Optic Nerve Head Research Laboratory, Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Optic Nerve Head Research Laboratory, Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;199:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
To assess glaucoma specialists' detection of optic nerve head (ONH) rim tissue that is thin by optical coherence tomography (OCT) criteria.
Reliability analysis.
Five clinicians marked the disc margin (DM) and rim margin (RM) on stereophotographs of 151 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect eyes obtained within 3 months of OCT imaging. The photo and OCT infrared image for each eye were co-localized and regionalized into 12 sectors relative to the axis between the Bruch membrane opening (BMO) centroid and the fovea. For each clinician, the distance from BMO centroid to their DM (DM radius) and RM (RM radius) was used to generate sectoral rim width (RW) (DM radius-RM radius) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) (RM radius/DM radius) estimates. OCT minimum rim width (MRW) was determined by sector. Among all eyes, for each OCT MRW suspicious sector (<5% of OCT normative database), we determined each clinician's detection (clinician CDR ≥ 0.7).
Clinicians most commonly failed to detect OCT suspicious rim tissue in the nasal sectors. Among 502 sectors with suspicious OCT MRW, all 5 clinicians rated CDR ≥ 0.7 in only 29.5% and all 5 clinicians rated CDR < 0.7 in 21%. OCT suspicious rim thickness was most common (32% of eyes) in the nasal and inferior sectors. MRW vs clinician RW discordance was greatest nasally, while BMO vs clinician DM discordance was greatest temporally.
Clinicians most commonly failed to detect OCT suspicious rim thickness nasally where suspicious rim tissues were also most common.
评估青光眼专家通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)标准检测视神经头(ONH)边缘组织变薄的能力。
可靠性分析。
5 位临床医生在 OCT 成像后 3 个月内获得的 151 只青光眼或疑似青光眼眼的立体照片上标记视盘边缘(DM)和边缘边缘(RM)。每只眼睛的照片和 OCT 红外图像进行共定位,并相对于脉络膜膜开口(BMO)质心和黄斑之间的轴分为 12 个扇形区。对于每位临床医生,BMO 质心到他们 DM(DM 半径)和 RM(RM 半径)的距离用于生成扇形边缘宽度(RW)(DM 半径-RM 半径)和杯盘比(CDR)(RM 半径/DM 半径)估计值。OCT 最小边缘宽度(MRW)按扇形区确定。在所有眼中,对于每个 OCT MRW 可疑扇形区(<5%的 OCT 正常数据库),我们确定每位临床医生的检测(临床医生 CDR≥0.7)。
临床医生最常未能检测到 OCT 可疑边缘组织的鼻侧扇形区。在 502 个具有可疑 OCT MRW 的扇形区中,所有 5 位临床医生仅在 29.5%的情况下将 CDR 评为≥0.7,所有 5 位临床医生在 21%的情况下将 CDR 评为<0.7。OCT 可疑边缘厚度最常见(32%的眼睛)在鼻侧和下侧扇形区。MRW 与临床医生 RW 的不匹配在鼻侧最大,而 BMO 与临床医生 DM 的不匹配在颞侧最大。
临床医生最常未能检测到 OCT 可疑的鼻侧边缘厚度,而可疑的边缘组织也最常见。