• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生和导师关于抄袭与参考文献的知识及态度。

Students' and supervisors' knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing.

作者信息

Lindahl Johanna F, Grace Delia

机构信息

Department of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Regional Office, 298 Kim Ma Street, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi, 100 000 Vietnam.

2Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Oct 23;3:10. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0054-2. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s41073-018-0054-2
PMID:30386644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6198419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Referencing is an integral part of scientific writing and professional research conduct that requires appropriate acknowledgement of others' work and avoidance of plagiarism. University students should understand and apply this as part of their academic development, but for this, it is essential that supervisors also display proper research integrity and support.

METHODS

This study used an online educative questionnaire to understand the knowledge and attitudes of students and supervisors at two institutes in Europe and Africa. The results were then used to create discussion around education of students and faculty in workshops and lectures.

RESULTS

Overall, 138 students and 14 supervisors participated: most were Swedish (89) and Kenyan (11). Overall, 98% had heard about plagiarism, and 35% believed it was common. Only 45% had heard about self-plagiarism, and when explained what it was, 44.5% considered it morally wrong. Europeans and North Americans had more knowledge than other nationalities. Most (85%) had received some training on referencing, but there was little consensus about principles, with more than 30% considering it acceptable to cite a reference in a paper they had not read. Discussing these results and the questions in workshops was helpful; it was also clear that there was no consensus among supervisors on what constituted correct behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey shows a need for greater consensus on appropriate referencing, and that there is need for more discussions and training on the topic for both students and faculty.

摘要

背景

参考文献是科学写作和专业研究行为的一个组成部分,它要求对他人的工作给予恰当认可并避免抄袭。大学生应将其理解并应用于自身学术发展,但为此,导师也必须展现出恰当的研究诚信并给予支持。

方法

本研究使用在线教育问卷来了解欧洲和非洲两所院校的学生和导师的知识水平及态度。然后利用研究结果在研讨会和讲座中围绕学生和教师的教育展开讨论。

结果

总体而言,138名学生和14名导师参与其中:大多数是瑞典人(89人)和肯尼亚人(11人)。总体来看,98%的人听说过抄袭,35%的人认为抄袭很常见。只有45%的人听说过自我抄袭,在解释了自我抄袭是什么之后,44.5%的人认为这在道德上是错误的。欧洲人和北美人比其他国籍的人知识更丰富。大多数人(85%)接受过一些关于参考文献的培训,但在原则方面几乎没有达成共识,超过30%的人认为在一篇他们没有读过的论文中引用参考文献是可以接受的。在研讨会上讨论这些结果和问题很有帮助;同样明显的是,导师们对于什么构成正确行为并没有达成共识。

结论

这项调查表明,在适当引用参考文献方面需要达成更大的共识,并且学生和教师都需要就该主题进行更多的讨论和培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/06ea49abbe01/41073_2018_54_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/5ffd469d26e1/41073_2018_54_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/d58350d7b7e4/41073_2018_54_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/c70c9693a6fd/41073_2018_54_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/06ea49abbe01/41073_2018_54_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/5ffd469d26e1/41073_2018_54_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/d58350d7b7e4/41073_2018_54_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/c70c9693a6fd/41073_2018_54_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c704/6198419/06ea49abbe01/41073_2018_54_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Students' and supervisors' knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing.学生和导师关于抄袭与参考文献的知识及态度。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Oct 23;3:10. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0054-2. eCollection 2018.
2
Attitudes and Knowledge About Plagiarism Among University Students: Cross-Sectional Survey at the University of Split, Croatia.大学生对剽窃的态度和认知:克罗地亚斯普利特大学的横断面调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Oct;25(5):1467-1483. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0073-x. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Assessing knowledge of and attitudes towards plagiarism and ability to recognize plagiaristic writing among university students in Rwanda.评估卢旺达大学生对抄袭的认知与态度以及识别抄袭作品的能力。
High Educ (Dordr). 2023;85(2):247-263. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00830-y. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.科学写作中的文字剽窃:中国导师对抄袭的看法以及如何减少学生写作中的抄袭行为
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):569-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9342-7. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
5
Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.探究巴基斯坦医学教员和学生对抄袭的态度:一项横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1031. eCollection 2015.
6
Chinese graduate students' perceptions of plagiarism: A mixed-methods study.中国研究生对抄袭的认知:一项混合方法研究。
Account Res. 2021 May;28(4):197-225. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1819253. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Research integrity awareness among biology students - Experience from the University of Belgrade.生物专业学生的科研诚信意识——来自贝尔格莱德大学的经验
Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):331-348. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1843445. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
8
Postgraduate students' perception of plagiarism, awareness, and use of Turnitin text-matching software.研究生对剽窃的认知、意识以及对Turnitin文本匹配软件的使用情况。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):786-802. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2171790. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
9
Plagiarism in nursing education: an integrative review.护理教育中的抄袭现象:一项综合综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):2845-2864. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13629. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Plagiarism among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.护理专业学生中的剽窃行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Dec;69(4):492-502. doi: 10.1111/inr.12755. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Do biomedical researchers differ in their perceptions of plagiarism across Europe? Findings from an online survey among leading universities.生物医学研究人员在欧洲对剽窃的看法是否存在差异?一项针对顶尖大学的在线调查结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 8;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00818-4.
2
Knowledge and Attitude of Saudi Students towards Plagiarism-A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.沙特学生对抄袭的认知和态度——一项横断面调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312303.
3
Self-Reported Academic Misconduct among Medical Students: Perception and Prevalence.

本文引用的文献

1
Where literature is scarce: observations and lessons learnt from four systematic reviews of zoonoses in African countries.在文献匮乏的地区:从对非洲国家人畜共患病的四项系统评价中获得的观察结果与经验教训
Anim Health Res Rev. 2016 Jun;17(1):28-38. doi: 10.1017/S1466252316000104.
2
Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.探究巴基斯坦医学教员和学生对抄袭的态度:一项横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1031. eCollection 2015.
3
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
医学生自我报告的学术不端行为:认知与流行率。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Aug 23;2021:5580797. doi: 10.1155/2021/5580797. eCollection 2021.
4
MooSciTIC: Training of trainers in West African research and higher education.西非研究与高等教育培训师培训。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Jun 7;17(6):e3000312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000312. eCollection 2019 Jun.
为什么科学撤稿的数量增加了?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e68397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068397. Print 2013.
4
Construction of knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire for assessing plagiarism.用于评估抄袭行为的知识、态度和实践调查问卷的构建
Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(11):54-8. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
5
Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education.基于文本的科学出版中的剽窃:问题、发展与教育。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1241-54. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9367-6. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
6
Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.科学写作中的文字剽窃:中国导师对抄袭的看法以及如何减少学生写作中的抄袭行为
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):569-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9342-7. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire.关于抄袭态度问卷的构建与验证
Croat Med J. 2010 Jun;51(3):195-201. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195.
8
Policing plagiarism.打击剽窃行为。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):963-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39388.668773.47.