan 17;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00450-3.
7
Clinical factors predictive of Gram-negative bloodstream infection at the Emergency Department.急诊科革兰阴性菌血流感染的临床预测因素。
Germs. 2022 Jun 30;12(2):231-237. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1325. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Development of COVID-19 severity assessment score in adults presenting with COVID-19 to the emergency department.成人因 COVID-19 至急诊就诊的严重程度评估评分的制定。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07535-8.
9
Pathophysiologic Signatures of Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Adults.重症成年患者血流感染的病理生理特征
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Sep 23;2(10):e0191. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000191. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Variation in SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) Score Performance in Different Infectious States.SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)评分在不同感染状态下的表现差异。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1217-1222. doi: 10.1177/0885066620944879. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
5
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
6
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
7
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
8
Deaths: Final Data for 2014.死亡:2014年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Jun;65(4):1-122.
9
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
10
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.