• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有色人种社区对野火的不平等脆弱性。

The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire.

机构信息

School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

The Nature Conservancy, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0205825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205825. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0205825
PMID:30388129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6214520/
Abstract

Globally, environmental disasters impact billions of people and cost trillions of dollars in damage, and their impacts are often felt most acutely by minority and poor communities. Wildfires in the U.S. have similarly outsized impacts on vulnerable communities, though the ethnic and geographic distribution of those communities may be different than for other hazards. Here, we develop a social-ecological approach for characterizing fire vulnerability and apply it to >70,000 census tracts across the United States. Our approach incorporates both the wildfire potential of a landscape and socioeconomic attributes of overlying communities. We find that over 29 million Americans live with significant potential for extreme wildfires, a majority of whom are white and socioeconomically secure. Within this segment, however, are 12 million socially vulnerable Americans for whom a wildfire event could be devastating. Additionally, wildfire vulnerability is spread unequally across race and ethnicity, with census tracts that were majority Black, Hispanic or Native American experiencing ca. 50% greater vulnerability to wildfire compared to other census tracts. Embracing a social-ecological perspective of fire-prone landscapes allows for the identification of areas that are poorly equipped to respond to wildfires.

摘要

从全球范围来看,环境灾害影响了数十亿人,并造成数万亿美元的损失,而少数族裔和贫困社区受到的影响最为严重。美国的野火对弱势群体社区也有类似的巨大影响,但这些社区的种族和地理分布可能与其他灾害不同。在这里,我们开发了一种用于描述火灾脆弱性的社会生态方法,并将其应用于美国超过 70000 个普查区。我们的方法结合了景观的野火潜力和覆盖社区的社会经济属性。我们发现,超过 2900 万美国人生活在极端野火的巨大潜在风险中,其中大多数是白人和社会经济上有保障的。然而,在这一群体中,有 1200 万社会弱势群体的美国人,野火事件对他们来说可能是毁灭性的。此外,野火脆弱性在种族和族裔之间分布不均,黑人、西班牙裔或美国原住民占多数的普查区受到野火的影响比其他普查区高约 50%。从易发生火灾的景观的社会生态角度出发,可以确定那些应对野火能力不足的地区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f61/6214520/7ad4b78c4104/pone.0205825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f61/6214520/7ad4b78c4104/pone.0205825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f61/6214520/7ad4b78c4104/pone.0205825.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire.有色人种社区对野火的不平等脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0205825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205825. eCollection 2018.
2
Wildfires and climate justice: future wildfire events predicted to disproportionally impact socioeconomically vulnerable communities in North Carolina.野火与气候正义:未来的野火事件预计将不成比例地影响北卡罗来纳州社会经济弱势群体社区。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 29;12:1339700. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339700. eCollection 2024.
3
Disproportionate Impacts of Wildfires among Elderly and Low-Income Communities in California from 2000-2020.2000 - 2020年加利福尼亚州野火对老年人和低收入社区的不均衡影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083921.
4
A burning issue: Reviewing the socio-demographic and environmental justice aspects of the wildfire literature.一个亟待解决的问题:回顾野火文献中的社会人口和环境正义方面。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271019. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding the Factors that Influence Perceptions of Post-Wildfire Landscape Recovery Across 25 Wildfires in the Northwestern United States.理解影响美国西北部 25 起野火后景观恢复感知的因素。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jan;61(1):85-102. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0962-9. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
6
Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States.人为引发的野火在美国扩大了火灾生态位。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):2946-2951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617394114. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Do wildfires exacerbate COVID-19 infections and deaths in vulnerable communities? Evidence from California.野火是否会使弱势社区的 COVID-19 感染和死亡人数恶化?来自加利福尼亚州的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 15;328:116918. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116918. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
8
A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke.对非职业性接触野火烟雾对身体健康影响的系统评价。
Environ Res. 2015 Jan;136:120-32. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Democratizing wildfire strategies. Do you realize what it means? Insights from a participatory process in the Montseny region (Catalonia, Spain).民主化野火策略。你知道这意味着什么吗?来自蒙塞尼地区(西班牙加泰罗尼亚)参与式过程的见解。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 16;13(10):e0204806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204806. eCollection 2018.
10
Subsidized Households and Wildfire Hazards in California.加利福尼亚的补贴家庭与野火危害。
Environ Manage. 2020 Nov;66(5):873-883. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01340-2. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exodus of the affluent? examining climate hazards, migration, and household income in the U.S.富人外流?审视美国的气候灾害、移民与家庭收入
Popul Environ. 2025;47(3):28. doi: 10.1007/s11111-025-00496-5. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Coexposure to extreme heat, wildfire burn zones, and wildfire smoke in the Western US from 2006 to 2020.2006年至2020年美国西部同时暴露于极端高温、野火燃烧区域和野火烟雾之中。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 2;11(18):eadq6453. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq6453. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Mitigation justice.缓解正义。

本文引用的文献

1
The Science of Firescapes: Achieving Fire-Resilient Communities.防火通道科学:打造具备火灾抵御能力的社区
Bioscience. 2016 Feb 1;66(2):130-146. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv182. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
Constructing the Indicators of Assessing Human Vulnerability to Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Consensus-based Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach.构建评估人类对工业化学事故脆弱性的指标:基于共识的模糊德尔菲法和模糊层次分析法
PLoS Curr. 2017 Apr 10;9:ecurrents.dis.526884afe308f8876dce69c545357ecd. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.526884afe308f8876dce69c545357ecd.
3
Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 29;122(17):e2411231122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2411231122. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
4
Racial-ethnic composition of U.S. school districts, wildfire smoke PM levels, and reduced in-person learning among schoolchildren and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国学区的种族构成、野火烟雾中的细颗粒物水平以及新冠疫情期间学童和青少年线下学习的减少情况。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Mar 13;53:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103033. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Quantifying wildfire risk to the built environment in rural rangelands of the US Interior West.量化美国内陆西部农村牧场建筑环境面临的野火风险。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;380(1924):20230457. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0457. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
6
Wildfire and Smoke Risk Communication: A Systematic Literature Review from a Health Equity Focus.野火与烟雾风险沟通:以健康公平为重点的系统文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;22(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030368.
7
In this current wildfire crisis, acknowledge widespread suffering.在当前这场野火危机中,承认广泛存在的苦难。
Ambio. 2025 May;54(5):759-773. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02105-5. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
8
Household needs among wildfire survivors in the 2017 Northern California wildfires.2017年北加利福尼亚野火中野火幸存者的家庭需求。
Environ Res Health. 2025 Mar 1;3(1):015008. doi: 10.1088/2752-5309/ad951c. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
9
Roof renewal disparities widen the equity gap in residential wildfire protection.屋顶翻新差异加剧了住宅野火防护方面的公平差距。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 7;16(1):463. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55705-w.
10
Applying a two-stage generalized synthetic control approach to quantify the heterogeneous health effects of extreme weather events: A 2018 large wildfire in California event as a case study.应用两阶段广义合成控制方法量化极端天气事件的异质健康影响:以2018年加利福尼亚州大型野火事件为例进行研究。
Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 31;9(1):e362. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000362. eCollection 2025 Feb.
随着气候变化,北美西部森林要适应更多野火。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):4582-4590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617464114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world.野火的全球趋势及其影响:变化世界中的认知与现实
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 5;371(1696). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0345.
5
SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY. Engage key social concepts for sustainability.社会科学与可持续性。运用关键社会概念实现可持续性。
Science. 2016 Apr 1;352(6281):38-40. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4977.
6
How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface.如何通过风险管理预防城乡交错带未来的野火灾害。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):746-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315088111. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
7
Situating hazard vulnerability: people's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. southwest.定位灾害脆弱性:美国西南部民众与野火环境的协商
Environ Manage. 2009 Sep;44(3):441-55. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9333-5. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
8
RACE, INCOME, AND ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES.美国的种族、收入与环境不平等
Sociol Perspect. 2008 Dec 1;51(4):759-781. doi: 10.1525/sop.2008.51.4.759.
9
Fire in the Earth system.地球系统中的火灾。
Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):481-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1163886.
10
Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards.社会对自然灾害脆弱性的时空变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2301-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710375105. Epub 2008 Feb 11.