Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 5;13(11):e0206341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206341. eCollection 2018.
Protocols for testing and reporting emissions of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) from electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are lacking. The premise of this study is that multi-path relationships may be developed to describe interactions between product characteristics, use behavior and emissions to develop appropriate protocols for tobacco product regulatory compliance testing.
This study proposes a framework consisting of three component terms: HPHC mass concentration, HPHC mass ratio and total particulate mass (TPM) concentration. The framework informs experiments to investigate dependence of aerosol emissions from five electronic cigarettes spanning several design generations and three e-liquids for six repeated trials at each of ten flow conditions.
Results are reported for TPM concentration as a function of flow conditions spanning the range of natural environment topography observed in prior studies. An empirical correlation describing TPM concentration as a function of flow conditions and coil power setting (6, 7.5 and 10 watts) for the Innokin iTaste MVP 2.0 vaporizer with Innokin iClear 30 dual coil tank is presented. Additional results document the impact of flow conditions and wick and coil design on TPM concentration through comparison of the Innokin iClear 30 (upper coil, capillary action wick) and the Innokin iClear X.I (lower coil, gravity fed wick) operated at 7.5 watts. The impact of e-liquid on TPM concentration is illustrated by comparing emissions from an NJOY Vape Pen filled with AVAIL Arctic Blast, Tobacco Row, and Mardi Gras e-liquids. TPM concentration is shown to depend upon flow conditions across a range of e-cigarette product designs including cig-a-like, pen-style, box-mod and emergent disposable-cartridge style devices.
A framework provides a foundation for reporting emissions across a variety of e-cigs, e-liquids and research laboratories. The study demonstrates TPM concentration is a function of topography behavior (i.e. puff flow rate and puff duration) for varying device operating power and product characteristics.
目前缺乏针对电子烟中有害和潜在有害成分(HPHC)排放测试和报告的协议。本研究的前提是可以开发多路径关系来描述产品特性、使用行为和排放之间的相互作用,从而为烟草产品法规遵从性测试制定适当的协议。
本研究提出了一个由三个组成部分组成的框架:HPHC 质量浓度、HPHC 质量比和总颗粒质量(TPM)浓度。该框架为实验提供了信息,以研究跨越几个设计代际的五种电子烟和三种电子烟液在每个流量条件下的六个重复试验中气溶胶排放的依赖性。
报告了 TPM 浓度作为流量条件的函数,涵盖了先前研究中观察到的自然环境地形范围。提出了一个经验相关性,描述了 TPM 浓度作为流量条件和线圈功率设置(6、7.5 和 10 瓦)的函数,适用于 Innokin iTaste MVP 2.0 汽化器与 Innokin iClear 30 双线圈罐。其他结果通过比较 Innokin iClear 30(上线圈,毛细作用芯)和 Innokin iClear X.I(下线圈,重力供油芯)在 7.5 瓦下的运行,记录了流量条件和芯吸和线圈设计对 TPM 浓度的影响。通过比较 NJOY Vape Pen 填充的 AVAIL Arctic Blast、Tobacco Row 和 Mardi Gras 电子烟液的排放,说明了电子烟液对 TPM 浓度的影响。结果表明,TPM 浓度取决于跨越各种电子烟、电子烟液和研究实验室的产品设计的流量条件。该研究表明,TPM 浓度是地形行为(即抽吸流量率和抽吸持续时间)的函数,适用于不同的设备运行功率和产品特性。