Suppr超能文献

零售禽肉中具有不同抗生素使用声明的耐药大肠杆菌。

Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims.

机构信息

George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.

Pathogen Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine if the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli differed across retail poultry products and among major production categories, including organic, "raised without antibiotics", and conventional.

RESULTS

We collected all available brands of retail chicken and turkey-including conventional, "raised without antibiotic", and organic products-every two weeks from January to December 2012. In total, E. coli was recovered from 91% of 546 turkey products tested and 88% of 1367 chicken products tested. The proportion of samples contaminated with E. coli was similar across all three production categories. Resistance prevalence varied by meat type and was highest among E. coli isolates from turkey for the majority of antibiotics tested. In general, production category had little effect on resistance prevalence among E. coli isolates from chicken, although resistance to gentamicin and multidrug resistance did vary. In contrast, resistance prevalence was significantly higher for 6 of the antibiotics tested-and multidrug resistance-among isolates from conventional turkey products when compared to those labelled organic or "raised without antibiotics". E. coli isolates from chicken varied strongly in resistance prevalence among different brands within each production category.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of resistance among E. coli isolates from conventionally-raised turkey meat suggests greater antimicrobial use in conventional turkey production as compared to "raised without antibiotics" and organic systems. However, among E. coli from chicken meat, resistance prevalence was more strongly linked to brand than to production category, which could be caused by brand-level differences during production and/or processing, including variations in antimicrobial use.

摘要

背景

我们试图确定零售禽类产品之间以及主要生产类别(包括有机、“无抗生素饲养”和常规)之间的抗生素耐药大肠杆菌的流行率是否存在差异。

结果

我们于 2012 年 1 月至 12 月每两周收集一次所有市售鸡肉和火鸡的品牌,包括常规、“无抗生素饲养”和有机产品。在总共测试的 546 个火鸡产品和 1367 个鸡肉产品中,大肠杆菌的回收率分别为 91%和 88%。三种生产类别中,受大肠杆菌污染的样品比例相似。耐药率因肉类类型而异,在大多数抗生素中,火鸡来源的大肠杆菌分离株的耐药率最高。一般来说,生产类别对鸡肉来源的大肠杆菌分离株的耐药率影响不大,但庆大霉素和多药耐药性有所不同。相比之下,与有机或“无抗生素饲养”标签产品相比,常规火鸡产品中 6 种抗生素的耐药率和多药耐药率明显更高。在每个生产类别中,不同品牌的鸡肉来源的大肠杆菌分离株的耐药率差异很大。

结论

与“无抗生素饲养”和有机系统相比,常规饲养火鸡肉中大肠杆菌分离株的高耐药率表明在常规火鸡生产中使用了更多的抗菌药物。然而,在鸡肉来源的大肠杆菌中,耐药率与品牌的关系比与生产类别的关系更密切,这可能是由于生产和/或加工过程中的品牌差异造成的,包括抗菌药物使用的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b43/6215666/6c80a9d564c6/12866_2018_1322_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验