Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0198499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198499. eCollection 2018.
The objective of this study was to examine public attitudes towards third-party reproduction and the disclosure of conception through third-party reproduction.
We conducted the web-based survey for the public attitude towards third-party reproduction in February 2014. Twenty-five hundred people were recruited with equal segregation of age (20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s) and gender. We analyzed the association between gender, age, infertility, and ethical view using a questionnaire regarding donor sperm, donor oocyte, donor embryo, gestational surrogacy, and disclosure to offspring.
Of the respondents, 36.2% approved and 26.6% disapproved of gamete or embryo donation. The frequency of those who approved was lowest in females in the 50-59 year age group, and was significantly higher in males or females with infertility. Secondly, 40.9% approved and 21.8% disapproved of gestational surrogacy. The frequency of those who approved gestational surrogacy was higher in males or females with infertility. Thirdly, 46.3% of respondents agreed and 20.4% disagreed with "offspring have the right to know their origin". Those who disagreed were primarily in the 50-59 year age group of both genders, and disagreement was significantly higher in the infertility group compared with non-infertility group.
In this study, public attitudes were affected by gender, age, and experience of infertility. These study findings are important in understanding the attitude towards third-party reproduction and disclosure to the offspring. Respondents having indecisive attitudes were >30%, which might indicate an increased requirement for information and education to enhance the discussion on the ethical consensus on third-party reproduction in Japan.
本研究旨在探讨公众对第三方生殖和通过第三方生殖披露受孕的态度。
我们于 2014 年 2 月进行了一项公众对第三方生殖态度的网络调查。我们招募了 2500 人,按年龄(20 多岁、30 多岁、40 多岁和 50 多岁)和性别均等分组。我们通过一份关于供精、供卵、供胚、代孕和向后代披露的问卷,分析了性别、年龄、不孕和伦理观点之间的关系。
在回答者中,36.2%赞成,26.6%反对配子或胚胎捐赠。在 50-59 岁年龄组的女性中,赞成的频率最低,而在不孕的男性或女性中则显著较高。其次,40.9%赞成,21.8%反对代孕。在不孕的男性或女性中,赞成代孕的频率较高。第三,46.3%的受访者同意,20.4%不同意“子女有权知道自己的出身”。不同意的主要是两性的 50-59 岁年龄组,而且不孕组的不同意率明显高于非不孕组。
在这项研究中,公众的态度受到性别、年龄和不孕经历的影响。这些研究结果对于理解对第三方生殖和向后代披露的态度很重要。持犹豫不决态度的受访者超过 30%,这可能表明需要更多的信息和教育,以加强对日本第三方生殖伦理共识的讨论。