• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
International differences in patterns of cannabis use among youth: Prevalence, perceptions of harm, and driving under the influence in Canada, England & United States.青少年大麻使用模式的国际差异:加拿大、英国和美国的流行率、危害认知和影响下驾驶情况。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
2
Differences in patterns of cannabis use among youth: Prevalence, perceptions of harm and driving under the influence in the USA where non-medical cannabis markets have been established, proposed and prohibited.青少年大麻使用模式的差异:在美国,非医用大麻市场已经建立、提议和禁止,大麻使用的流行率、危害认知和影响驾驶行为。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Nov;37(7):903-911. doi: 10.1111/dar.12842. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
3
Prevalence and modes of cannabis use among youth in Canada, England, and the US, 2017 to 2019.2017 年至 2019 年加拿大、英国和美国青少年使用大麻的流行率和模式。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 1;219:108505. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108505. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Perceptions of cannabis use risk to mental health among youth in Canada, England and the United States from 2017 to 2021.2017 年至 2021 年期间加拿大、英国和美国青少年对大麻使用风险的认知与心理健康。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Sep 1;250:110904. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110904. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
5
The Prevalence of Vaping and Smoking as Modes of Delivery for Nicotine and Cannabis among Youth in Canada, England and the United States.加拿大、英国和美国青少年中尼古丁和大麻的吸食和吸烟方式的流行率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 25;16(21):4111. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214111.
6
Prevalence and forms of cannabis use in legal vs. illegal recreational cannabis markets.合法与非法娱乐用大麻市场中大麻使用的流行情况及形式。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102658. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102658. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
Correlates of Marijuana Drugged Driving and Openness to Driving While High: Evidence from Colorado and Washington.大麻影响下驾驶的相关因素及对在吸食大麻状态下驾驶的接受度:来自科罗拉多州和华盛顿州的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0146853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146853. eCollection 2016.
8
Perceived safety of cannabis intoxication predicts frequency of driving while intoxicated.吸食大麻后感知到的安全性可预测大麻致醉后驾驶的频率。
Prev Med. 2020 Feb;131:105956. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105956. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
9
Minimum legal age laws and perceived access to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and other substances among youth in Canada, England, and the United States: 2017-2021.最低法定年龄法律与加拿大、英国和美国青少年对香烟、电子烟和其他物质的感知获取:2017-2021 年。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 May;115:104003. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104003. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Trends in cannabis use over time among Canadian youth: 2004-2014.加拿大青年中随时间推移的大麻使用趋势:2004-2014 年。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cannabis use patterns among emerging adults in California who use tobacco: Differences by sexual identity, gender identity, and sex assigned at birth.加利福尼亚州使用烟草的新兴成年人中的大麻使用模式:按性取向、性别认同和出生时指定的性别划分的差异。
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 Jul 14;22:100624. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100624. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Attitudes toward driving after cannabis use: a systematic review.大麻使用后对驾驶的态度:一项系统评价。
J Cannabis Res. 2024 Sep 28;6(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s42238-024-00240-0.
3
Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, Cannabis, and Delta-8 THC: Perceived Likelihood, Risk Perceptions, and Behaviors.在酒精、大麻和δ-8四氢大麻酚影响下驾驶:感知可能性、风险认知与行为
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Apr 9:1-10. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2339506.
4
Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.大麻合法化法律对健康、安全及社会经济的影响:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 30;19(4):e1362. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1362. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
How research and policy can shape driving under the influence of cannabis.研究与政策如何影响大麻影响下的驾驶行为。
Addiction. 2024 Feb;119(2):208-210. doi: 10.1111/add.16372. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Perceptions of cannabis use risk to mental health among youth in Canada, England and the United States from 2017 to 2021.2017 年至 2021 年期间加拿大、英国和美国青少年对大麻使用风险的认知与心理健康。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Sep 1;250:110904. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110904. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
7
Recreational Cannabis Legislation: substance use and impaired driving among Canadian rural and urban postsecondary students.休闲大麻立法:加拿大农村和城市高等院校学生的物质使用与酒驾情况
J Cannabis Res. 2023 Mar 15;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42238-023-00175-y.
8
Effects of Cannabis Legalization on Road Safety: A Literature Review.大麻合法化对道路安全的影响:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054655.
9
Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid review.数字干预措施在青少年物质使用障碍中的应用:快速综述。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Feb 17;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00518-1.
10
Driving under the influence of cannabis: perceptions from Canadian youth.大麻影响下的驾驶:加拿大青年的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):2384. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14658-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Retail price and availability of illicit cannabis in Canada.加拿大非法大麻的零售价格和供应情况。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:402-408. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Differences in patterns of cannabis use among youth: Prevalence, perceptions of harm and driving under the influence in the USA where non-medical cannabis markets have been established, proposed and prohibited.青少年大麻使用模式的差异:在美国,非医用大麻市场已经建立、提议和禁止,大麻使用的流行率、危害认知和影响驾驶行为。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Nov;37(7):903-911. doi: 10.1111/dar.12842. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
3
Adolescent Marijuana Use and Perceived Ease of Access Before and After Recreational Marijuana Implementation in Colorado.科罗拉多州实施娱乐性大麻合法化前后青少年对大麻的使用情况及获取大麻的难易程度认知
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Feb 23;53(3):451-456. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1334069. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
Risk is still relevant: Time-varying associations between perceived risk and marijuana use among US 12th grade students from 1991 to 2016.风险仍然具有相关性:1991年至2016年美国12年级学生中感知风险与大麻使用之间的时变关联。
Addict Behav. 2017 Nov;74:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.026. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach.修订版家庭富裕量表的心理测量学验证:一种潜在变量方法。
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:771-784. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9339-x. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
6
A new version of the HBSC Family Affluence Scale - FAS III: Scottish Qualitative Findings from the International FAS Development Study.《青少年健康行为与社会环境调查(HBSC)家庭富裕量表新版本 - FAS III:国际FAS发展研究的苏格兰定性研究结果》
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:233-245. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9325-3. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
7
Cannabis Liberalization and Adolescent Cannabis Use: A Cross-National Study in 38 Countries.大麻合法化与青少年大麻使用:一项在38个国家开展的跨国研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0143562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143562. eCollection 2015.
8
Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA.评估美国娱乐用大麻合法化对公共健康的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;97(6):607-15. doi: 10.1002/cpt.110. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
Assessing the effects of medical marijuana laws on marijuana use: the devil is in the details.评估医用大麻法律对大麻使用的影响:细节决定成败。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2015 Winter;34(1):7-31. doi: 10.1002/pam.21804.
10
Implications of marijuana legalization for adolescent substance use.大麻合法化对青少年物质使用的影响。
Subst Abus. 2014;35(4):331-5. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2014.943386.

青少年大麻使用模式的国际差异:加拿大、英国和美国的流行率、危害认知和影响下驾驶情况。

International differences in patterns of cannabis use among youth: Prevalence, perceptions of harm, and driving under the influence in Canada, England & United States.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.050
PMID:30412908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6324962/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis is the most widely used illicit substance in the world. An increasing number of jurisdictions have legalized medical and non-medical cannabis; comparisons across jurisdictions can help evaluate the impact of these policy innovations. The current study examined patterns of cannabis use among youth in Canada (CA), England (EN) and the United States (US). At the time of study, non-medical cannabis use was prohibited federally in all three countries; however, medical cannabis was accessible with varying restrictions in CA, EN and most US states, while non-medical cannabis was legal in four US states.

METHODS

Data come from an international online survey conducted in July 2017 (n = 12,064). Youth, aged 16-19, were asked about cannabis consumption, perceived access to cannabis, perceptions of harm, and driving after cannabis use. All estimates represent weighted data.

RESULTS

US youth were more likely to report more frequent cannabis consumption, easier access, lower perceptions of harm, and higher rates of driving after cannabis use than CA and EN youth. CA youth reported more frequent consumption, easier access, and higher rates of driving after cannabis use than EN youth.

CONCLUSION

CA and US youth had higher prevalence of use, easier access, lower perceived harm and higher driving rates after cannabis use in comparison to EN. These differences may reflect more permissive cannabis policies in CA and US, as well as pre-existing trends. Future waves of the international cannabis study will examine trends over time within the same countries after cannabis legalization in CA and additional US states.

摘要

引言

大麻是世界上使用最广泛的非法物质。越来越多的司法管辖区已经将医用和非医用大麻合法化;对这些政策创新进行司法管辖区间的比较有助于评估其影响。本研究考察了加拿大(CA)、英国(EN)和美国(US)青少年的大麻使用模式。在研究时,这三个国家的联邦都禁止非医用大麻;然而,CA、EN 和大多数美国州都可以获得医用大麻,但有不同的限制,而四个美国州则将非医用大麻合法化。

方法

数据来自于 2017 年 7 月进行的一项国际在线调查(n=12064)。16-19 岁的青少年被问及大麻消费、对大麻的感知可及性、对危害的看法以及大麻使用后的驾驶行为。所有估计值均代表加权数据。

结果

与 CA 和 EN 的青少年相比,美国青少年更有可能报告更频繁的大麻消费、更容易获得大麻、更低的危害感知以及更高的大麻使用后驾驶率。CA 青少年比 EN 青少年报告了更频繁的消费、更容易获得大麻以及更高的大麻使用后驾驶率。

结论

与 EN 相比,CA 和美国的青少年使用大麻的流行率更高、更容易获得、对危害的感知更低、大麻使用后的驾驶率更高。这些差异可能反映了 CA 和美国更宽松的大麻政策以及先前存在的趋势。国际大麻研究的未来波次将在 CA 和其他美国州医用大麻合法化后,在同一国家内考察一段时间内的趋势。