Département of microbiologie, infectiologie et immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2(21):2862-2878. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018020123.
Classical CD16 vs intermediate/nonclassical CD16 monocytes differ in their homing potential and biological functions, but whether they differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs) with distinct contributions to immunity against bacterial/viral pathogens remains poorly investigated. Here, we employed a systems biology approach to identify clinically relevant differences between CD16 and CD16 monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs). Although both CD16 and CD16 MDDCs acquire classical immature/mature DC markers in vitro, genome-wide transcriptional profiling revealed unique molecular signatures for CD16 MDDCs, including adhesion molecules (ITGAE/CD103), transcription factors (TCF7L2/TCF4), and enzymes (ALDH1A2/RALDH2), whereas CD16 MDDCs exhibit a CDH1/E-cadherin phenotype. Of note, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) upregulated distinct transcripts in CD16 (eg, CCL8, SIGLEC1, MIR4439, SCIN, interleukin [IL]-7R, PLTP, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]) and CD16 MDDCs (eg, MMP10, MMP1, TGM2, IL-1A, TNFRSF11A, lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1, MMP8). Also, unique sets of HIV-modulated genes were identified in the 2 subsets. Further gene set enrichment analysis identified canonical pathways that pointed to "inflammation" as the major feature of CD16 MDDCs at immature stage and on LPS/HIV exposure. Finally, functional validations and meta-analysis comparing the transcriptome of monocyte and MDDC subsets revealed that CD16 vs CD16 monocytes preserved their superior ability to produce TNF-α and CCL22, as well as other sets of transcripts (eg, TCF4), during differentiation into DC. These results provide evidence that monocyte subsets are transcriptionally imprinted/programmed with specific differentiation fates, with intermediate/nonclassical CD16 monocytes being precursors for pro-inflammatory CD103RALDH2TCF4 DCs that may play key roles in mucosal immunity homeostasis/pathogenesis. Thus, alterations in the CD16 CD16 monocyte ratios during pathological conditions may dramatically influence the quality of MDDC-mediated immunity.
经典型 CD16 单核细胞与中间型/非经典型 CD16 单核细胞在归巢潜力和生物学功能上存在差异,但它们是否分化为具有不同贡献的树突状细胞 (DC) 以对抗细菌/病毒病原体仍知之甚少。在这里,我们采用系统生物学方法来鉴定 CD16 和 CD16 单核细胞衍生的 DC (MDDC) 之间具有临床相关性的差异。尽管 CD16 和 CD16 MDDC 在体外均获得经典的未成熟/成熟 DC 标志物,但全基因组转录谱分析显示 CD16 MDDC 具有独特的分子特征,包括粘附分子 (ITGAE/CD103)、转录因子 (TCF7L2/TCF4) 和酶 (ALDH1A2/RALDH2),而 CD16 MDDC 则表现出 CDH1/E-钙粘蛋白表型。值得注意的是,脂多糖 (LPS) 在 CD16 (例如 CCL8、SIGLEC1、MIR4439、SCIN、白细胞介素 [IL]-7R、PLTP、肿瘤坏死因子 [TNF]) 和 CD16 MDDC (例如 MMP10、MMP1、TGM2、IL-1A、TNFRSF11A、溶酶体相关膜蛋白 1、MMP8) 中上调了不同的转录本。此外,还在这两个亚群中鉴定到了独特的一组受 HIV 调节的基因。进一步的基因集富集分析确定了规范途径,指出“炎症”是未成熟阶段和 LPS/HIV 暴露时 CD16 MDDC 的主要特征。最后,对单核细胞和 MDDC 亚群的转录组进行功能验证和荟萃分析表明,与 CD16 单核细胞相比,CD16 单核细胞在分化为 DC 时仍能保持产生 TNF-α 和 CCL22 以及其他转录本 (例如 TCF4) 的优势。这些结果表明,单核细胞亚群在转录水平上被打上印记/编程,具有特定的分化命运,中间/非经典型 CD16 单核细胞是促炎型 CD103RALDH2TCF4 DC 的前体,可能在粘膜免疫稳态/发病机制中发挥关键作用。因此,病理条件下 CD16 CD16 单核细胞比值的改变可能会极大地影响 MDDC 介导的免疫质量。