Suppr超能文献

腹膜透析和中心血液透析患者对透析方式决策过程的看法。

Perceptions about the dialysis modality decision process among peritoneal dialysis and in-center hemodialysis patients.

机构信息

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, 340 E. Huron Street Suite 300, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.

University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1096-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients reaching end-stage renal disease must make a difficult decision regarding renal replacement therapy (RRT) options. Because the choice between dialysis modalities should include patient preferences, it is critical that patients are engaged in the dialysis modality decision. As part of the Empowering Patients on Choices for RRT (EPOCH-RRT) study, we assessed dialysis patients' perceptions of their dialysis modality decision-making process and the impact of their chosen modality on their lives.

METHODS

A 39-question survey was developed in collaboration with a multi-stakeholder advisory panel to assess perceptions of patients on either peritoneal dialysis (PD) or in-center hemodialysis (HD). The survey was disseminated to participants in the large US cohorts of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) and the Peritoneal DOPPS (PDOPPS). Survey responses were compared between PD and in-center HD patients using descriptive statistics, adjusted logistic generalized estimating equation models, and linear mixed regression models.

RESULTS

Six hundred fourteen PD and 1346 in-center HD participants responded. Compared with in-center HD participants, PD participants more frequently reported that they were engaged in the decision-making process, were provided enough information, understood differences between dialysis modalities, and felt satisfied with their modality choice. PD participants also reported more frequently than in-center HD participants that partners or spouses (79% vs. 70%), physician assistants (80% vs. 66%), and nursing staff (78% vs. 60%) had at least some involvement in the dialysis modality decision. Over 35% of PD and in-center HD participants did not know another dialysis patient at the time of their modality decision and over 60% did not know the disadvantages of their modality type. Participants using either dialysis modality perceived a moderate to high impact of dialysis on their lives.

CONCLUSIONS

PD participants were more engaged in the modality decision process compared to in-center HD participants. For both modalities, there is room for improvement in patient education and other support for patients choosing a dialysis modality.

摘要

背景

终末期肾病患者必须就肾脏替代治疗(RRT)方案做出艰难的决策。由于透析方式的选择应包括患者的偏好,因此让患者参与透析方式的决策至关重要。作为“选择肾脏替代治疗方案赋权患者(EPOCH-RRT)”研究的一部分,我们评估了透析患者对其透析方式决策过程的看法,以及他们选择的治疗方式对其生活的影响。

方法

与多利益相关方顾问小组合作,开发了一份包含 39 个问题的调查问卷,以评估腹膜透析(PD)或中心血液透析(HD)患者的看法。该调查问卷分发给美国 Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study(DOPPS)和 Peritoneal DOPPS(PDOPPS)的大型队列研究参与者。使用描述性统计、调整后的逻辑广义估计方程模型和线性混合回归模型比较 PD 和中心 HD 患者的调查结果。

结果

614 名 PD 和 1346 名中心 HD 参与者做出了回应。与中心 HD 参与者相比,PD 参与者更频繁地报告说他们参与了决策过程,获得了足够的信息,了解了不同透析方式之间的差异,对自己的治疗方式选择感到满意。PD 参与者还比中心 HD 参与者更频繁地报告说,他们的伴侣或配偶(79%比 70%)、医师助理(80%比 66%)和护理人员(78%比 60%)至少在一定程度上参与了透析方式的决策。超过 35%的 PD 和中心 HD 参与者在选择治疗方式时不认识另一名透析患者,超过 60%的参与者不了解他们选择的治疗方式的缺点。使用两种透析方式的参与者都认为透析对他们的生活有较大或中度的影响。

结论

与中心 HD 参与者相比,PD 参与者更积极地参与了治疗方式的决策过程。对于这两种透析方式,在为选择透析方式的患者提供教育和其他支持方面都有改进的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47a1/6206892/cfc78a5a3b06/12882_2018_1096_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验