Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche 'Togo Rosati', Perugia, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche 'Togo Rosati', Perugia, Italy.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2020 Feb 2;314:108391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108391. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Poultry production is the fastest growing meat sector worldwide. In the last five years, growing concerns have been expressed by international health agencies and consumers about the transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from poultry meat to human. Consequently, poultry producers have adopted alternative production systems based on reduced antibiotic usage, including organic and antibiotic-free (AF) production. However, the effect of these production systems on the antibiotic resistance of the gut flora in slaughtered poultry has been poorly investigated. We hypothesized that organic and AF production systems reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance in the commensal Escherichia coli of broilers at slaughter compared with conventional production. Cecal content from broilers raised in conventional (292), AF (291), or organic (272) flocks (855 broilers in total) belonging to the same company was sampled. E. coli loads [colony-forming units (CFU/g)] and numbers of E. coli resistant to nalidixic acid (E. coli) were determined for each sample. Antibiotic susceptibility of one isolate per sample was evaluated using the disc diffusion method; colistin resistance was determined by using the broth microdilution method. The differences in bacterial loads from the three production types were evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Differences in the proportion of resistant isolates in the three production lines were evaluated using Pearson's χ or Fisher's test. The strength of the association was evaluated by using odds ratio (OR), with the conventional production type as a reference (OR = 1). Overall, the analysis revealed a high level of resistance (50% or higher) to ampicillin, cefazolin, sulfonamides, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline, independently of the production type. High proportion of ciprofloxacin resistance (52%) was observed, with 4.5% isolates resistant to cefotaxime and 1.8% resistant to colistin. The average loads (log CFU/g cecal content) of E. coli were determined as 6.84 for AF, 6.38 for organic type, and 7.27 for conventional type. The difference was significant (p < 0.00001). Interestingly, broilers from AF flocks had higher E. coli loads than broilers from organic flocks. This trend (conventional > AF > organic) was confirmed by qualitative data. However, the magnitude of the effect, measured as a reduced risk of resistance, varied broadly for the antibiotics tested. These findings suggest that poultry production systems alternative to the conventional broiler production are associated with reduced frequency of antibiotic-resistant E. coli among the commensal gut flora, posing a lower risk to the environment and the consumer.
家禽生产是全球增长最快的肉类产业。在过去五年中,国际卫生机构和消费者越来越关注禽肉向人类传播抗生素耐药菌的问题。因此,家禽生产者采用了基于减少抗生素使用的替代生产系统,包括有机生产和无抗生产(AF)。然而,这些生产系统对屠宰家禽肠道菌群抗生素耐药性的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们假设与常规生产相比,有机和 AF 生产系统降低了屠宰肉鸡肠道共生大肠杆菌的抗生素耐药风险。从属于同一家公司的常规(292 只)、AF(291 只)或有机(272 只)鸡群中采集鸡盲肠内容物样本。对每个样本的大肠杆菌载量[菌落形成单位(CFU/g)]和耐萘啶酸的大肠杆菌数量(E. coli)进行了测定。使用纸片扩散法评估了每个样本一个分离株的抗生素敏感性;使用肉汤微量稀释法确定了粘菌素耐药性。使用单向方差分析评估了三种生产类型之间的细菌载量差异。使用 Pearson χ或 Fisher 检验评估了三种生产线上耐药分离株的比例差异。使用比值比(OR)评估关联强度,以常规生产类型为参照(OR=1)。总的来说,无论生产类型如何,氨苄西林、头孢唑林、磺胺类、萘啶酸和四环素的耐药率均在 50%或以上。观察到环丙沙星耐药率较高(52%),4.5%的分离株对头孢噻肟耐药,1.8%的分离株对粘菌素耐药。AF 组大肠杆菌的平均载量(盲肠内容物 log CFU/g)为 6.84,有机组为 6.38,常规组为 7.27。差异具有统计学意义(p<0.00001)。有趣的是,AF 组鸡的大肠杆菌载量高于有机组鸡。这一趋势(常规>AF>有机)得到了定性数据的证实。然而,在所测试的抗生素中,耐药风险降低的幅度因抗生素而异。这些发现表明,替代常规肉鸡生产的家禽生产系统与肠道共生菌群中抗生素耐药大肠杆菌的频率降低有关,从而降低了对环境和消费者的风险。