• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对芒果过敏患者的过敏反应。

Anaphylactic reaction in patient allergic to mango.

作者信息

Ukleja-Sokołowska Natalia, Gawrońska-Ukleja Ewa, Lis Kinga, Żbikowska-Gotz Magdalena, Sokołowski Łukasz, Bartuzi Zbigniew

机构信息

1Department and Clinic of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, NCU, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

2Division of Ergonomics and Exercise Physiology, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Ergonomics, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, NCU, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct 31;14:78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0294-1. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13223-018-0294-1
PMID:30410550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6211424/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An allergy to mango is extremely rare. The antigenic composition of the fruit is not fully known. Profilin from mango has a structure similar to birch tree profiling: it is responsible for cross-reactions between mango and pear, apple, and peach. A panallergen with a structure similar to mugwort defensin (Art v 1) which cross-reacts with celery, carrot, peanuts, pepper, aniseed, and caraway has been previously described.

CASE STUDY

A female patient, 30 years old, was admitted in February 2017 because of recurrent allergic reactions following consumption of various foods. The most severe allergic reaction in the patient's life occurred after eating a mango fruit. Within several minutes the patient developed a generalised urticaria, followed by facial oedema, strong stomach pain and watery diarrhoea. The diagnostics involved skin tests with a set of inhalatory and food allergens, including native skin tests. The patient also experienced symptoms of recurrent, generalized urticaria in connection with consumption of various types of food, especially complex dishes containing many different ingredients. Additionally, an interview revealed that the patient was experiencing symptoms of the oral allergy syndrome after ingesting various fruit and vegetables, especially during late summer and fall. Diagnostics was extended by determining the levels of IgE specific for allergen components, using the ImmunoCap ISAC method. In order to confirm the occurence of a cross-reaction between mugwort and mango allergens, we performed the inhibition test of IgE specific for mugwort using a mango allergen extract and ImmunoCap matrix.

RESULTS

Skin prick tests (SPT) were positive for allergens of grass 7 mm; weeds 8 mm; cat's fur 5 mm; mugwort 6 mm. SPT were also positive for mango. The level of specific IgE was increased for allergens of mugwort, grass, celery, pepper, carrot, mango, banana, peach, and apple. The ImmunoCap ISAC test demonstrated a high level of specific IgE rPhl p 1 (timothy grass) and Art v 1 (mugwort). We also performed the IgE inhibition test using both mango extract and ImmunoCap matrix and confirmed a cross-reaction with Art v 1 in the pathogenesis of symptoms observed in the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

An anaphylactic reaction to consumed mango, resulting from cross-allergy with mugwort Art v 1 was diagnosed in the patient. Acute urticarial in this case is a manifestation of IgE-mediated food allergy. During in vitro diagnostic procedures we found an elevated concentration of IgE specific to several food allergens (including celery, peppers, carrot, banana, peach, apple, shrimp). The elimination diet removing allergens the patient was allergic to was recommended. Considering the anaphylactic reaction the patient was instructed to carry a rescue set composed of an adrenaline autosyringe, steroids, and antihistamines.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/6211424/280a175072cb/13223_2018_294_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/6211424/e9e7e378a2fa/13223_2018_294_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/6211424/280a175072cb/13223_2018_294_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/6211424/e9e7e378a2fa/13223_2018_294_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/148e/6211424/280a175072cb/13223_2018_294_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

对芒果过敏极为罕见。该水果的抗原成分尚不完全清楚。芒果中的肌动蛋白与桦树肌动蛋白结构相似:它是芒果与梨、苹果和桃子之间交叉反应的原因。此前已描述过一种与艾蒿防御素(Art v 1)结构相似的泛过敏原,它与芹菜、胡萝卜、花生、胡椒、茴芹和葛缕子会发生交叉反应。

病例研究

一名30岁女性患者于2017年2月因食用各种食物后反复出现过敏反应入院。患者一生中最严重的过敏反应发生在食用芒果后。几分钟内,患者出现全身性荨麻疹,随后出现面部水肿、剧烈胃痛和水样腹泻。诊断包括用一组吸入性和食物过敏原进行皮肤试验,包括天然皮肤试验。患者在食用各种类型的食物,尤其是含有许多不同成分的复杂菜肴时,也会出现反复全身性荨麻疹的症状。此外,通过访谈发现,患者在摄入各种水果和蔬菜后,尤其是在夏末和秋季,会出现口腔过敏综合征的症状。通过使用ImmunoCap ISAC方法测定过敏原成分特异性IgE水平,扩展了诊断。为了证实艾蒿和芒果过敏原之间交叉反应的发生,我们使用芒果过敏原提取物和ImmunoCap基质对艾蒿特异性IgE进行了抑制试验。

结果

皮肤点刺试验(SPT)对草类过敏原呈阳性反应(7毫米);对杂草呈阳性反应(8毫米);对猫毛呈阳性反应(5毫米);对艾蒿呈阳性反应(6毫米)。SPT对芒果也呈阳性反应。艾蒿、草类、芹菜、胡椒、胡萝卜、芒果、香蕉、桃子和苹果的过敏原特异性IgE水平升高。ImmunoCap ISAC试验显示特异性IgE rPhl p 1(梯牧草)和Art v 1(艾蒿)水平较高。我们还使用芒果提取物和ImmunoCap基质进行了IgE抑制试验,并证实了在患者观察到的症状发病机制中与Art v 1存在交叉反应。

结论

诊断该患者对食用芒果发生过敏反应,是由与艾蒿Art v 1交叉过敏所致。该病例中的急性荨麻疹是IgE介导的食物过敏的一种表现。在体外诊断过程中,我们发现几种食物过敏原(包括芹菜、胡椒、胡萝卜、香蕉、桃子、苹果、虾)特异性IgE浓度升高。建议采用排除饮食法去除患者过敏的过敏原。考虑到过敏反应,指示患者携带由肾上腺素自动注射器、类固醇和抗组胺药组成的急救用品。

相似文献

1
Anaphylactic reaction in patient allergic to mango.对芒果过敏患者的过敏反应。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct 31;14:78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0294-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Sunflower seed allergy.向日葵籽过敏
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;29(3):498-503. doi: 10.1177/0394632016651648. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Identification of a 60 kd cross-reactive allergen in pollen and plant-derived food.在花粉和植物源性食物中鉴定出一种60kd的交叉反应性变应原。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):938-47. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80010-8.
4
Microarray Analysis Confirms ImmunoCAP-Fluorescence Enzyme Immunoassay Results on Specific IgE in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Suspected Birch Pollen-Related Food Allergy.微阵列分析证实了特应性皮炎和疑似桦树花粉相关食物过敏患者的特异性 IgE 免疫 CAP-荧光酶免疫分析结果。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(8):814-823. doi: 10.1159/000522525. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
[Food allergy: the celery-mugwort-spice syndrome. Association with mango allergy?].[食物过敏:芹菜-艾蒿-香料综合征。与芒果过敏有关联吗?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1984 Jun 22;109(25):981-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1069310.
6
Carrot allergy: double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge and identification of allergens.胡萝卜过敏:双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验及过敏原鉴定
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Aug;108(2):301-7. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.116430.
7
Three patterns of sensitization to mugwort, timothy, birch and their major allergen components revealed by Latent class analysis.通过潜在类别分析揭示的对艾蒿、梯牧草、桦树及其主要过敏原成分的三种致敏模式。
Mol Immunol. 2022 May;145:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Profilin sensitization detected in the office by skin prick test: a study of prevalence and clinical relevance of profilin as a plant food allergen.通过皮肤点刺试验在门诊检测到的肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏:关于肌动蛋白结合蛋白作为植物性食物过敏原的患病率及临床相关性的研究
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jun;38(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02980.x. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
9
Allergic sensitization to native and heated celery root in pollen-sensitive patients investigated by skin test and IgE binding.通过皮肤试验和IgE结合对花粉敏感患者中对天然和加热芹菜根的过敏致敏情况进行研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1996 Nov;111(3):268-78. doi: 10.1159/000237377.
10
Severe oral allergy syndrome and anaphylactic reactions caused by a Bet v 1- related PR-10 protein in soybean, SAM22.大豆中一种与Bet v 1相关的病程相关蛋白10(PR-10)——SAM22引起的严重口腔过敏综合征和过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Nov;110(5):797-804. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.128946.

引用本文的文献

1
Current State of Celery Allergy: Is Discovering Api g 7 a Milestone in Diagnosing Celeriac-Allergic Patients?芹菜过敏的现状:发现Api g 7是诊断芹菜过敏患者的一个里程碑吗?
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 18;26(12):5840. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125840.
2
Allergic Risk Among the Children in Southern China: The Association of Influencing Factors with the Allergen Distribution.中国南方儿童的过敏风险:影响因素与过敏原分布的关联
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Jun 6;18:955-966. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S522153. eCollection 2025.
3
Allergic Potential of Medicinal Plants From the Asteraceae Family.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinct epitope structures of defensin-like proteins linked to proline-rich regions give rise to differences in their allergenic activity.富含脯氨酸的防御素样蛋白的独特表位结构导致其变应原活性的差异。
Allergy. 2018 Feb;73(2):431-441. doi: 10.1111/all.13298. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
Comparison of the Performance of Skin Prick, ImmunoCAP, and ISAC Tests in the Diagnosis of Patients with Allergy.皮肤点刺试验、免疫CAP检测和ISAC检测在过敏患者诊断中的性能比较
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(4):215-223. doi: 10.1159/000464326. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
3
Low percentage of clinically relevant pistachio nut and mango co-sensitisation in cashew nut sensitised children.
菊科药用植物的过敏潜力。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 23;8(2):e70398. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70398. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Allergic reactions to horse chestnut seeds are caused by mugwort pollen Art v 1-sensitization and represent a novel type of defensin-related allergy syndrome.对七叶树种子的过敏反应是由艾蒿花粉Art v 1致敏引起的,代表了一种新型的防御素相关过敏综合征。
Allergy. 2025 Feb;80(2):611-614. doi: 10.1111/all.16335. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Food-Pollen Cross-Reactivity and its Molecular Diagnosis in China.食物-花粉交叉反应及其在中国的分子诊断。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):497-508. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01162-w. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
The use of inhibition assay in Api g 7 suspected allergy in a female patient with anaphylaxis: A case report.Api g 7 过敏疑似患者的抑制试验使用:一例过敏反应女性患者的案例报告。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2024 Jan-Dec;38:3946320231223004. doi: 10.1177/03946320231223004.
7
Clinical Use of the ImmunoCAP Inhibition Test in the Diagnosis of Meat Allergy Caused by a Tick Bite in an Adult Male with No Previous Atopic History.免疫捕获抑制试验在一名无特应性病史成年男性蜱叮咬所致肉类过敏诊断中的临床应用
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;13(3):699. doi: 10.3390/life13030699.
8
The Two-Sided Experimental Model of ImmunoCAP Inhibition Test as a Useful Tool for the Examination of Allergens Cross-Reactivity on the Example of α-Gal and Mammalian Meat Sensitization-A Preliminary Study.免疫捕获抑制试验的双侧实验模型作为检测过敏原交叉反应性的有用工具——以α-半乳糖和哺乳动物肉类致敏为例的初步研究
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023 Feb 1;45(2):1168-1182. doi: 10.3390/cimb45020077.
9
Experimental Research Models to Assess the Cross-Reactivity between Can f 5 and Human PSA-Two Different Perspectives.评估 Can f 5 与人类 PSA 之间交叉反应性的实验研究模型——两种不同视角。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 23;23(19):11223. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911223.
10
Anaphylaxis to mango fruit.芒果过敏反应。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Apr;39(2):416-417. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.115894. Epub 2022 May 9.
腰果致敏儿童中,开心果和芒果临床相关共同致敏的比例较低。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Mar 20;7:8. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0145-z. eCollection 2017.
4
Cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant major mango allergen Man i 1 in Escherichia coli.重组芒果主要过敏原Man i 1在大肠杆菌中的克隆、表达及纯化
Protein Expr Purif. 2017 Feb;130:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Sunflower seed allergy.向日葵籽过敏
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;29(3):498-503. doi: 10.1177/0394632016651648. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
Delay in diagnosis of severe food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome caused by mango.由芒果引起的严重食物蛋白诱导的小肠结肠炎综合征的诊断延迟。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Aug;115(2):157-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
7
Immediate hypersensitivity reaction with mango.芒果引起的速发型超敏反应。
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2014;82(5):445-53. doi: 10.5603/PiAP.2014.0058.
8
Allergenic lipid transfer proteins from plant-derived foods do not immunologically and clinically behave homogeneously: the kiwifruit LTP as a model.植物源性食物中的变应原脂质转移蛋白在免疫学和临床上的表现并不完全一致:以猕猴桃 LTP 为例。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027856. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
9
Hypersensitivity manifestations to the fruit mango.对芒果的过敏反应表现
Asia Pac Allergy. 2011 Apr;1(1):43-9. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2011.1.1.43. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
10
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report.美国食物过敏诊断与管理指南:美国国立过敏和传染病研究所资助的专家小组报告摘要
Nutr Res. 2011 Jan;31(1):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.001.